Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Oh No! Not a Special Prosecutor [View all]awake
(3,226 posts)2. Well your memory is a bit off it was "whitewater" not "watergate"
Whitewater involved the Clitons and Watergate involved Nixon
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Funny, because I don't see ANY meat in that OP whatsoever .. just more BS innuendo n/t
SFnomad
May 2016
#15
FFS, you people really are desperate, aren't you? Sounds like something you'd hear on Faux "News" nt
SFnomad
May 2016
#24
No real doubt about it. If foreign spies didn't get in, they're probably in a prison right now
Bob41213
May 2016
#66
Wash his hands of WHAT? You still haven't said, just vague innuendo in an apparent....
George II
May 2016
#52
the mechanism of a McCarthyist campaign -- innuendo. "Who needs evidence?"_RNC
Bill USA
May 2016
#98
Libby supposedly got in trouble for lying, not for leaking as I understand it.
JDPriestly
May 2016
#81
What exactly would her "intent" be? You think she was trying to disseminate secret info to
Hoyt
May 2016
#9
And why would she do that? IF there was anything going on, I think it will be some staffers, not
Hoyt
May 2016
#60
Interesting that you're saying having access to information trumps knowing how to handle it...
MrMickeysMom
May 2016
#90
He's the one who hired her and looked the other way while she ran a rogue State Dept.
tularetom
May 2016
#14
This is a truly ignorant thread. Kenneth Starr spent millions investigating the Clinton's as a
Trust Buster
May 2016
#32
Why did you say this? I am interested because that is also where I believe this is going
Samantha
May 2016
#33
Yes, I was in my mid-20s at the time. As much as you people TRY to make this like....
George II
May 2016
#87
Lol. Ok. This thread shows you are really really knowledgeable about these things.
JTFrog
May 2016
#44
Your stupid OP is taking a turn for the worse isn't it? Might want to do a little research. n/t
JTFrog
May 2016
#50
I don't see how we aren't witnessing the Sanders campaign last desperate push.
NCTraveler
May 2016
#86