Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gothmog

(145,241 posts)
4. The only way to destroy Citizens United is for a Democrat to be POTUS
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:15 PM
Apr 2016

President Obama was against Citizens United but had to use a super pac in 2012 to keep the contest close. Hillary Clinton is against Citizens United and has committed to only appoint SCOTUS justices who will vote to overturn this decision https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/05/14/hillary-clintons-litmus-test-for-supreme-court-nominees-a-pledge-to-overturn-citizens-united/

Hillary Clinton told a group of her top fundraisers Thursday that if she is elected president, her nominees to the Supreme Court will have to share her belief that the court's 2010 Citizens United decision must be overturned, according to people who heard her remarks.

Clinton's emphatic opposition to the ruling, which allowed corporations and unions to spend unlimited sums on independent political activity, garnered the strongest applause of the afternoon from the more than 200 party financiers gathered in Brooklyn for a closed-door briefing from the Democratic candidate and her senior aides, according to some of those present.

"She got major applause when she said would not name anybody to the Supreme Court unless she has assurances that they would overturn" the decision, said one attendee, who, like others, requested anonymity to describe the private session.

If the make-up of the court does not change by 2017, four of the justices will be 78 years of age or older by the time the next president is inaugurated.

This is the only practical way to undo the damage done by Citizen United in that it will be impossible to get a constitutional amendment through congress and the states to undo this decision. That means that if you want to get rid of Citizens United, then one must support a candidate who can win in 2016 and support the most viable general election candidate.

Sanders is a very weak general election candidate who would be killed in a general election with negative ads. The only safe way to get rid of Citizens United is to elect a Democrat to be POTUS
Hillary is on record against CU. And she has seen, and talked about the problems Lucinda Apr 2016 #1
One Question noretreatnosurrender Apr 2016 #3
She's just gonna do it this one last time... tk2kewl Apr 2016 #5
Yes. And it's nonsense. Lucinda Apr 2016 #8
Corruption? noretreatnosurrender Apr 2016 #10
She spoke at conferences and received a fee for it. These things happen every day. Lucinda Apr 2016 #12
I'll try again noretreatnosurrender Apr 2016 #13
Nope. And if there was evidence of any, the world would have heard about it. Lucinda Apr 2016 #14
Thank you for proving noretreatnosurrender Apr 2016 #16
Your explanation nails it exactly. EndElectoral Apr 2016 #23
........ daleanime Apr 2016 #31
If Big Special Interest Money doesn't corrupt the process, why oppose it? Armstead Apr 2016 #30
because that lets them yell about how the Sanderinistas will keep us from overthrowing CU MisterP Apr 2016 #2
The only way to destroy Citizens United is for a Democrat to be POTUS Gothmog Apr 2016 #4
So you want the candidate that would renominate Merick Garland??? revbones Apr 2016 #26
+1 daleanime Apr 2016 #33
Clinton has a litmus test for SCOTUS appointees Gothmog Apr 2016 #6
Why is Hillary Taking All the Money noretreatnosurrender Apr 2016 #7
She isn't. Lucinda Apr 2016 #9
Nobody said it was illegal. We just said it was corrupt. nt revbones Apr 2016 #28
I'd like to struggle along on the money a POTUS makes for a little while Armstead Apr 2016 #32
The cover up succeeded. creon Apr 2016 #11
We're also turning against progressive taxation now, QC Apr 2016 #15
Funny Isn't It noretreatnosurrender Apr 2016 #17
Funny weird not funny haha. QC Apr 2016 #21
Yes, Funny Weird noretreatnosurrender Apr 2016 #22
Lol, Greenwald agreed with Citizens United. nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #18
You Didn't Know That Already? noretreatnosurrender Apr 2016 #19
Of course I knew nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #20
The worst consequence of Hillary beating Sanders azmom Apr 2016 #24
Check out this thread noretreatnosurrender Apr 2016 #25
Right, 'if you can’t prove that Hillary changed her vote in exchange elleng Apr 2016 #27
Bernie and us Politicalboi Apr 2016 #29
The Clintons are the past...Bernie is the future. nt haikugal Apr 2016 #35
In this race there is a clown car one Republican and a progressive Democrat Skink Apr 2016 #34
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»To Protect Hillary Clinto...»Reply #4