2016 Postmortem

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)

9. Persuasive to you? I didn't think it would be.

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:02 AM

Apr 2016

Doesn't change the fact he blustered much longer and took her time.

2. If it is irrelevant, then what is the point of bringing it up?

4. So on what basis did he "win?" What did he win? "win" - your word. Does confirming your bias for Hillary constitute a "win?"

Actually, I'm not arguing. You took issue with me and said Barney "won." What did he win?

Obviously, Frank has a problem with sharing time and having to be right or O'Donnell wouldn't have had to set the rule (which he broke) of equal time. Frank just blusters, says nothing, only argument was that Congress supports Hillary (so what) and was done. Took all that time to say the same thing. What did you learn from Blustery Barney?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Barney Franks blusters again msnbc; Nina Turner gets word in edgewise [View all] snowy owl Apr 2016 OP

he's not retired, he's a bank lobbiest now Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #1

Payoff for Dodd Frank legislation? nt Snotcicles Apr 2016 #11

He really won the argument IMO Dem2 Apr 2016 #2

Definitely...... daleanime Apr 2016 #3

Agreed Dem2 Apr 2016 #4

Money was does.... daleanime Apr 2016 #5

What argument? I heard blustering. BTW, 3x the time - poor Nina! snowy owl Apr 2016 #6

Huh? Dem2 Apr 2016 #7

Persuasive to you? I didn't think it would be. snowy owl Apr 2016 #9

Go Bernie liberal from boston Apr 2016 #12

Go Bernie liberal from boston Apr 2016 #13

the Financial Services Committee was "The Barney Show" zazen Apr 2016 #8

I noticed his "self-aggrandizement" a long time ago. snowy owl Apr 2016 #10