Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary: "fused and fired by fever-ridden ambition and sense of pure entitlement. IT IS HER TURN" [View all]imagine2015
(2,054 posts)20. I take it you're backing a big time loser against Trump. Hillary Clinton.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
167 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary: "fused and fired by fever-ridden ambition and sense of pure entitlement. IT IS HER TURN" [View all]
imagine2015
May 2016
OP
LOL, another idiotic "clinton hater" comment which means "did not want hill as president"
Logical
May 2016
#64
Since you insist on there being 'sides' to this, why can't you stop talking about Clinton?
randome
May 2016
#123
If it were Bernie vs. Carly Fiorina, I wonder who would be the preferred candidate?
Armstead
May 2016
#16
No, Hillary is lying about her agenda- And about the past agreements she is bound by
Baobab
May 2016
#73
Ambitious? His quiet victories as legislator wouldn't have been quiet. You are used to status quo.
snowy owl
May 2016
#87
I was surprised to read the other day that Iron Lady Margaret Thatcher did not want the Berlin Wall
Baobab
May 2016
#52
A lot of people feared a re-unified Germany in the heart of Europe for some reason.
BillZBubb
May 2016
#78
And Germany has become the leader of the EU. Merkel smarter than Thatcher by a country mile.
snowy owl
May 2016
#88
But how often are men who seek the presidency called out for their ambition?
mythology
May 2016
#104
You are wrong, it doesn not. If Elizabeth Warren were running, I would be out door to door for her.
litlbilly
May 2016
#63
Idiocy - "man" gender neutral in this case. Rex did not mean gender-specific. Distraction.
snowy owl
May 2016
#89
Indeed. I would vote for Elizabeth Warren in a second. OTOH, Hillary is a bad choice- for many reaso
Baobab
May 2016
#84
of course . . . but not relevant to this article. You've taken it and made it a distraction.
snowy owl
May 2016
#90
Your comments merely reflect your total lack of awareness of this history of democratic candidates.
Big Blue Marble
May 2016
#44
Maybe it's all you recognize? You are too wrapped up in a buzz word. Lazy. Try to look beyond...
snowy owl
May 2016
#99
If you've lived "lifetime" of it, then you have been using failed strategies. Look inward.
snowy owl
May 2016
#103
But that's the problem, Bernie is not "ambition-filled" which is why he's been successful.
snowy owl
May 2016
#86
Bernie is not. Warren is not. Perhaps Merkley is not. HRC supporters used to corruption.
snowy owl
May 2016
#93
Ambition was a problem for Richard Nixon. Men certainly face criticism for being overly ambitious
Rilgin
May 2016
#139
Then why is Hillary being extrapolated here vs the rest of people who did the same thing? Like
uponit7771
May 2016
#163
She's an accomplished professional woman who has and IS working her ass off to get elected.
KittyWampus
May 2016
#9
Former professor/amendment king/quiet victories? Clearly your worship idols. Easier than reading.
snowy owl
May 2016
#102
Not so strange "bedfellows". The Clintons and rich Republican donors to Hillary's campaign.
imagine2015
May 2016
#18
Ambition is one thing. Ambition so that you will do anything to serve it is another. I don't think
highprincipleswork
May 2016
#15
He may not have when he started this campaign, but his ego is getting bigger every day as is his
riversedge
May 2016
#54
His mandate has gotten bigger. We want him to represent us, even if some of you don't. Tell me,
highprincipleswork
May 2016
#96
"beating like rented mule" - I don't use such comparisons. I've become kinder than that. Brutality
snowy owl
May 2016
#112
How many primaries has Bernie won since the 3,000,000 came out and it has not changed?
-none
May 2016
#85
if you've seen better prose in Cosmo, you have little understanding of good writing
snowy owl
May 2016
#107
This article is an absolute dumpster fire of overly-ornamented prose.
Starry Messenger
May 2016
#110
Does anyone disagree with this comment made by the articles writer? And if so, what?
imagine2015
May 2016
#40
To me, she's an opportunist. She's had little legislative experience. Same with Obama.
snowy owl
May 2016
#116
"Because no one in the state department, Bradley Manning, has ever compromised security"
dana_b
May 2016
#140
omg - really?! This post is one for the books. YOU and your daughter have rights and knoe EVERYTHING
dana_b
May 2016
#144
Someday we'll have a progressive/liberal woman running for President. It might be Elizabeth Warren.
imagine2015
May 2016
#53
I love how there's supposedly no enthusiasm for the candidate who has received more votes than all
Metric System
May 2016
#59
And who do you think is going to Republican donors for money? Clue. It isn't Sanders
imagine2015
May 2016
#97
You deny he's become a rock start of sorts?Where are the 10s/1000s for HRC?Acceptance vs.Enthusiasm
snowy owl
May 2016
#118
Independents, tea-party republicans, and progressive dems. He attracts them all. He's a rock star!
snowy owl
May 2016
#153
Hell yes, it is her turn because We the people have spoken making it her turn.
Thinkingabout
May 2016
#101
Nothing to do with turns/sexism. Sexism all you you got, you go with it. Better candidate=Sanders.
snowy owl
May 2016
#119
Besides being sexist, it's her turn because she EARNED MORE VOTES than BS did.
Lil Missy
May 2016
#126
She tends toward sensationalism. Little reason but big emotion. Idolatry and loyalty.
snowy owl
May 2016
#154
Clinton will have to support centrist dems and centrist republicans to win 2020. Huge problem for us
snowy owl
May 2016
#155
With 70% of voters to her left. I'd say there is room for an alternative approach. eom
Betty Karlson
May 2016
#156