Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: A Contested Democratic Convention Is Now a Near Statistical Certainty [View all]4ricksren
(72 posts)21. so you're saying that the superdelegates should also be counted proportionately?
in the states where bernie won the popular vote -- you're now saying
that the superdelegates should vote for bernie in proportion to the
pledged delegates?
by that logic, bernie is pretty close in superdelegates, since he's not
that far back in pledged delegates
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
152 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A Contested Democratic Convention Is Now a Near Statistical Certainty [View all]
imagine2015
Apr 2016
OP
If this happens we will see just how crooked the system is here in the U.S.
monicaangela
Apr 2016
#1
Oh FFS, if Sanders wins the nomination, he is electable. He is as electable as Clinton if not more.
Fast Walker 52
Apr 2016
#125
there are plenty of reasons that the Dems would be insane to nominate Clinton
Fast Walker 52
Apr 2016
#139
There will be no contested convention. The SDs will side with the pledged delegate leader after DC.
LonePirate
Apr 2016
#5
so you're saying that the superdelegates should also be counted proportionately?
4ricksren
Apr 2016
#21
then why did hillary have hundreds of superdelegates before even one primary vote was cast?
4ricksren
Apr 2016
#39
Someone posted an article here that Bill Clinton had strong-armed superdelegates
Samantha
Apr 2016
#63
I thought it was amazing that so many super-delegates had committed to Hillary before the first vote
Samantha
Apr 2016
#148
Well, I read the list of super-delegates and I was surprised to see lobbyists on that list
Samantha
Apr 2016
#152
The outcome is the same with or without SDs. They do not control the outcome.
LonePirate
Apr 2016
#80
There has never been an instance where the super delegates overruled the primary process
mythology
Apr 2016
#87
Yes. Whichever candidate wins the majority of pledged delegates will be the nominee.
LonePirate
Apr 2016
#93
My vote for Bernie last month proves otherwise. I simply haven't swallowed the kool-aid like others.
LonePirate
Apr 2016
#94
Side with a candidate that keeps losing primaries and is under threat of indictment?
Califonz
Apr 2016
#103
So you would prefer the SDs back the candidate who does not win the majority of pledged delegates?
LonePirate
Apr 2016
#115
Black voters will also remember that it was Hillary who tried to stop Obama from being nominated.
imagine2015
Apr 2016
#17
Nope, the whole argument rest on what's right and what's fair not some made up bullshit from the op
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#60
Those were the most fun to read about regarding history, because of the many unpredictable
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#16
Off topic, but earlier today, you were mentioned favorably and quoted today on the
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#52
Perhaps he will, I bet if you called him on air, his producers would put you right through! /nt
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#57
I get that, I know that if I called he wouldn't take my call, I am far less unbiased as you
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#66
Hillary super delegate explains why she flipped to Obama at 2008 convention
imagine2015
Apr 2016
#10
Left out of the Clinton case was that "Goldman-Sachs really wants H. Clinton" nm
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#12
The people say NO and it will be the party that is out if they continue going against the people,
Zira
Apr 2016
#98
Hillary Clinton, the former Senator from Wall Street. Just what we need. LOL
imagine2015
Apr 2016
#18
He's got a long history of writing loony pro-Bernie articles that do silly things with numbers.
DanTex
Apr 2016
#113
the outsider who tried to hijack a party after 73 yrs of ignoring it will go back to the senate nt
msongs
Apr 2016
#43
The super power origin stories will be most interesting and will involve radioactive money!
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#56
i believe the superdelegates vote on the first ballot with the pledged delegates, thus
4ricksren
Apr 2016
#25
You're entitled to your own opinions, you aren't entitled to your own facts.
shadowandblossom
Apr 2016
#24
A professor of English? That's always who I go to first for my political news... nt
anotherproletariat
Apr 2016
#34
you can't have it both ways: the PURPOSE of superdelegates was to override the will of the voters
4ricksren
Apr 2016
#41
A major purpose of the super delegates is to protect their own asses by supported whichever ....
imagine2015
Apr 2016
#50
Well, no, the purpose was to prevent a plurality candidate from getting the nomination
Recursion
Apr 2016
#89
Clearly the majority of Democrats want Hillary as their Democratic candidate.
LuvLoogie
Apr 2016
#96
The two party system is a result of our constitutional process of passing legislation
LuvLoogie
Apr 2016
#102
it's only to override the will of the voters if the voters do something stupid
Fast Walker 52
Apr 2016
#114
Super delegates who promised to vote for her will unless they change their minds and vote for Bernie
imagine2015
Apr 2016
#88
If she wins the popular vote and delegate count (even if not a clinch) then I want the supers...
Bread and Circus
Apr 2016
#77
If just 40% of Sanders' supporters vote for Hillary in the GE she can win it without the rest.
Jitter65
Apr 2016
#118
It is foolish to believe that most of the remaining superdelegates will not fall in line and support
Freddie Stubbs
Apr 2016
#123
uh no... he would ONLY do that if he ends up with more real votes in the primary
Fast Walker 52
Apr 2016
#126