2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)If You Don’t Think Paul Manafort Can Get Trump Elected, You Don’t Know Paul Manafort [View all]
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by mcar (a host of the 2016 Postmortem forum).
Mar-a-Lago, Donald Trumps palace, is impressive by the standards of Palm Beachless so when judged against the abodes of the worlds autocrats. It doesnt, for instance, quite compare with Mezhyhirya, the gilded estate of deposed Ukrainian President Victor Yanukovych. Trump may have 33 bathrooms and three bomb shelters, but his mansion lacks a herd of ostrich, a galleon parked in a pond, and a set of golden golf clubs. Yet the two properties are linked, not just in ostentatious spirit, but by the presence of one man. Trump and Yanukovych have shared the same political brain, an operative named Paul Manafort.
Ukrainians use the term political technologist as a favored synonym for electoral consultant. Trump turned to Manafort for what seemed at first a technical task: Manafort knows how to bullwhip and wheedle delegates at a contested convention. Hes done it before, assisting Gerald Ford in stifling Ronald Reagans insurgency at the GOPs summer classic of 1976. In the conventions that followed, the Republican Party often handed Manafort control of the program and instructed him to stage-manage the show. He produced the morning-in-America convention of 1984 and the Bob Dole nostalgia-thon of 1996.
Given Manaforts experience and skill set, it never made sense that he would be limited to such a narrow albeit crucial task as delegate accumulation. Indeed, it didnt take long before he attempted to seize control of the Trump operationmanaging the budget, buying advertising, steering Trump toward a teleprompter and away from flaming his opponents, appearing on air as a primary surrogate.
Some saw the hiring of Manafort as desperate, as Trump reaching for a relic from the distant past in the belated hope of compensating for a haphazard campaign infrastructure. In fact, securing Manafort was a coup. He is among the most significant political operatives of the past 40 years, and one of the most effective. He has revolutionized lobbying several times over, though he self-consciously refrains from broadcasting his influence. Unlike his old business partners, Roger Stone and Lee Atwater, you would never describe Manafort as flamboyant. He stays in luxury hotels, but orders room service and churns out memos. When he does venture from his suite for dinner with a group, hell sit at the end of the table and say next to nothing, giving the impression that he reserves his expensive opinions for private conversations with his clients. Manafort is a person who doesnt necessarily show himself. Theres nothing egotistical about him, says the economist Anders Aslund, who advised the Ukrainian government. The late Washington Post columnist Mary McGrory described him as having a smooth, noncommittal manner, though she also noted his aggrieved brown eyes. Despite his decades of amassing influence in Washington and other global capitals, hes never been the subject of a full magazine profile. He distributes quotes to the press at the time and place of his choosing, which prior to his arrival on the Trump campaign, was almost never. (Indeed, he did not respond to requests to comment for this story.)
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/04/paul_manafort_isn_t_a_gop_retread_he_s_made_a_career_of_reinventing_tyrants.html
It's important to remind ourselves from time to time who the real enemy is, and what we'll be up against...