Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kjones

(1,053 posts)
90. Do you know what homogeneous means? I'm sorry, but no, it doesn't always mean race.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 01:00 AM
Feb 2016

NH/VT - The Democrats that make up their primaries are ideologically homogenous
relative to SC, where the Dem voting block includes larger percentages of moderate
Dems.

I did not bring up race, JD jumped to conclusions, and you jumped to his rescue.
JD brought it up, you bought it...an now you own it too. So maybe you can tell
me, why are you two bringing up race and then erroneously complaining about
people bringing up race when, clearly, the discussion was about ideology?

Yeah BillyDawg Feb 2016 #1
And it is totally irrelevant to the November result. JDPriestly Feb 2016 #44
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #46
Democrats who a) don't have the organizational and persuasive ability to turn their own JDPriestly Feb 2016 #63
I know, how dare those people live in a state that isn't homogenous... kjones Feb 2016 #79
I live in California, a less homogeneous state does not exist. JDPriestly Feb 2016 #83
Hmm, I never mentioned race....but you sure did. kjones Feb 2016 #85
What the fuck? JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #88
Do you know what homogeneous means? I'm sorry, but no, it doesn't always mean race. kjones Feb 2016 #90
Nope, done with you. Welcome to full ignore. JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #92
... kjones Feb 2016 #96
What then did you mean by homogeneous? JDPriestly Feb 2016 #100
Thanks for your post. senseandsensibility Feb 2016 #87
sorry your man lost. stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #57
So what are you suggesting? NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #114
Wow!! Historic night! PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #2
Very low tunout elmac Feb 2016 #77
Historic beatdown. nt LexVegas Feb 2016 #3
in-pressive DrDan Feb 2016 #4
This is an exciting time ismnotwasm Feb 2016 #5
Love that animation! DCBob Feb 2016 #7
wow.. I'm smiling! boston bean Feb 2016 #6
Me too.... DCBob Feb 2016 #9
SC PowerToThePeople Feb 2016 #8
Good grief.. this has nothing to with Barry Goldwater. DCBob Feb 2016 #10
unbelievable DURHAM D Feb 2016 #11
what a nonsensical post.... chillfactor Feb 2016 #12
What a pathetic post. tammywammy Feb 2016 #16
WTF? musicblind Feb 2016 #17
awwwwwwwwwwww..... MrWendel Feb 2016 #21
That is good PowerToThePeople Feb 2016 #22
This is the dumbest argument that BS supporters make... book_worm Feb 2016 #33
Best laugh I've had today NBachers Feb 2016 #43
Awwww, are we having some sour grapes? Waaaaaaaaaa! Lil Missy Feb 2016 #55
Seriously??????? Beacool Feb 2016 #65
"Let's make America whole again!" El Supremo Feb 2016 #13
Do you think this thread is a good step in that direction? (nt) noamnety Feb 2016 #34
I wonder myself desmiller Feb 2016 #54
bernie only broke 40% in 1 (ONE!!!) South Carolina County alcibiades_mystery Feb 2016 #14
Sanders has not won the minority vote in any of the primaries that have occurred so far Number23 Feb 2016 #25
It's not a coincidence that he's courting the independent & republicans as well. giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #27
Nope. Those groups gave him a big victory in New Hampshire. Number23 Feb 2016 #28
yes he will mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #42
That's the trend. giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #45
it's great mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #47
He won the Latino vote in Nevada. n/t Loudestlib Feb 2016 #64
No, he really didn't. Number23 Feb 2016 #67
. Loudestlib Feb 2016 #80
He may have won that age group but he lost overall among minorities. Number23 Feb 2016 #101
If he won the Latino vote in NV, he would have won the caucus. But he didn't. nt MADem Feb 2016 #113
I wonder how much his campaign has had to pay for all those surrogates stomping around with MADem Feb 2016 #59
And that is the ugly I was talking about on the other thread. HERVEPA Feb 2016 #62
EXPLAIN, please. You do know that campaigns cost money, do you not? MADem Feb 2016 #73
Since you either are tone deaf or are choosing to pretend you are, the "stomping around" ... HERVEPA Feb 2016 #94
You're much too sensitive. And "stomping around" adequately MADem Feb 2016 #97
Actually I was out for dinner and seeing a play this evening HERVEPA Feb 2016 #98
Short play. nt MADem Feb 2016 #99
Nope. With dinner, I was out from about 4:45 until about 10:30 or so. HERVEPA Feb 2016 #102
Well, maybe it's just that all of your posts slamming me with "ugly" have come to my attention at MADem Feb 2016 #105
Yeh, that must be it. HERVEPA Feb 2016 #106
All that costs less BernieforPres2016 Feb 2016 #78
Well, thanks so much for hoisting those true colors so we all can see them! MADem Feb 2016 #86
As in making a point? HERVEPA Feb 2016 #91
Nice to see you ... again. MADem Feb 2016 #95
He blew a small fortune in SC, I think. I'll be interested in seeing what he spent there. MADem Feb 2016 #103
I read earlier that he'd invensted a lot, of both money and manpower, but I had no idea Lucinda Feb 2016 #110
And he was traveling with three guys who aren't your average "Motel 6" dwellers, either. MADem Feb 2016 #112
I am so excited! sheshe2 Feb 2016 #15
Great!!! DCBob Feb 2016 #18
Looking forward to Tuesday. sheshe2 Feb 2016 #20
I don't care what they say about votes not counting- I feel good when I visit my local polling place NBachers Feb 2016 #53
Maybe the biggest primary blowout in history MaggieD Feb 2016 #19
Reminds me of WV- 2008 TSIAS Feb 2016 #29
Don't stop believin! MaggieD Feb 2016 #35
Yes!!!!!!!!!! KICK IT!!! nt Persondem Feb 2016 #23
That is a massive, spectacular ass whipping. Good googly moogly... Number23 Feb 2016 #24
What a thread to wake up to JustAnotherGen Feb 2016 #116
It's been a hell of a good time around here the last 24 hours Number23 Feb 2016 #121
k&r bigtree Feb 2016 #26
K&R!!!!!!! beaglelover Feb 2016 #30
Last minute negative swift boating backfires. oasis Feb 2016 #31
Yep.. good point. DCBob Feb 2016 #36
It has been going on for over a week. riversedge Feb 2016 #38
I'm not referring to the transcripts. oasis Feb 2016 #40
Yep--that was the cheapest shot of the campaign thus far. A real low blow. nt MADem Feb 2016 #61
Probably a reason they lost the Civil War... datguy_6 Feb 2016 #32
That's insulting comment to the good Democrats in SC. DCBob Feb 2016 #37
Unnh, the ancestors of many of those SC Dem voters weren't doing ANY voting MADem Feb 2016 #69
An amazingly stupid comment. Persondem Feb 2016 #72
Wait, what, WHAT? NurseJackie Feb 2016 #39
wooohoooo!!! HRC 2016! mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #41
Historic! mcar Feb 2016 #48
South Carolina, sulphurdunn Feb 2016 #49
So Democrats in SC are not as good as Democrats up north?? DCBob Feb 2016 #51
Maybe you don't understand the way primaries work. yardwork Feb 2016 #56
Are you serious? The SC primary is one primary where black people actually have a defined voice. MADem Feb 2016 #66
There wouldn't be something to brag about if Hillary had won the votes of 85% whites. Beacool Feb 2016 #68
And Hillary will lose SC in the general election ultragreen Feb 2016 #50
So? DCBob Feb 2016 #52
So they vote status quo. desmiller Feb 2016 #58
No they voted for the candidate they feel will best represent them and fight for their issues. DCBob Feb 2016 #71
Tell that to Obama. He kicked her tail in 08. desmiller Feb 2016 #74
Different time different opponent. DCBob Feb 2016 #76
Same situation. They didn't knew him then. desmiller Feb 2016 #107
Perhaps you are partially correct. DCBob Feb 2016 #117
On the ground in SC....Every. Fucking. County. Epic. nt msanthrope Feb 2016 #60
Boy, did MSNBC call THAT one wrong!!! MADem Feb 2016 #108
Toe sucker was the consultant, I'm betting.....nt msanthrope Feb 2016 #115
Hillary beat Bernie in the young African American demographic in SC. Trust Buster Feb 2016 #70
You better listen to granny if you know what's good for you!! MADem Feb 2016 #75
Enjoy your status quo, SC desmiller Feb 2016 #81
I can not understand how people in S.Carolina can be so naive. It's sad. YOHABLO Feb 2016 #82
They are not naive.. they simply prefer Hillary Clinton to be our nominee.. DCBob Feb 2016 #118
What's naive is,voting for someone delusional and Bernie is delusional. n/t ohheckyeah Feb 2016 #120
You must be sooooo proud!!!!!!!!!!!! senseandsensibility Feb 2016 #84
Awww Lucinda Feb 2016 #111
Happy to join this wonderful celebration!!! nt UtahLib Feb 2016 #89
Hurray! McCamy Taylor Feb 2016 #93
Turnout was rather sad. basselope Feb 2016 #104
No it wasn't--not as big as 08, but bigger than 04.It was more than the state Dems expected. nt MADem Feb 2016 #109
lol. basselope Feb 2016 #119
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»CNN: Hillary wins every c...»Reply #90