Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Zira

(1,054 posts)

2. And, losing their base who know better. Being associated with these people (including hillary)

Reply to Maedhros (Reply #1)

Mon Mar 21, 2016, 06:33 PM

Mar 2016

and being a "human rights organization" is only trashing their reputation. Best not to sand next to people like Hillary if you want to say you are for Human rights.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Human Rights Campaign endorsed Hillary ... and Mark Kirk (R) [View all] TheDormouse Mar 2016 OP

They are nothing if not consistent, choosing the more conservative choice in each case.[n/t] Maedhros Mar 2016 #1

And, losing their base who know better. Being associated with these people (including hillary) Zira Mar 2016 #2

It would seem so. nt kristopher Mar 2016 #7

money ibegurpard Mar 2016 #3

Hillary Clinton not only isn't responsible for who they endorse sufrommich Mar 2016 #4

u obviously missed the whole point--it's about who is TheDormouse Mar 2016 #5

No,it doesn't need to be "re-assessed". What a ridiculous attempt to sufrommich Mar 2016 #6