Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Time Warner owns CNN (Hillary Clinton's 8th largest donor) [View all]RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)53. Ah, so you weren't replying to the OP.
I wonder how many people do know how few companies own the majority of media outlets, what their contributions look like, and how that influences behavior.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Time Warner owns CNN (Hillary Clinton's 8th largest donor) [View all]
blueintelligentsia
Mar 2016
OP
I think the problem is, what does "disclose" mean that they're not already doing?
ucrdem
Mar 2016
#14
It was just an opinion expressed. Ok, bravenak claimed to speak for all regular people...
JustABozoOnThisBus
Mar 2016
#22
So even though you don't dismiss bias, it only matters if its a deciding vote?
pantsonfire
Mar 2016
#18
THIS IS A Matter of Credibility And Most Certainly Represents A CONFLICT OF INTEREST!
CorporatistNation
Mar 2016
#49
Then you must be an activist for changing Citizens United and Campaign Finance Reform.
FarPoint
Mar 2016
#83
More media transparency would be a good thing. Anyone that thinks otherwise is a fool.
RedCappedBandit
Mar 2016
#58
Yeah we get it. Time Warner linemen coughing up hundreds of thousands. Yeah, that's it.
Scuba
Mar 2016
#65