Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

(13,718 posts)

5. I forgot to mention that

Sun May 1, 2016, 03:37 PM

May 2016

In the example in the OP, the difference between the machine and hand count represented an 18.4% difference for that particular machine.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What is your interpretation of the Chicago audit of Democratic primary election results? [View all] Time for change May 2016 OP

based on what we've seen so far mooseprime May 2016 #1

Not a matter for interpretation. A 70 vote discrepancy is fact. Kip Humphrey May 2016 #2

Only those who benefit from cheating would resist an audit. senz May 2016 #3

I'm waiting to see Bernie Sanders' challenge... brooklynite May 2016 #4

I'm not close enough to Bernie to know the answer to that Time for change May 2016 #6

I didn't, because I don't know the issue... brooklynite May 2016 #7

Any American who values democracy would care. senz May 2016 #9

Anyone would care if it was true...and not another conspiracy theory brooklynite May 2016 #10

But we won't know until they investigate. senz May 2016 #13

Also Time for change May 2016 #14

I forgot to mention that Time for change May 2016 #5

Because MFM008 May 2016 #8

That's what the Republicans said in 2000 and 2004. senz May 2016 #11

This is very interesting Time for change May 2016 #15