Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: What do Hillary Supporters have against open primaries? [View all]Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)78. Republicans fear Clinton. They would love Sanders. The commercials practically write themselves.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
177 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Are you aware that many here are not democrats? There is no requirement that posters
Autumn
Mar 2016
#93
In 2002 Republicans crossed over to unseat a sitting Congresswoman in Georgia.
onehandle
Mar 2016
#2
Cynthia McKinney's opponent went on to win the GE. So how did anybody spoil anything? nt
GeorgiaPeanuts
Mar 2016
#95
McKinney. It's still fairly recent history, at least to a geezer like me (nt)
Recursion
Mar 2016
#64
Only Democrats should be allowed to select our nominee. That's not even debatable IMO.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#7
If a person wants to help decide who the Democrats run in the general election . . .
brush
Mar 2016
#135
Why should anyone commit to the party when the party won't commit to the people they supposedly
-none
Mar 2016
#68
In my state of Ohio, I saw interviews of Democrats voting for Kasich to hurt Trump.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#74
Republicans fear Clinton. They would love Sanders. The commercials practically write themselves.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#78
Can't Republicans run a concerted effort to reregister people to spoil a closed primary? nt
GeorgiaPeanuts
Mar 2016
#19
Open primaries are an opportunity for opposition parties to high jack...
dubyadiprecession
Mar 2016
#8
How so? Don't Candidates need the support of Independents to win General Elections?
GeorgiaPeanuts
Mar 2016
#9
They can vote whichever way they wish in the general. Primaries are much different.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#13
or the party to could be open to new supporters instead assuming it is all sabotage nt
Pat Riots
Mar 2016
#126
Um, the Democratic Party (composed of Democrats) decides who represents the Democratic Party.
randome
Mar 2016
#30
Don't be surprised when the democratic party loses when they ignore 43% of the electorate nt
GeorgiaPeanuts
Mar 2016
#34
Well, it sort of seems to me, for the sake of accuracy and organization, that...
randome
Mar 2016
#70
I registered voters in my state and there is the option to declare your party . . .
brush
Mar 2016
#168
MY father claimed to do this...he held one local union office or another throughout his working life
HereSince1628
Mar 2016
#98
In NY STATE, party affiliation for already registered is six months deadline, longest in
Karma13612
Mar 2016
#160
They fear the people who choose not to belong to a political party. Op[en primaries are
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2016
#29
No, I don't want Republicans trying to win the general by voting for Sanders in a primary.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#42
I'm a strong advocate for semi-open caucuses. Totally open leads to crossover skulduggery occurring
Kip Humphrey
Mar 2016
#37
Caucuses are outdated really. Most people don't have time to spend 3 or 4 hours . . .
brush
Mar 2016
#141
You do know that the repugs in Maricopa county closed polling sites from 200 to 60
brush
Mar 2016
#144
Everybody should be allowed to vote for whomever they choose. Period. FULL STOP!
pinebox
Mar 2016
#46
The Primaries are funded by the taxpayers... I think any who wish should have a say
GeorgiaPeanuts
Mar 2016
#54
So you agree that Indepoendents shouldn't have participated in yesterday's Party Caucuses.
brooklynite
Mar 2016
#60
States provide methods for other parties to have their own primary or caucus.
LiberalFighter
Mar 2016
#71
DWS actively discourages "better Dem candidates" down here. She likes fellow DINOs.
djean111
Mar 2016
#133
That would be fine if the government would stop supporting the two party system.
dogman
Mar 2016
#91
I see, how dare I have reservations about a Democrat... I must be a Right Winger...
GeorgiaPeanuts
Mar 2016
#108
No, every criticism of Clinton isn't a RW attack - just those that were thought up by RWers.
baldguy
Mar 2016
#109
You call it 'disparaging' to expect Democratic Party voters to select their candidates?
randome
Mar 2016
#104
that sounds cut and pasted- and confusing the DNC for the DLC is hilarious.
bettyellen
Mar 2016
#145
the party's been on a careful reducing plan to leave it with only those who'll literally take any
MisterP
Mar 2016
#100
I think Democrats should pick the Democratic candidate. I don't want Republicans
lunamagica
Mar 2016
#101
Independent voters hate Hillary. She loses when she has to go beyond her elderly Democrats base
Vote2016
Mar 2016
#115
We Independents are hated almost as much as Republicans. They hate that Democratic
liberal_at_heart
Mar 2016
#116
I'm torn. Closed primaries make more sense but my candidate does better in open ones.
pampango
Mar 2016
#118
oh hell, they don't even want an open party. They'd like to toss half of us from the party.
Live and Learn
Mar 2016
#119
I want our Democratic nominee to be picked by Democrats. What is so hard to understand about that?
upaloopa
Mar 2016
#152
Why do Sanders Supporters want the possibility of Limbaugh's "Operation Chaos"?
SFnomad
Mar 2016
#164
I think there are good reasons for either system, but I really wish every state did it the same
gollygee
Mar 2016
#173
Someone alerted my post? I am amazed because I try to be respectful when commenting
GeorgiaPeanuts
Mar 2016
#175