Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary demanded a Secretary of State appointment in exchange for calling off her PUMAs. [View all]gopiscrap
(23,758 posts)87. I wouldn't doubt it
if Sanders loses to her, then he should demand the Vice Presidency
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
137 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary demanded a Secretary of State appointment in exchange for calling off her PUMAs. [View all]
Attorney in Texas
May 2016
OP
So the lack of evidence is the evidence? Sounds like what the Repubs have been arguing
synergie
May 2016
#66
Actually, no. But Republicans do need to project when their tactics are called out. Well done.
synergie
May 2016
#136
You call that racist, I call it racist to assume that her calling out drug dealers as predators . .
brush
May 2016
#131
Horsetrading Cabinet positions is a common practice, but it's illegal, so everyone denies it
leveymg
May 2016
#133
"Sanders is not making any similar demand". Yet, you forgot to include the 'yet'.
procon
May 2016
#5
Wow you truly are a piece of work, threatening to report a thread because you don't like the content
insta8er
May 2016
#15
I'd rather not see accusations of illegality without proof levied against Democrats
Tarc
May 2016
#45
Trust me she has violated many laws and helped to ensure that people with money
Live and Learn
May 2016
#25
Who you calling boy? Racist term but I am sure you will deny being one. nt
Live and Learn
May 2016
#47
Yeah, you don't have much credibility since you seem to enjoy many works of fiction
synergie
May 2016
#71
I think it is a lie that Clinton had anything to do with PUMA one way or another. PUMA of 2016
seabeyond
May 2016
#8
When is he going to magnanimous to liberals? Seems it only applies to conservatives otherwise
TheKentuckian
May 2016
#93
Sounds legit. Absent evidence to the contrary, I will have to assume it is true.
silvershadow
May 2016
#23
Sounds false. Absent evidence to the contrary, I will have to assume it's made up crap.
Fla Dem
May 2016
#62
Sure, and Bernie Sanders and Jane have a history of fraud and birbery. Absent evidence
synergie
May 2016
#68
This thread goes a long way in explaining Texas. This poster calls him/herself an
Trust Buster
May 2016
#54
Can you provide a source for your title? If not, why should anyone read anything beneath it? ...
1StrongBlackMan
May 2016
#60
That is because you are a lawyer who understands why sourcing/evidence is important
Gothmog
May 2016
#105
And your evidence that she made such a demand, and that Bernie is not making demands?
synergie
May 2016
#65
When have we ever suggest a President hire someone that exclusively works against them?
seabeyond
May 2016
#74
Your reply has nothing to do with my post. I have no expectation you voting Clinton for any reason.
seabeyond
May 2016
#81
Let's go there. I'm a white, middle-aged working class white guy with three draft age sons.
lumberjack_jeff
May 2016
#85
Someone who did behave, to use your word as "shitty" as Tulis did. Refresh my memory,
synergie
May 2016
#90
When did Hillary indulge in stupid antics and say utterly false and homophobic things?
lumberjack_jeff
May 2016
#98
As you can see, there are all sorts of ex post facto cover stories being concocted in denial
tularetom
May 2016
#101
Well, now. Aren't you just the lying sack. Hmmm? (read with your best church lady voice)
Squinch
May 2016
#107
Peesonally, I have more faith in both Obama and Hillary when these decisions
Thinkingabout
May 2016
#108
"Party Rules" mean a lot to someone who wasn't a member of the Party until last year?
brooklynite
May 2016
#119
Take down your post. You look beyond foolish for making up stuff without any evidence! Is this
riversedge
May 2016
#127