Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: CNN poll pairs Clinton and Sanders against the three GOP rivals in November matchups [View all]Journeyman
(15,049 posts)5. So how's that going to work in a matchup between Cruz and Clinton? . . .
Does the write-in candidate take it all?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
CNN poll pairs Clinton and Sanders against the three GOP rivals in November matchups [View all]
Bucky
Mar 2016
OP
Another CRUCIAL reason we cannot elect HRC- A fraud on the whole country, which will cost 30 million
Baobab
Mar 2016
#88
The King of Tort Reform in Texas wh'se ranch Scalia died at in Texas was probably trying to
Dustlawyer
Mar 2016
#70
And unfortunately Benghazi, emails, etc is just a smoke screen for her more egregious behaviours
GoneOffShore
Mar 2016
#98
Of course the other major reason is that she may well be indicted before November.
seaotter
Mar 2016
#8
The irony is the lack of irony in your interlocutor posting that image.
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2016
#12
The only one that matters is how they do against Trump... Cruz and Rubio are done
scheming daemons
Mar 2016
#24
Were these the same brilliant pollsters that had Romney beating Obama ONE WEEK before THAT election?
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#26
Every political scientist worth their salt will tell you that 3% difference 8 months out is utterly
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#37
No serious thinker would point to a 3% difference 8 months out as evidence of anything. Bottom line
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#62
My post related to a claim made in the OP. It wasn't about you. I proudly stand by my post.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#81
Because I choose to stay on the thread topic. Your rude posts are not welcome.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#104
What exactly was all that guff about Un-electability? Dis-information from a highly placed Rat?
Ford_Prefect
Mar 2016
#28
well, HC supporters think their baseless suppositions about this and that trumps these polls
stupidicus
Mar 2016
#31
You say "electability is everything" but what about Hillary's resume? It ain't gonna pad itself.
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#35
However, Clinton's very high "unfavorability" numbers make that prospect more likely...
Peace Patriot
Mar 2016
#82
We'll never know about that, Sanders won't be running against any of those republicans.
George II
Mar 2016
#65
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard: Judge Clinton by her Actions, not just words; Hillary's poor judgement
hillarysong2016
Mar 2016
#78
"electability is everything" -- That'swhattheysaid; yep; that'swhattheysaid!!!!
kristopher
Mar 2016
#80
Too bad Democrats don't have the guts to buck their party's establishment!
Cosmic Dancer
Mar 2016
#95
I'd call it a Cult of Personality...in complete denial about the salient facts. Familiarity
libdem4life
Mar 2016
#102
I don't let the Republicans make up my mind. I use my own faculties. I have never trashed HRC.
libdem4life
Mar 2016
#108