HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Barney Franks blusters ag... » Reply #9

Response to Dem2 (Reply #7)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:02 AM

9. Persuasive to you? I didn't think it would be.

Doesn't change the fact he blustered much longer and took her time.

2. If it is irrelevant, then what is the point of bringing it up?

4. So on what basis did he "win?" What did he win? "win" - your word. Does confirming your bias for Hillary constitute a "win?"

Actually, I'm not arguing. You took issue with me and said Barney "won." What did he win?

Obviously, Frank has a problem with sharing time and having to be right or O'Donnell wouldn't have had to set the rule (which he broke) of equal time. Frank just blusters, says nothing, only argument was that Congress supports Hillary (so what) and was done. Took all that time to say the same thing. What did you learn from Blustery Barney?

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 13 replies Author Time Post
snowy owl Apr 2016 OP
Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #1
Snotcicles Apr 2016 #11
Dem2 Apr 2016 #2
daleanime Apr 2016 #3
Dem2 Apr 2016 #4
daleanime Apr 2016 #5
snowy owl Apr 2016 #6
Dem2 Apr 2016 #7
LineLineLineLineLineLineNew Reply Persuasive to you? I didn't think it would be.
snowy owl Apr 2016 #9
liberal from boston Apr 2016 #12
liberal from boston Apr 2016 #13
zazen Apr 2016 #8
snowy owl Apr 2016 #10
Please login to view edit histories.