2016 Postmortem

bvf

(6,604 posts)

164. Why can't you alert? Oh, right.

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 10:26 PM

Apr 2016

Last edited Sat Apr 23, 2016, 12:00 AM - Edit history (1)

Gee. You should save those for when you've got a case, huh?

ETA:

See how easy that was? I added the period just for you.

No thanks necessary. It's more important that you just be given the chance to let off steam now and then.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

165 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Yes, the continued use of "coronation" and "queen" is sexist. [View all] moriah Apr 2016 OP

Nope! "coronation" is not sex- or gender-specific amborin Apr 2016 #1

bush2 RobertEarl Apr 2016 #70

Obviously not - and it's either king or queen... JackRiddler Apr 2016 #72

No it's not. That's just not objectively true. CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #2

With the possibility of Republicans having multiple ballots... moriah Apr 2016 #6

Chelsea doesn't seem to show the kind of ambition her parents do. CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #10

I suspect she has her own quiet ambitions about things she'd like to do. moriah Apr 2016 #17

They do not refer to her sex. One refers to the idea that jwirr Apr 2016 #3

Here ya go: bvf Apr 2016 #4

Just because I have my opinion, and expressed it.... moriah Apr 2016 #13

Way to not stand by your words. Not very admirable. bvf Apr 2016 #16

I assume you alert on everything that offends you, then? moriah Apr 2016 #19

Only when I think something violates ToS. bvf Apr 2016 #29

Not everyone chooses to use the alert system. moriah Apr 2016 #30

So, you're just doing your part to help make DU suck. bvf Apr 2016 #86

Naw, the people who make personal attacks without apology and juries that let even that go.... moriah Apr 2016 #87

It clearly was anything *but* bait. bvf Apr 2016 #89

So you're being honest and you're admitting you're sexist? dlwickham Apr 2016 #64

Nothing gets past you, does it, Einstein? bvf Apr 2016 #85

and the results are in! yuiyoshida Apr 2016 #140

Thanks, yuiyoshida. n/t bvf Apr 2016 #160

This is absurd. If we can talk about the Bush royal family, we can talk about Hillary's coronation. reformist2 Apr 2016 #5

Three from the same family does push limits. moriah Apr 2016 #11

OMFG vintx Apr 2016 #7

Sadly I think not... Yurovsky Apr 2016 #133

I agree mythology Apr 2016 #8

WOW, you hillayrites take sexism to new heights angstlessk Apr 2016 #9

no...and on the other hand...'anointed' was apparently seen as too religious... islandmkl Apr 2016 #12

I'm cool with annointed, that was clearly part of monarchy either way. ;) n/t moriah Apr 2016 #14

The reason it is considered sexist Haveadream Apr 2016 #15

Thank you for putting it into better words. moriah Apr 2016 #20

Restoration of the Royal Couple Armstead Apr 2016 #120

So when we (democrats) said it about Bush? northernsouthern Apr 2016 #79

No because he was born into dynastic wealth, privilege and political connections Haveadream Apr 2016 #91

Thank you!!!!! all american girl Apr 2016 #145

Thanks, all american girl! Haveadream Apr 2016 #150

Nah. The reason something is sexist is because someone is and means it as sexist, not because KPN Apr 2016 #92

But this is not an inherited title Haveadream Apr 2016 #98

One can, however, attack that experience on its record. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #136

Enough She is qualified runaway hero Apr 2016 #149

What a nasty piece of work that article is... Lucinda Apr 2016 #18

Isn't it? LisaM Apr 2016 #67

Ok. I promise not to use queen or coronatio... actslikeacarrot Apr 2016 #21

Coronation isn't sexist and it has been used many times before. basselope Apr 2016 #22

Thank you. vintx Apr 2016 #24

She and her supporters haven't really claimed it's her turn dflprincess Apr 2016 #25

Thanks for referencing that debate, I appreciate it. I mean that. moriah Apr 2016 #32

I don't believe Obama HAD a cult, but he does now. basselope Apr 2016 #33

I'll settle for warmonger in that case. nt Live and Learn Apr 2016 #23

Yeah, that one's pretty gender-neutral Art_from_Ark Apr 2016 #28

As the old saying goes, "If the crown fits . . " Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #43

Lol +1 northernsouthern Apr 2016 #80

You know that "monger", according to the urban dictionary, Vattel Apr 2016 #111

Been around for a long time hobbit709 Apr 2016 #123

lol, I know what it means, but some Hillary supporters don't Vattel Apr 2016 #157

Lol SheenaR Apr 2016 #26

Fail Marrah_G Apr 2016 #27

Why do Clinton people parse words? Why not just discuss issues? snowy owl Apr 2016 #31

Probably because the reason for the post was use of an offending phrase Haveadream Apr 2016 #41

Ok, I get that. But still, the modern connotation is relevant to today. snowy owl Apr 2016 #46

There is no modern connotation of "coronation" which does not mean Haveadream Apr 2016 #49

Nonsense. Happens at Homecoming at every high school jberryhill Apr 2016 #93

Is this a response to Chelsea's comment about "They are not electing a King"? glinda Apr 2016 #34

My post, or the Salon article? Nt moriah Apr 2016 #35

Salon referencing. I did not read it but found it odd glinda Apr 2016 #55

Exactly! Just like everything negative about her mindwalker_i Apr 2016 #36

I never denigrated Bernie supporters in that fashion. moriah Apr 2016 #39

Cool. Many have, and I seriously wonder where the term BernieBro mindwalker_i Apr 2016 #78

Not really, since I have used "coronation" and "King" Kelvin Mace Apr 2016 #37

make sure to let Camille Paglia know she is sexist since she wrote the piece! m-lekktor Apr 2016 #38

You might want to take a look at history…. Luminous Animal Apr 2016 #40

A touch more recent than medieval Europe, which is what I referenced. moriah Apr 2016 #42

That would be the 15th century. Luminous Animal Apr 2016 #44

Because the Salon article I referenced was clearly, to any person with knowledge of that timeframe.. moriah Apr 2016 #47

Perhaps you linked to the wrong article. Paglia says nothing about Elizabeth. Luminous Animal Apr 2016 #52

Queen, cult, idol worship.... but hey, maybe Elizabethan politics wasn't your gig. Nt moriah Apr 2016 #60

Hey maybe you should try to be honest. Luminous Animal Apr 2016 #73

You lost me... northernsouthern Apr 2016 #83

She had to surrender herself, as an astute political move, into the idol of the "virginity cult" moriah Apr 2016 #96

There's nothing in that article which is similar to Elizabeth I muriel_volestrangler Apr 2016 #122

Again... northernsouthern Apr 2016 #139

For the queen of the queen of the Democrats, my homegirl Hillary. frylock Apr 2016 #45

I am still cringing over that one. moriah Apr 2016 #48

The most liberal? Down with Sandanistas?!!!! vintx Apr 2016 #115

Hypersensitive hyperbolic thin skinned nonsense AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #50

Wolf! Wolf! Bjornsdotter Apr 2016 #51

Correct me if I'm wrong... Hillary is a woman, isn't she? lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #53

I believe Hillary has actually emphasized that she is a woman - as a reason to vote for her. djean111 Apr 2016 #57

Oh stop Rebkeh Apr 2016 #54

boy, you're just all filled with wrongness wiht this post notadmblnd Apr 2016 #56

Now this, this I alert on. Don't call me a fucking paid shill. moriah Apr 2016 #65

I didn't say you were paid. notadmblnd Apr 2016 #69

I've been here since 2008. I have served on MIRT and have over 10k posts. moriah Apr 2016 #71

If you have over 10K posts, Art_from_Ark Apr 2016 #100

Okay, I didn't pay attention to my count normally, but someone mentioned a post anniversary moriah Apr 2016 #128

Jury went 4-3 to leave alone, but you still ought to have the decency... moriah Apr 2016 #74

I don't feel I owe an apology. notadmblnd Apr 2016 #81

Read the edit of my second post for my full explanation. I don't generally ignore LT posters... moriah Apr 2016 #82

No, there was scarcasm in your original post. notadmblnd Apr 2016 #84

Why don't you post the jury results bvf Apr 2016 #88

Sure, was acually tkinda confused on one answer. moriah Apr 2016 #95

You should learn not to alert just because your feelings are hurt. bvf Apr 2016 #107

I alerted because, at oine point in tye distant past... moriah Apr 2016 #125

I'll say it once more: It wasn't bait. bvf Apr 2016 #135

And I will say it again: Yes, it, was. moriah Apr 2016 #137

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #161

That alerter wasn't me, but I wish a could alert on you calling them a moron. moriah Apr 2016 #163

Why can't you alert? Oh, right. bvf Apr 2016 #164

Oh, since you edited it I can? Let me do that now. Nt. moriah Apr 2016 #165

I am sure Queen Elizabeth would beg to differ. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #58

huh? Should she be referred to as the Coronation of the King? 2banon Apr 2016 #59

I agree Dem2 Apr 2016 #61

It was often used for Romney in 2012 . . . StrayKat Apr 2016 #62

I think I'll keep using coronation. HassleCat Apr 2016 #63

I have been on the fence on this one. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #66

Well, jeez, you know, what isn't sexist? tex-wyo-dem Apr 2016 #68

Paglia can choke on her own bile. It's not a coronation if a candidate is winning by a country mile. Beacool Apr 2016 #75

The election system is the worst of all modern nations. She has taken advantage of rhett o rick Apr 2016 #76

Oh please, enough with the eternal whining. Beacool Apr 2016 #99

As in libodem Apr 2016 #77

Too fuckin' bad. Splinter Cell Apr 2016 #90

Feminism is not a parlor game. Peace Patriot Apr 2016 #94

great post! n/t PaulaFarrell Apr 2016 #113

Well done! Bjornsdotter Apr 2016 #142

Wonderfully written post! All in it together Apr 2016 #151

that's another tremendously dangerous thing--that it hollows out feminism MisterP Apr 2016 #155

Brava, Peace Patriot! Amaril Apr 2016 #156

Agreed. nolawarlock Apr 2016 #97

'fraid not. Ed Suspicious Apr 2016 #101

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #102

A monarchy, atavistic? Bad Dog Apr 2016 #103

Face it, she hung not just her hat, but her entire wardrobe, on the idea that somehow just silvershadow Apr 2016 #104

If everything is sexist then nothing is. This is ridiculous and a desperate shoehorn TheKentuckian Apr 2016 #105

Surely you'll let us have Dynastic Presidency then. TalkingDog Apr 2016 #106

No, it's not. Scootaloo Apr 2016 #108

Want 'em to use the words "coronation" and "monarch" instead? bjo59 Apr 2016 #109

berniebros still a-ok 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #110

Sexist? pinebox Apr 2016 #112

Yes, it is. nt LexVegas Apr 2016 #114

1. "coronation" is gender-neutral Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2016 #116

I'm not sure if I would see it as sexist for the reasons mentioned Nonhlanhla Apr 2016 #117

So, in a similar situation we couldn't use "coronation" and "king?" Vinca Apr 2016 #118

Trashing thread, thanks. closeupready Apr 2016 #119

Easily solved by the use of the gender neutral word 'Regent' Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #121

Bernie's got a solid health care plan that includes everyone, even the under insured. What's HRC DebDoo Apr 2016 #124

Anything to piss off Hillary supporters. It's a bit juvenile, but it motivates the Berners Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #126

Fully concur rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #127

And with that, ladies and gentlemen, the overeager use of the "sexism" accusation has finally been Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #129

Another steaming load of gender-baiting. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #130

Camille Pagila ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #131

Enough of calling everything "sexist". You are going to destroy that term, it will mean nothing pdsimdars Apr 2016 #132

They already have.... Yurovsky Apr 2016 #134

Hillbot's really classy, too, FYI. moriah Apr 2016 #154

Just more trash... quickesst Apr 2016 #138

Do you know what happened to the boy who cried wolf? Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #141

The same lack of mental discipline and education leading to "Messiah" in reference to Obama LanternWaste Apr 2016 #143

Silly. Orsino Apr 2016 #144

Stop. runaway hero Apr 2016 #146

no it isn't. With that logic she would be above all criticism because she's a woman. Cobalt Violet Apr 2016 #147

Please ask a multitude of people Aerows Apr 2016 #148

where does this pitousness come from? MisterP Apr 2016 #152

Queen refers to the Clinton Dynasty. There was a Bush Dynasty and there's WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2016 #153

Al Gore was elected VP twice. The main job of VP is to be next in line. Eric J in MN Apr 2016 #158

Nope. "Coronation" has been used for men, like Bush. In that case it's "King." Arugula Latte Apr 2016 #159

You're simply wrong about Gore. Jim Lane Apr 2016 #162