Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

think

(11,641 posts)
17. Choosing extremely flawed legislation like TARP over trying to find GOOD solutions to huge problems
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:54 AM
Mar 2016

isn't called living in the real world. It's called fear and political expedience.

The Inspector General overseeing TARP had this to say about TARP:

Neil Barofsky on the failures of TARP

By Jeff Horwich
July 23, 2012 | 4:05 AM


~Snip~

Barofsky: Well essentially, they wanted me to back down, I think. Every time I started to raising some concerns, the pushback I got was remarkable. I remember within the first couple of days, I started hearing a refrain that I heard over the course of a couple of years -- from the Bush administration to the Obama administration -- saying “Neil, we hear what you’re saying about your concerns about fraud and potential abuses in this program but really you don’t have to worry about it because these are banks, they are not going to risk their reputations by taking unfair advantage and possibly profiting off of the taxpayer.”

Horwich: You write a lot about your disillusionment with the Home Affordable Modification Program -- TARP money that was supposed to go to banks to help people stay in their homes. In your view, what happened to it?

Barofsky: Well, the program has been an abysmal failure; supposed to help up to four million people, even today it’s only 20 percent of that number and it doesn’t look like it’s going to get much better. We confronted Tim Geithner about this and his response was very telling. He wasn’t talking about how the program could be improved to help homeowners. He said the program, would help and I quote here “foam the runway for the banks.”

And by that he explained the banks could deal with a certain number of millions of foreclosures over a certain period of time but anything more than that could put the financial system and those banks in jeopardy. With that in mind, there’s little surprise that the program has been such a failure for everyone other than the large banks....

http://www.marketplace.org/2012/07/23/economy/neil-barofsky-failures-tarp



This is what happens when lawmakers choose expediency and vote for bad laws. The big banks got theirs and the American people got screwed. Bernie Sanders knew the TARP program was flawed and that's why he voted against it.

Just because YOU weren't one of the millions that got screwed doesn't mean that the TARP program was a good thing. Overall it was horrible legislation for millions of Americans and awesome legislation for corrupt banks that should have had it's top leaders prosecuted and the banks broken up. Now the too big to fail banks are even bigger than they were before the crisis.

And during that time Goldman Sachs lied to congress, lied to it's clients, and was convicted of breaking US law while it's CEO became a billionaire.

How in any way shape or form is that JUSTICE? How is that good legislation?

I
You got it! yallerdawg Mar 2016 #1
I actually hopes she hammers this point home in tonight's debate kennetha Mar 2016 #3
K & R Nonhlanhla Mar 2016 #2
The UAW disagrees with you Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #4
The UAW disagrees with my analysis of Hillary's real point? kennetha Mar 2016 #6
See reply #7 Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #13
Do you know who Neil Barofsky is and why his opinion should matter? think Mar 2016 #5
He's a mixed bag kennetha Mar 2016 #20
Go on.... think Mar 2016 #25
NO. There were other ways to deal with the big banks going belly up. Avalux Mar 2016 #7
There are always logically possible alternatives kennetha Mar 2016 #8
If Tarp had been voted down what do you think would have happened? If if was so vitally important PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #11
Choosing extremely flawed legislation like TARP over trying to find GOOD solutions to huge problems think Mar 2016 #17
you'd prefer a depression? kennetha Mar 2016 #19
No. I prefer that better legislation passed. And it could have had Democrats pushed for it. think Mar 2016 #24
The "real world" is a fucked up place last I checked ... ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #28
And again you miss the real fallout from Clinton's point. It caused people to discuss PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #9
x 100000 AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #42
No, Clinton was lying.... again. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #10
you are not refuting my point kennetha Mar 2016 #12
Your point has no foundation. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #14
It was the only answer on the floor that was going to pass kennetha Mar 2016 #15
I think they should have been allowed to fail because depositors were protected. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #16
Ok, you get a cookie for winning the word parsing game ... ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #30
Out of balance zipplewrath Mar 2016 #43
Was going to respond to this mischaracterized nonsense, but the Michigan voters already have. EndElectoral Mar 2016 #18
Hillary claimed Bernie OPPOSED the auto bailout which was a LIE. No parsing of words changes that. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #21
Actually that's not at all what she said. she was quite precise in her language. kennetha Mar 2016 #27
From her own big mouth: AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #29
He vote against the money that ended up saving the Auto INdustry kennetha Mar 2016 #31
SHE SAID VERBATIM "HE WAS AGAINST THE AUTO BAILOUT" - THAT WAS A LIE. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #32
it was flat out true kennetha Mar 2016 #34
you are flat out lying to try to cover her butt for lying AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #40
Real thinking Americans understand what Bernie did ... ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #22
What Sanders did was no different than what MOST DEMOCRATS DID in 2008 Armstead Mar 2016 #23
But the democrats -- most of them anyway kennetha Mar 2016 #26
I agree with you when you say most Dems ... ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #33
This is like Gwhittey Mar 2016 #35
Here's what lost Michigan for her: Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #36
Probably Republicans voting for Sanders kennetha Mar 2016 #37
What "lost" Michigan for Hillary is more people agree ... ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #41
seriously doubt that kennetha Mar 2016 #44
Exactly. She lost all credibility with that line of attack ... ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #39
yes Bernie is a fraud. kennetha Mar 2016 #45
Yes. I'd double down on that attack. It obviously worked really well in Michigan. DefenseLawyer Mar 2016 #38
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Point about TARP, the...»Reply #17