Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

moriah

(8,311 posts)
Mon May 2, 2016, 04:30 PM May 2016

Blast from the past: DU's old rules! [View all]

https://web.archive.org/web/20110721225652/http://www.democraticunderground.com/forums/rules_detailed.html

For Civility (talking about and to members of Democratic Underground)


The administrators of Democratic Underground are working to provide a place where progressives can share ideas and debate in an atmosphere of mutual respect. Despite our best efforts, some of our members often stray from this ideal and cheapen the quality of discourse for everyone else. Unfortunately, it is simply impossible to write a comprehensive set of rules forbidding every type of antisocial behavior. The fact that the rules do not forbid a certain type of post does not automatically make an uncivil post appropriate, nor does it imply that the administrators approve of disrespectful behavior. Every member of this community has a responsibility to participate in a respectful manner, and to help foster an atmosphere of thoughtful discussion. In this regard, we strongly advise that our members exercise a little common decency, rather than trying to parse the message board rules to figure out what type of antisocial behavior is not forbidden.

Do not post personal attacks or engage in name-calling against other individual members of this discussion board. Even very mild personal attacks are forbidden.

Do not hurl insults at other individual members of this message board. Do not tell someone, "shut up," "screw you," "fuck off," "in your face," or some other insult.

Do not call another member of this message board a liar, and do not call another member's post a lie. You are, of course, permitted to point out when a post is untrue or factually incorrect.

Do not publicly accuse another member of this message board of being a disruptor, conservative, Republican, FReeper, or troll, or do not otherwise imply they are not welcome on Democratic Underground. If you think someone is a disruptor, click the "Alert" link below their post to let the moderators know.

Do not draw negative attention to the fact that someone is new, has a low post count, or recently became a member of Democratic Underground. Do not insinuate that because someone is new, they are a troll or disruptor.

Do not accuse entire groups of people on Democratic Underground of being conservative disruptors, or post messages which spread this type of suspicion. Do not post topics that arouse suspicion against new members, or members with low post counts.

Do not say that you are hitting the alert link to report another member. You are permitted to tell someone that you are adding them to your ignore list, provided that you actually do so.

Do not "stalk" another member from one discussion thread to another. Do not follow someone into another thread to try to continue a disagreement you had elsewhere. Do not talk negatively about an individual in a thread where they are not participating. Do not post messages with the purpose of "calling out" another member or picking a fight with another member. Do not use your signature line to draw negative attention to another member of the board.

You are permitted to post polite behavioral corrections to other members of the message board, in direct response to specific instances of incivility, provided that your comments are narrowly focused on the behavior. But you are not permitted to make broad statements about another person's behavior in general, and you are not permitted to post repeated reminders about another person's mistakes.

You are permitted to criticize public figures, who are not protected under our rules against personal attacks. However, if a public figure is a member of our community, that person is protected by our rules and you are not permitted to personally attack that person. (You are permitted to offer constructive criticism of their activities as a public figure.)

If you do not like someone, please be aware that you have the option of putting that person on your ignore list. Just click the ignore icon on one of their posts.

There are no exceptions to these civility rules. You cannot attack someone because they attacked you first, or because that person "deserved it," or because you think someone is a disruptor. We consider it a personal attack to call a liar a liar, to call a moron a moron, or to call a jerk a jerk.


I can see why Skinner thought we should grow up some and not have to live by a ton of "thou shalt not"s.

Too bad we haven't....
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wow. Almost none of those rules are followed now. onehandle May 2016 #1
Are there more or less people participating now than in 2008? Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #3
Feels like far less, but there has been a bump for the last two months. onehandle May 2016 #5
If I owned this place there is NO way I would cut out all the people who might Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #6
That's why Skinner created Discussionist. moriah May 2016 #15
Ahh yes, that place. GOP has invested in a several hundred million dollar propaganda campaign Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #17
It's hard to remember it's bullshit.... moriah May 2016 #19
We don't have a nominee until concession.. moriah May 2016 #8
Feels like less to me wildeyed May 2016 #28
Far less now than in 2008. NanceGreggs May 2016 #9
Yeah, those rules are definitely old. nolawarlock May 2016 #2
Wow! (nt) stone space May 2016 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author carolinayellowdog May 2016 #7
Kinda freaky. +1 for Jung.... I heart Jung. Nt moriah May 2016 #10
And DU grew and thrived ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #11
There was concern about transparency, biased mods, etc, from what I recall. moriah May 2016 #12
Skinner also stated ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #20
This one against me didn't get a hide. moriah May 2016 #22
One of my first hides here ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #23
I hope you did alert on that alert. moriah May 2016 #26
No, I didn't alert. NanceGreggs May 2016 #27
Early on in the jury system, wildeyed May 2016 #29
Alerting. NuclearDem May 2016 #13
They will bake us honeybuns with the brainwashing juice in it? moriah May 2016 #14
This place is gross LoverOfLiberty May 2016 #16
*blush* moriah May 2016 #21
That was when DU was a unique place, now it's just like the other places, full of bullies of Bluenorthwest May 2016 #18
They also started a site full of Freepers and Cavers. demmiblue May 2016 #24
I always thought DI was an attempt to both get ad revenue.... moriah May 2016 #25
Early this primary season a community college "blogger" who could barely string a sentence together Warren DeMontague May 2016 #30
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Blast from the past: DU's...»Reply #0