Yep, because a potential Presidential candidate who has the obligation to disclose (Reply #65)

In the discussion thread: When Will Hillary Clinton Release Her Wall Street Transcripts? [View all]

Thu May 12, 2016, 11:18 AM

COLGATE4 (14,514 posts)

65. Yep, because a potential Presidential candidate who has the obligation to disclose

his tax returns just like every other candidate for many years now hasn't done so is obviously equal to someone releasing private speeches given to private groups when she wasn't a candidate. =/=

This is the DU member formerly known as COLGATE4.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

256 replies	Author	Time	Post
When Will Hillary Clinton Release Her Wall Street Transcripts? [View all]	coffeeAM	May 2016	OP
Nevah. Nor should she. None of your business. What is Sanders hiding with tax returns?	seabeyond	May 2016	#1
I am sure that argument will go over well with the General election voters.	coffeeAM	May 2016	#8
Her transcripts matter most to those who have no intention of ever voting for her anyway.	thesquanderer	May 2016	#20
Exactly.... Only used for a tool to attack. Nt	seabeyond	May 2016	#45
Doesn't that make it a problem?	GummyBearz	May 2016	#49
Absolutely, squeaky clean, nothing to hide...	dchill	May 2016	#55
There will always be another demand. No.	seabeyond	May 2016	#106
Oh	GummyBearz	May 2016	#116
Yes, it is. Personal life that had nothing to do with govermental position. None of your business.	seabeyond	May 2016	#118
The nature and beliefs of my future commander in chief is my business	GummyBearz	May 2016	#122
Then I want to Sanders taxes, know about sending toxins to to Texas, selling his vote to Democrats.	seabeyond	May 2016	#156
Yea, someone should ask him those questions	GummyBearz	May 2016	#159
What do yu want to know?	coffeeAM	May 2016	#174
Everything	GummyBearz	May 2016	#176
What do you mean?	coffeeAM	May 2016	#181
A democratic Predidents Job is to keep wall street in check.	coffeeAM	May 2016	#123
You can see by her 2007 plan she put together to address it. More than what Sanders has.	seabeyond	May 2016	#157
Ya, now the RW can pick up on what Sanders started, not that anyone cares, just something to pound	seabeyond	May 2016	#44
Just release them and we will not have to go through this, it is that simple!	coffeeAM	May 2016	#48
"We" aren't going through anything, the Sanders people are going through it for some odd reason.	George II	May 2016	#60
No. By gosh, make your demands and expect them followed. No. I want Sanders taxes.	seabeyond	May 2016	#64
+100	spinboas	May 2016	#223
what world is this?	reddread	May 2016	#161
Why? She was a private citizen then, not serving in an elected or appointed public office . . .	brush	May 2016	#201
Message auto-removed	Name removed	May 2016	#210
Was Mitt Romney's leaked 47% remark no-one's business? nt.	polly7	May 2016	#21
all those speeches, all those thousands of attendees and waiters and no leaking?	Sheepshank	May 2016	#25
I've read that she forbade anyone but her own transcriber to keep record of a single word she	polly7	May 2016	#32
she can say what she wants, people with an agenda will do what they will	Sheepshank	May 2016	#75
Oh quit with the straw-man bullshit. I'm talking about her speeches to	polly7	May 2016	#77
your explanation was piled deep and broad here.	Sheepshank	May 2016	#79
The likes of me?	polly7	May 2016	#80
Yes, you have opinions and they often mean squat to me	Sheepshank	May 2016	#85
And yours and 'the likes of you' mean squat to me.	polly7	May 2016	#86
I've read that she allowed anyone who asked to be allowed in the room(s).	George II	May 2016	#125
Really? That's odd ........... never seen mention of that at all.	polly7	May 2016	#128
Nor I your "I've read....."	George II	May 2016	#132
I've read it HERE. Good try though. nt.	polly7	May 2016	#133
Yep. It's almost like there's nothing there.	COLGATE4	May 2016	#61
It was a gotcha moment, and no, not really. I get you are looking for a gotcha. Hey, I want to hear	seabeyond	May 2016	#46
It was more than a 'gotcha' moment.	polly7	May 2016	#47
Of course it became a gotcha moment. So, lets demand peoples diary entry so we can really see what	seabeyond	May 2016	#62
Wtf are you going on about? Not a single reply to what I said.	polly7	May 2016	#71
WTF are you going on about. Personal earning outside of government, bad. Sanders within government	seabeyond	May 2016	#105
She was planning on running for President.	polly7	May 2016	#107
She was planning on...? Cough up personal, private stuff. Sanders not planning so hide his stuff?	seabeyond	May 2016	#110
Good god.	polly7	May 2016	#112
I know, right?	seabeyond	May 2016	#113
I'm glad you know. Exactly what ........ I have no idea. nt.	polly7	May 2016	#117
Wow, witty, .... Bah ha hahahah.	seabeyond	May 2016	#119
Wasn't meant to be witty.	polly7	May 2016	#120
I posted some of that a few months ago, it got hidden in a Burlington minute.	George II	May 2016	#126
I believe the remarks were made at an actual campaign event	LisaM	May 2016	#179
+100	spinboas	May 2016	#224
Private addresses for money to the architects of the Great Recession ought not to remain hidden.	Orsino	May 2016	#160
No it does not look corrupt. It looks like a desperate campaign looking for a gotcha, dependent	seabeyond	May 2016	#164
That's not what hiding transcripts looks like. n/t	Orsino	May 2016	#165
Nothing about hiding. All about... none of your business. See how you create your scenario. Hiding?	seabeyond	May 2016	#166
Hidden per the contracts she signed. That's her creation..	Orsino	May 2016	#167
As it should be. This was handled in normal fashion. Absolutely.	seabeyond	May 2016	#168
Normal for wealthy elites who block journalistic access...	Orsino	May 2016	#169
Speakers and their material, end of story. Again, creating a bullshit scenario.	seabeyond	May 2016	#170
What's in the transcripts that only Clinton and G-S should know? n/t	Orsino	May 2016	#171
Her personal stuff, in her personal life, that is none of your business. She does not need to	seabeyond	May 2016	#172
Giving speeches to wall street is not her personal business once she decided to run for president!	coffeeAM	May 2016	#173
Yes. It is.	seabeyond	May 2016	#192
Ya, in your dreams.	coffeeAM	May 2016	#195
What a silly comment. This was done in her personal, private world nothing to do with a gov position	seabeyond	May 2016	#197
Oh come on, you really do not believe that..	coffeeAM	May 2016	#206
Don't tell me what I believe or not. I think its petty yelling,... transcripts. Looking for a gotcha	seabeyond	May 2016	#216
What was so special in these talks to auditoriums full of G-S personnel...	Orsino	May 2016	#226
Nothing is special, and still... none of your business. People do not get to make demands of Clinton	seabeyond	May 2016	#227
Pathetic spin.	Orsino	May 2016	#230
I do not think it is spin at all. I would strongly advocate that Clinton does not buckle under your	seabeyond	May 2016	#231
I think we should demand openness of our candidates...	Orsino	May 2016	#232
I want Sanders taxes, Discussion on how grand food lines are, Theories on overthrowing SAmerica	seabeyond	May 2016	#233
This makes no sense when excusing Clinton...	Orsino	May 2016	#234
I think it is outrageous for me to demand Sanders hidden conversations on communism and	seabeyond	May 2016	#235
Nonsense.	Orsino	May 2016	#236
As I want to know Sanders Socialist/Communist positions.	seabeyond	May 2016	#237
I believe it is my business since she is running to be president of the country.	pinskinny	May 2016	#239
If we can't get those transcripts...	Orsino	May 2016	#253
She is running for the highest office in the land, and yet you tell voters "none of your business"?	NorthCarolina	May 2016	#211
You cannot take a peek into her diary, either.	seabeyond	May 2016	#212
Please...	NorthCarolina	May 2016	#213
No, I do not. Because I do not fall in with your agenda is no embarrassment at all.	seabeyond	May 2016	#215
that ugly word democracy is so passe	reddread	May 2016	#214
Except, Clinton is the only one having these demands made on her. No other politician, ever.	seabeyond	May 2016	#217
after the massive meltdown, bailout and the dead sea that is our current economy?	reddread	May 2016	#218
Ya. I dunno. That would be the Repugs to go after. I get Sanders and his "Dems" are more comfortable	seabeyond	May 2016	#219
republican or Democrat, the economy matters	reddread	May 2016	#220
I do not get your post	seabeyond	May 2016	#221
If Trump isn't going to release his taxes, I don't know that he'd make an issue over her transcripts	thesquanderer	May 2016	#2
Trump has many speech transcripts, too. Wasn't he the highest paid speaker on the circuit	blm	May 2016	#13
Hillary has transcripts of her speeches. Donald probably does not.	thesquanderer	May 2016	#18
Not the point, is it? You can shiver in your boots and entertain the RW propagandists	blm	May 2016	#22
I don't remember trump using static noise to prevent people from hearing his speeches	GummyBearz	May 2016	#56
Yep. The Former First Lady...	NewImproved Deal	May 2016	#3
A polite way for Hillary to say "Kiss My Ass".	NurseJackie	May 2016	#7
Hillary's Dislikebility factor is captured in that smug smile & quote. n/t	Merryland	May 2016	#29
Nixon x Bush	reddread	May 2016	#34
Benghaziiiiiiiiiiii!	Ohioblue22	May 2016	#42
Gee, that's always such a funny reply. It's too bad good people died though. nt.	polly7	May 2016	#50
It's also a pointless witch hunt. It can be more than one	Ohioblue22	May 2016	#83
Only when it's to her advantage so to do.	NurseJackie	May 2016	#4
This is about the millionth thread on this.	cwydro	May 2016	#5
To distract from Bernie's FEC legal issues ...	NurseJackie	May 2016	#24
Never I hope	griffi94	May 2016	#6
He ain't running for President unless I missed something...	Merryland	May 2016	#28
He's a senator	griffi94	May 2016	#30
What's breathtaking is that	laruemtt	May 2016	#9
Yep, because a potential Presidential candidate who has the obligation to disclose	COLGATE4	May 2016	#65
I don't think she will and I see no reason for her to do so.	Arkansas Granny	May 2016	#10
She's running for President and she wants our votes	dana_b	May 2016	#93
The real problem with this	SmittynMo	May 2016	#11
+ 1,000!	laruemtt	May 2016	#12
She already did while you were gone. We read them, fell asleep, and moved on.	Buzz Clik	May 2016	#14
What is crazy is Bernie and Donald are the only candidates who refused to release tax returns.	DemocratSinceBirth	May 2016	#16
What are you on about? Sanders released his 2014 return, complete and fully. 12 days after ...	ebayfool	May 2016	#94
One year of tax returns. The Clinton have released thirty!!!	DemocratSinceBirth	May 2016	#96
Could it be because they've been running for Prez for damn near 30 years, between the 2 of em?	ebayfool	May 2016	#97
Richard Nixon started the tradition of presidential candidates releasing years of tax returns.	DemocratSinceBirth	May 2016	#98
Oy! I gotta get ready for work.	ebayfool	May 2016	#99
How about when everyone else who runs for office...	yallerdawg	May 2016	#15
No one is saying she has to do it but it's in her best interest.	Lindsixo	May 2016	#104
So if we have a President Trump in November...	yallerdawg	May 2016	#108
I want her to release the transcripts of speeches up here paid for the two big banks	polly7	May 2016	#17
Actually, you don't.	COLGATE4	May 2016	#66
Yes, I do!	polly7	May 2016	#100
I'm confused. Are you a U.S. citizen?	COLGATE4	May 2016	#134
No. I'm not.	polly7	May 2016	#135
Just wanted to be clear on the facts. Is there an international agreement of some kind that	COLGATE4	May 2016	#136
I don't give a crap if there is or not, 'I', as a tax-paying citizen want to know! nt.	polly7	May 2016	#137
Do you pay taxes in the U.S. ?	COLGATE4	May 2016	#139
She gave these speeches up here - all over the place. nt.	polly7	May 2016	#140
Thanks. I was aware of that. Now, as I mentioned	COLGATE4	May 2016	#141
Do you pay taxes in Canada? nt.	polly7	May 2016	#142
No, since I'm neither a Canadian citizen nor do any business in Canada.	COLGATE4	May 2016	#144
No, I don't.	polly7	May 2016	#145
You may believe you have a 'right to know'. What do you not have is	COLGATE4	May 2016	#146
I have an absolute right to know, regardless of WHERE that person is from.	polly7	May 2016	#147
Only in your own mind. You have every right to demand things	COLGATE4	May 2016	#150
Mine and many others' minds. Only in your mind is it given that we	polly7	May 2016	#153
I said you have no right to demand. (Your words)	COLGATE4	May 2016	#154
I demand? My words??? - where exactly did I use the word 'demand'?	polly7	May 2016	#155
Uh, we all deserve to see the speeches because maybe she's hiding something she doesnt want u to see	pinskinny	May 2016	#240
Really?	COLGATE4	May 2016	#241
Considering her track record, yes really!	pinskinny	May 2016	#242
I was commenting on the depth and sophistication	COLGATE4	May 2016	#243
Seems like you need it plain and simple since you are having difficulties seeing the problem	pinskinny	May 2016	#244
Most of us have gotten past using 5th Grade logic	COLGATE4	May 2016	#245
Over analyzation has clouded your brain.	pinskinny	May 2016	#247
Simple facts like the word you want is "stare", not "stair"?	COLGATE4	May 2016	#252
Message auto-removed	Name removed	May 2016	#254
Never, because there's only one transcript.	JustABozoOnThisBus	May 2016	#19
I'd say you just hit the nail on the head.	tonyt53	May 2016	#35
Gotta love the suspension of morality...	Darkhawk32	May 2016	#23
That is what I am thinking and fear.	coffeeAM	May 2016	#39
Sure you do.	zappaman	May 2016	#63
What if there ARE NO TRANSCRIPTS?	Merryland	May 2016	#26
That must be it. As a matter of fact, I think I read that	COLGATE4	May 2016	#67
True so many people would have attended	Lindsixo	May 2016	#74
Message auto-removed	Name removed	May 2016	#209
never	oldandhappy	May 2016	#27
she is a fool if she thinks they will not get leaked	krawhitham	May 2016	#31
Its likely there are no transcripts.	procon	May 2016	#57
I believe you are right on.	COLGATE4	May 2016	#68
Never. Hillary Clinton has cornered herself into a lose-lose regards the transcripts.	PufPuf23	May 2016	#33
Bingo!	coffeeAM	May 2016	#38
yep	840high	May 2016	#131
When is someone going to come up with a valid reason for her releasing them? How do you know.....	George II	May 2016	#36
The day after Sanders releases his tax-returns. Bazinga!	DetlefK	May 2016	#37
He did already. Bazinga!	ebayfool	May 2016	#95
You have no right to see her transcripts. You'll need to look elsewhere for your ammo	Ohioblue22	May 2016	#40
She is Running for president of the United States, we the tax payers have every right!	coffeeAM	May 2016	#43
Says you. Not convincing authority.	COLGATE4	May 2016	#69
We the tax payers, not me the tax payer.	coffeeAM	May 2016	#72
Did I miss the memo where you were designated spokesperson	COLGATE4	May 2016	#73
You are wrong	Ohioblue22	May 2016	#82
?	coffeeAM	May 2016	#91
Did Nixon have a right to keep his transcripts secret? n/t	lumberjack_jeff	May 2016	#111
Nixon lol. You have zero rights to those transcripts	Ohioblue22	May 2016	#121
Hillary must release her Wall Street transcripts, so says another Bernie fan.	procon	May 2016	#41
She'll do it before I vote for her, that's all I know. n/t	brewens	May 2016	#51
not even a good try. The Democratic Party doesn't give a shit about her transcripts.	Lil Missy	May 2016	#52
Trump probably already has the transcripts, OCTOBER SURPRISE?	B Calm	May 2016	#53
In the general election when she is looking to attract certain Republicans.	Skwmom	May 2016	#54
That could very well be it! +1	B Calm	May 2016	#58
Yep. Hang on to that (new) false hope. It'll keep you warm,	COLGATE4	May 2016	#70
You'll read them in her presidential library	lumberjack_jeff	May 2016	#59
when Satan purchases a snowmobile.	yourout	May 2016	#76
Hillary is cooked	Rass	May 2016	#78
Thus Far	jamese777	May 2016	#81
Nearly 10 million dems say IM NOT WITH HER after the establishement rolled out the red carpet 4 her	coffeeAM	May 2016	#84
That nearly 13 million DEMOCRATS have said "I'm with her" tells me HRC will be the nominee.	Fla Dem	May 2016	#163
and suppressing votes too dont forget.	Lindsixo	May 2016	#196
+100	spinboas	May 2016	#222
Superdelegates have not voted yet	Rass	May 2016	#90
Don't hold your breath!	BootinUp	May 2016	#87
Its part of the vetting process and that involves looking into any possible scandal.	Lindsixo	May 2016	#114
The Republicans will release them once it's too late	Ferd Berfel	May 2016	#88
This message was self-deleted by its author	rjsquirrel	May 2016	#89
She is dragging the party through the mud and making it look bad, that is the reason!	coffeeAM	May 2016	#92
yes and we're constantly hearing about how Hillary is vetted and Bernie is not.	Lindsixo	May 2016	#101
NOBODY cares!	George II	May 2016	#115
Yup, nothing to see here, just move along folks!	coffeeAM	May 2016	#124
This message was self-deleted by its author	rjsquirrel	May 2016	#102
I don't understand what you mean	DesertRat	May 2016	#103
Not except in response to a congressional subpoena.	lumberjack_jeff	May 2016	#109
Never. nt	SusanCalvin	May 2016	#127
How about never??? Does never work for you???	Gomez163	May 2016	#129
No it does not and it should not work for anyone that values transparency!!	coffeeAM	May 2016	#138
She doesnt have to. Bernie is TOAST.	Gomez163	May 2016	#143
She doesnt have to, butshe is making the party look bad by not doing it!	coffeeAM	May 2016	#149
I see the goal posts are moving yet again, even in this thread. The	silvershadow	May 2016	#130
the "we cant" campaign becomes "we wont"	reddread	May 2016	#162
they could be a USEFUL weapon for the RIGHT wing in oct. what is she afraid of?	pansypoo53219	May 2016	#148
I saw them, I have a friend who knows the organizer. She said Wall Street folks arent evil	Jackie Wilson Said	May 2016	#151
You "saw them", did you?	MrMickeysMom	May 2016	#249
Never, nor does she need to.	SylviaD	May 2016	#152
Does she really need to?	redStateBlueHeart	May 2016	#158
There are now stories popping up about the gop looking for them. Which I'm sure they are.	Lindsixo	May 2016	#175
What stories?	coffeeAM	May 2016	#183
I saw this video.	Lindsixo	May 2016	#184
This guy is saying exactly what is gonna happen, the dems need to open their freakin eyes!	coffeeAM	May 2016	#185
Do you mind if I put thid video in the main body of the post?	coffeeAM	May 2016	#191
Not at all. I'm just passing it along.	Lindsixo	May 2016	#193
Thank you, I just have to figure out how to do it..	coffeeAM	May 2016	#194
You did it.	Rhiannon12866	May 2016	#204
I would say the day after Hell freezes over. n/t	doc03	May 2016	#177
Still waiting for the transcripts of Sanders and conversations he has had with NRA, GE,	Thinkingabout	May 2016	#178
So your basically saying Clinton will be influenced by wall street?	coffeeAM	May 2016	#186
Never said that, i know Sanders has been influenced, Sanders and others has not	Thinkingabout	May 2016	#188
ya im sure they just give 15 million away for the hell of it.	coffeeAM	May 2016	#189
Sanders has been influenced? In what alternate universe?	coffeeAM	May 2016	#198
As in voting five times against the Brady Bill after the NRA donated $18,000	Thinkingabout	May 2016	#200
Excellent vote by him considering what was attached to those bills by the establishment!	coffeeAM	May 2016	#203
We dont know anything of the sort.	Lindsixo	May 2016	#187
Yes... That's why he rated a "D-" from the NRA...	MrMickeysMom	May 2016	#248
After Romney's 47% taped remarks, I suspect	Jarqui	May 2016	#180
People keep thinking...	deathrind	May 2016	#182
never!	laserhaas	May 2016	#190
When the price is right.	Tierra_y_Libertad	May 2016	#199
Transcripts, schmanscripts...	NewImproved Deal	May 2016	#202
with Wall street?	coffeeAM	May 2016	#205
If I had to guess, late June, and they'll be boring as hell	Recursion	May 2016	#207
Message auto-removed	Name removed	May 2016	#208
I think she will release them next month.	spinboas	May 2016	#225
What has given you that idea?	primnickel	May 2016	#229
not happening	Cheese Sandwich	May 2016	#228
why would she show the world the favors she owes wall street?	pinskinny	May 2016	#238
She knows she would look terrible so she's weighed the risk and decided not to.	Logical	May 2016	#246
Ya but she looks like she is lying by not releasing them.	pinskinny	May 2016	#250
I 100% agree.	Logical	May 2016	#251
Yes she does!	primnickel	May 2016	#256
K & R	AzDar	May 2016	#255

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.