HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Inside the FBI Investigat... » Reply #32

Response to NWCorona (Original post)

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:03 PM

32. The Repubs are going to use this, big, whether she's cleared or charged.

And when they do, she will implode. It is suicidal to have her as our nominee. Already, 2/3 of voters see her as untrustworthy, and on top of that add this.

In the video at this link, Shane D'Aprile (publisher Campaign and Elections magazine, former campaign reporter for The Hill) says (4:10, 6:10):

"... Whoever the Republican nominee is, whether it's Donald Trump, whether it's somebody else eventually, Hillary Clinton is going to face a withering amount of attacks from the Republican nominee on this issue regardless of what happens with this investigation, right? Even in the best case scenario for Hillary Clinton, which is that she's cleared of any wrongdoing after this investigation finally concludes, there's still a very serious question of judgment here, and whoever the Republican nominee is, is going to jump on that come the Fall.
...
If the Clinton campaign thinks that, even like I said in that best case scenario -- that she's cleared of any wrongdoing in this -- if the Clinton campaign thinks that's the end of the issue, as a general election issue, they're nuts. There's no way it is. It's going to be a major issue. It goes directly, it impacts her numbers on trustworthiness, honesty, I mean this is a big thing for Republicans to exploit in the Fall. So it's a problem for her, either way."


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/03/31/one-shot-at-queen-fbi-ag-intensify-focus-on-clinton-email-probe.html

And no, she's NOT VETTED AT ALL ON THIS because Bernie will not bring it up. She is the one not vetted. She is the gigantic liability. There is no way to deny it. Her supporters can say they don't care, but they can't deny it.

And btw, her excuses that she repeats as her defenses on this are lies, blatant, flat lies. She was not "allowed" to have this server, others didn't do anything remotely similar, and some very classified stuff was transmitted; add to that, pay-to-play between the State Dept. and the Clinton Foundation.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 34 replies Author Time Post
NWCorona Mar 2016 OP
B2G Mar 2016 #1
NWCorona Mar 2016 #2
B2G Mar 2016 #3
intrepidity Mar 2016 #6
virtualobserver Mar 2016 #21
Jennylynn Mar 2016 #4
B2G Mar 2016 #5
awake Mar 2016 #8
Jennylynn Mar 2016 #9
NWCorona Mar 2016 #7
Jennylynn Mar 2016 #10
B2G Mar 2016 #12
virtualobserver Mar 2016 #23
B2G Mar 2016 #24
poprocks71 Mar 2016 #13
NWCorona Mar 2016 #14
poprocks71 Mar 2016 #16
mmonk Mar 2016 #11
GeorgeGist Mar 2016 #17
mmonk Mar 2016 #18
appal_jack Mar 2016 #15
IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #19
NWCorona Mar 2016 #20
highprincipleswork Mar 2016 #27
passy Mar 2016 #22
IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #25
passy Mar 2016 #26
HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #28
MFM008 Mar 2016 #29
BillZBubb Mar 2016 #30
MFM008 Mar 2016 #31
BillZBubb Mar 2016 #34
LineNew Reply The Repubs are going to use this, big, whether she's cleared or charged.
Waiting For Everyman Mar 2016 #32
bobthedrummer Mar 2016 #33
Please login to view edit histories.