Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

(800 posts)

12. It is..

Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:52 PM

Mar 2016

but not as insurmountable, especially when you consider the possibility of those superdelegate votes flipping the other way.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Notice How CNN Invariably Includes Superdelegates in its Comparison Graphics.. [View all] speaktruthtopower Mar 2016 OP

And that lead will definitely be less after today. SheilaT Mar 2016 #1

They showed the delegate counts with and without superdelegates. RandySF Mar 2016 #2

Almost Never... speaktruthtopower Mar 2016 #3

They did about 15 minutes ago. RandySF Mar 2016 #4

Its is a Relevant Metric that Will Almost Inevitably Come Into Play Stallion Mar 2016 #6

but it's not on their running tag that they keep on the screen nt TheDormouse Mar 2016 #9

It's unprecedented. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #5

Do you know the history of the superdelegates? Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #8

Wow. Pretty ugly laid out like that. Ruby the Liberal Mar 2016 #16

She will probably have more superdelegates closer to the convention Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #7

300 delegates is not a modest lead nt. Trenzalore Mar 2016 #10

i agree they should not include superdelegates. But 300 is a big JI7 Mar 2016 #11

It is.. speaktruthtopower Mar 2016 #12

In huge block graphics that take up 1/4 of the TV. mhatrw Mar 2016 #13

The full count, always. JackRiddler Mar 2016 #14