Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
67. Explains the missing Inspector General.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:20 AM
Mar 2016

The author helped put the S&L crooks behind bars in the 1990s as a regulator and forensic economist for the SEC. Black helped Iceland put its banksters behind bars, but for some reason, the Federal government failed to call on him for help in the great Bankster Bailout of 2008. He knows a bit about Inspector Generals and Control Fraud.


The Clintons Have Not Changed: The Clintonian War on the IGs

By William K. Black
February 23, 2016 Bloomington, MN

Secretary Hillary Clinton is asking Democratic voters to believe that she has experienced a “Road to Damascus” conversion from her roots as a leader of the “New Democrats” – the Wall Street wing of the Democratic Party. When exactly this conversion occurred is never stated, but an interesting fact has emerged that demonstrates it did not occur during her service as the Secretary of State. A Wall Street Journal story provides the key facts, but none of the analysis.

Newly released emails indicate that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her top staff were involved in the selection process for the State Department’s internal watchdog, a position that ultimately went unfilled throughout her four-year tenure.


The WSJ’s angle is that such involvement in the selection of the Inspector General (IG) is a threat to the IG’s vital independence. True, and also true as the story notes that Hillary was far from rare as an agency or department head in seeking to select behind the scenes the supposedly independent IGs.

The function of the IG is to “speak truth to power.” Naturally, “power” hates IGs with a purple passion. Government leaders are most likely to hate having its abuses made public by IG when the government leader is secretly acting in concert with immensely powerful private leaders for their mutual benefit at the expense of the public.

What the WSJ missed is that the Clinton’s, for decades, have sought to destroy the independence and effectiveness of the IGs precisely because of the threat that they pose of blowing the whistle on these abuses. The Obama administration, of course, is famous for its prosecutions of those who blow the whistle on such abuses. The real story is not that Hillary attempted to select a lap dog as IG – the real story is that for her entire tenure as Secretary, four years, she left unfilled the leadership position of the only institution in the State Department dedicated to maintaining integrity and preventing the abuse of public power to aid cronies. That aid, of course, comes with the clear expectation that the cronies will make the head of the State Department wealthy as soon as she or he steps down. There is no possible defense for that, and it does not happen accidentally. The primary blame goes to President Obama, who made no nomination for the position for the entire four years. It wasn’t Republican intransigence that explains this scandal.

CONTINUED...

http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2016/03/clintons-not-changed-clintonian-war-igs.html#more-10101


Bill Black is one of "those" economists who won't play ball with the money crowd. Why? He. Has. Integrity.
Does the right wing sourcing stop at some point? upaloopa Mar 2016 #1
I get your point. pantsonfire Mar 2016 #5
Nobody gives a crap about emails and transcripts but those in opposition upaloopa Mar 2016 #7
Actually, as a taxpayer - I do. Kittycat Mar 2016 #11
We are all tax payers. That doesn't give you the right to make up scandals about our candidates upaloopa Mar 2016 #35
These people couldn't care less about electing more Democrats to office... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #12
The State Department’s Office of Inspector General cares w4rma Mar 2016 #18
The Clinton foundation is a charity that has done more good in the world than Bernie ever has! upaloopa Mar 2016 #36
You'll find this an eyeopener. snagglepuss Mar 2016 #55
I do. 840high Mar 2016 #24
This makes me think of all the HRC supporters' responses to this news Ned_Devine Mar 2016 #27
You join all the other Hillary Clinton scandal mongers not good company upaloopa Mar 2016 #37
This issue is not going to go away no matter who brings it up Ned_Devine Mar 2016 #52
I supported her in '08. Took me 840high Mar 2016 #59
you and everyone; appalling reactions to appalling behavior amborin Mar 2016 #63
Who cares if they're corrupted right? As long as they have that D. nt revbones Mar 2016 #30
Produce the evidence of corruption plerase. upaloopa Mar 2016 #38
Of the many? revbones Mar 2016 #54
I like to know what our candidates have been doing. senz Mar 2016 #50
Elect a possible ticking time bomb Politicalboi Mar 2016 #51
Only her hero worshiping devotees don't. The rest of us do. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #65
Do you feel the same way about what the RW is saying about Bernie? pnwmom Mar 2016 #58
Sadly, no.. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #9
The actual source is emails written by Clinton's staffers at State. (eom) eomer Mar 2016 #10
The Hill is RW? Or the actual emails obtained from FOIAs released are RW? Autumn Mar 2016 #47
I wish... pantsonfire Mar 2016 #2
Get ready for the link bashing NWCorona Mar 2016 #3
Sorry I already did and it should be bashed! upaloopa Mar 2016 #8
I really don't have a problem with the bashing NWCorona Mar 2016 #13
It isn't relative to anyone upaloopa Mar 2016 #16
You really can't say that when the actual emails are supplied NWCorona Mar 2016 #19
The emails have been supplied. There is no there there upaloopa Mar 2016 #20
Actually that's not entirely true NWCorona Mar 2016 #22
No there were not. upaloopa Mar 2016 #39
Sorry but if you want to be taken seriously NWCorona Mar 2016 #43
It's not honorable to vote 840high Mar 2016 #60
Democrats who work like this should be ashamed. highprincipleswork Mar 2016 #23
The Clintons have boundry issues. n/t Wilms Mar 2016 #4
Don't get your hopes up. It's Judicial Watch. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #6
Does it change where the emails came from? Kittycat Mar 2016 #14
You will forgive me if I take this with a grain of salt. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #17
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #15
Maybe Hillary wants to end the revolving door farleftlib Mar 2016 #21
Ben Gawzi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! leftofcool Mar 2016 #25
Who gives a shit what some RW asshole says??? giftedgirl77 Mar 2016 #26
Didn't take Princess Weathervane's Ostrich Army long, did it? Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #28
Hillary does it but of course 840high Mar 2016 #61
"The Right Wing Is To Blame" because John Poet Mar 2016 #66
I don't think the FBI is merely looking at classification errors. Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #29
Brilliant post! farleftlib Mar 2016 #32
I was appalled when she blamed Pres Obama for the rise of ISIS. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #44
I was appalled by her entire tenure as SoS farleftlib Mar 2016 #46
I was discussing this with friends at dinner the other night. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #49
Agreed farleftlib Mar 2016 #53
The MIC and the foreign partys involved WDIM Mar 2016 #33
Maybe. But FBI Director Comey was willing to buck the Bush junta on... Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author WDIM Mar 2016 #34
.^that x100+ 840high Mar 2016 #62
Her record for political favors exchanged for donations WDIM Mar 2016 #31
Post them ! upaloopa Mar 2016 #40
they have been posted, repeatedly amborin Mar 2016 #48
exactly and ignored repeatedly. nt WDIM Mar 2016 #68
Ack! AzDar Mar 2016 #41
knr amborin Mar 2016 #42
Drip Drip Drip Politicalboi Mar 2016 #56
I am gonna need more evidence of corruption here. Vattel Mar 2016 #57
It's a conservative source but that's because they took the initiative Babel_17 Mar 2016 #64
Explains the missing Inspector General. Octafish Mar 2016 #67
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»New emails highlight inte...»Reply #67