Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

think

(11,641 posts)
68. The facts are Eric Holder prosecuted less white collar crime than his predecessors.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:53 AM
Apr 2016

One can make all the technical legal excuses for him one wants.

I understand it's difficult. But still. The results speak for themselves:

US Prosecution of White Collar Crime Hits 20-Year Low: Report

Federal prosecution of white-collar crime has hit a 20-year low, according to a new report on Department of Justice data. The analysis of thousands of records by Syracuse University shows a more than 36 percent decline in such prosecutions since the middle of the Clinton administration, when the decline first began.

In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, prosecutions ticked up slightly, but then dropped. Landing amid calls from Democratic presidential candidates for more Wall Street prosecutions, the report notes that the projected number of prosecutions this year is 12 percent less than last year and 29 percent less than five years ago.

“The decline in federal white-collar crime prosecutions does not necessarily indicate there has been a decline in white-collar crime,” Syracuse researchers note. “Rather, it may reflect shifting enforcement policies by each of the administrations and the various agencies.”...

http://www.ibtimes.com/us-prosecution-white-collar-crime-hits-20-year-low-report-2037160



Hell. It was Holder that admitted part of his reasoning was thy were too big to jail:



“I am concerned that the size of some of these institutions becomes so large that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them when we are hit with indications that if you do prosecute, if you do bring a criminal charge, it will have a negative impact on the national economy, perhaps even the world economy,” Holder said, according to The Hill. “And I think that is a function of the fact that some of these institutions have become too large.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/06/eric-holder-banks-too-big_n_2821741.html


For me it's pretty obvious Eric Holder chose to go soft on prosecuting bank crimes. You don't get welcome backed to a job defending bank crimes if you are the one that helped hurt the banks. It's not that hard to figure out.
I wish she would publish a book of those speeches. They would sell like hot cakes under "Self Help" Impedimentus Apr 2016 #1
LOL, I'm surprised she hasn't, the way she likes to bring in the money! nt 2cannan Apr 2016 #4
Doesn't matter, they still support her here Politicalboi Apr 2016 #2
If she told me to "cut it out" I'd probably do the opposite....n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #7
If elected it's the progressives she'll be telling to "cut it out". Impedimentus Apr 2016 #9
K&R pantsonfire Apr 2016 #14
Oh yes. Remember how Obama started talking to us a few months after he was elected? Zira Apr 2016 #60
Would you take $2.3 million for speeches if it was offered to you? Renew Deal Apr 2016 #3
Yes, I would then donate 99% to charity... pantsonfire Apr 2016 #5
That's not what they "offered", it's what her minimum "fee" was. 2cannan Apr 2016 #10
Yeah, it got a laugh, but she was being disingenious...n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #11
So? Renew Deal Apr 2016 #18
So??...... pantsonfire Apr 2016 #25
That's nice. Renew Deal Apr 2016 #30
Are you saying you work for the FEC? TM99 Apr 2016 #39
I'll take your wordsmithing over Hillarys - but the content of the speech is not why they pay her. Juicy_Bellows Apr 2016 #12
Exactly....btw...where is that last gif from? n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #13
It's a Giger drawing someone animated. Juicy_Bellows Apr 2016 #15
I'll check him out, thanks, and yeah I agree. n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #17
Yes. But I wouldn't expect voters to trust me in regulating those banks afterwards. They think Apr 2016 #31
Fck Yes, but I wouldnt then run for presedent. She has no shame. jack_krass Apr 2016 #72
She has unique experience to get that pay, like athletes, entertainers. Hoyt Apr 2016 #6
Can we pay to hear her insights? n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #8
Yes, though you can get them for free at 9PM tonight. Renew Deal Apr 2016 #19
She's going to release her transcripts tonight?! wow. n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #22
"People pay to hear her insight" SoLeftIAmRight Apr 2016 #35
And then expect the American people to trust her to protect the American peoples interest's think Apr 2016 #36
And she has earned and deserves JanetLovesObama Apr 2016 #16
Do we deserve to be left in the dark about what she said? n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #20
She made those speeches as a private citizen. Why would we deserve to know what she said? Arkansas Granny Apr 2016 #24
Because she made them to corporations that hugely impact all our lifes...n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #26
Do you demand to see transcripts of speeches made by others who speak to those corporations? Arkansas Granny Apr 2016 #27
Yes, I do......n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #28
The gun corps effects my life 10x more than Wall Street. Sanders is speaking to a certain groups... uponit7771 Apr 2016 #66
If a group pays you to give them a speech, then the content COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #33
Because the moment you go from being a private citizen TM99 Apr 2016 #40
I keep hearing "quid pro quo" as if it meant something. Please point out COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #49
Stopping feigning ignorance. TM99 Apr 2016 #51
I asked for specifics, but all I got was "well, gee, it's COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #55
Well gee, all I got was TM99 Apr 2016 #61
And Goldman Sachs appreciates her refusal to support a new Glass Steagall. They can't even pass the think Apr 2016 #38
+1 uponit7771 Apr 2016 #63
Hey, Let's not insuinate that Hillary is a corporate Whore beedle Apr 2016 #21
That's sexist, my god.....you are soooo offensive. n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #23
That describes crony capitalism perfectly. polichick Apr 2016 #43
And professional athletes earn more in a season COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #29
And that is relevant to this discussion how exactly? SocialLibFiscalCon Apr 2016 #41
Are you sbuggesting that she is not a private citizen? And, BTW, I assume COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #48
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #50
OK, Got it. Both Obama and Hillary were/are on the COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #54
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #56
I hope your fantasies COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #57
Eric Holder. eom/ think Apr 2016 #52
Cryptic but not highly informative. COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #53
Eric Holder was soft on Wall Street bank crimes. He's going back to defend the very criminal banks think Apr 2016 #65
As an attorney I can tell you that what may appear to be COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #67
The facts are Eric Holder prosecuted less white collar crime than his predecessors. think Apr 2016 #68
ain't nothin' but a thing tk2kewl Apr 2016 #32
Oh, that's so cute. Did you learn that at COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #34
Learned to rhyme at home about 47 yrs ago tk2kewl Apr 2016 #45
I learned that it's wonderful to bring kids' skills to an COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #47
I feel sorry for the people who had to sit through them without a mute button nt BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #37
The relevant issue is whether those fees affect her policymaking decisions, since TheDormouse Apr 2016 #42
K&R pantsonfire Apr 2016 #44
Yeah but like Hillary says... SHRED Apr 2016 #46
Most basketball stars make in 12 games more than most of make in a lifetime. nt Jitter65 Apr 2016 #58
not many basketball stars run for president Rosa Luxemburg Apr 2016 #62
And they provide a service, entertainment. What service does Hillary provide in a speech? CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #64
A basketball player's talent provides value to those paying them. What value does Hill's ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2016 #69
and she was underpaid uponit7771 Apr 2016 #59
underpaid? What should they have "offered"? n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #70
a lot more uponit7771 Apr 2016 #71
Like a million or so? n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #73
20 million per speech minimum 10 per minute... uponit7771 Apr 2016 #74
damn...what about Bill? the same or less? more? n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #75
Little less, he's less influential than she is... uponit7771 Apr 2016 #76
That makes sense...20 mil for Hill and about 15 for Bill...per ten minutes? n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #77
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton Made More...»Reply #68