Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
19. Correct. Romney won independents in 2012 by 5% points ....
Tue May 17, 2016, 01:31 PM
May 2016

But NOT the election.


In the final days of the 2012 presidential campaign, Mitt Romney's political director Rich Beeson was steadfast about his candidate's chances in key swing state Ohio.

"Whoever wins independent voters in Ohio, wins Ohio," Beeson said on "Fox News Sunday," two days before the election.

He was, of course, wrong. Romney won self-identified Independents in Ohio by a overwhelming 10 points, according to exit polls, but lost the state to President Barack Obama by 2 points.

A similar trend was seen across much of the country — Romney won among Independents by 5 points, 50-45, but lost to Obama, 51-48. The numbers illustrate why winning the Independent vote in pre-election polls isn't necessarily a telltale sign of victory, as many political strategists have suggested.
In fact, what the Independent vote is often more telling of is a lack of commitment among "leaners" to the party.

The best example of that is seen in a candidate to which Romney is often compared — John Kerry, who won the Independent vote by a single point in 2004, but lost the election by about the same margin as Romney did in 2012.

What this means is that the Independent vote is, for two reasons, an unreliable indicator of electoral success. In 2004, Kerry was a candidate who was never completely accepted by the Democratic base. Sound familiar? Except this time, Romney was never fully beloved by the Republican base.

Jim Williams, an analyst at Public Policy Polling, explained during the "unskewing" controversy that a voter's choice to identify as an Independent can change by the day. Republicans who were disenchanted with Romney might have been more apt to identify as Independent, as Democrats were in 2004 when they were dissatisfied with Kerry.

In 2012, a much more reliable indicator of success — and a better example of the "swing" vote — came from voters who identified as "moderate." In every critical battleground state, Obama won the moderate vote. In Iowa, he captured more than 60% of it. Overall, Obama beat Romney by 15 points among moderates.

http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-romney-independent-vote-polls-moderates-election-2012-11

Also, as Nate Silver points out, it's a bit too early for all of these polls. We're still on the Democratic side in a primary race. Additionally as Silver points out, there's just not enough 'credible' polling out there on many fronts to be making decisive statements this early. It's not even June yet.

That road goes two ways Cali.. Peacetrain May 2016 #1
That's simply absurd. She will be the nominee cali May 2016 #45
Manipulations in NV took care of a lot of folk who might have wanted to vote against Trump. oldandhappy May 2016 #2
Fact SheenaR May 2016 #3
She can win without the ones that throw chairs and send death threats. YouDig May 2016 #4
No kidding Bobbie Jo May 2016 #5
They'd never vote for Hillary anyway ... why bother trying to appeal to them? NurseJackie May 2016 #12
Bullshit, of course you want their votes. And you need them. ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #13
No, I certainly don't. Bobbie Jo May 2016 #21
So if they stay home & Clinton loses, it won't bother you if Trump wins, based on your principled ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #23
What does that even mean? Bobbie Jo May 2016 #26
What do you mean what does that mean? You said you don't want the votes of Bernie supporters ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #33
That's what I thought you said Bobbie Jo May 2016 #36
Did you skip reading comprehension in grade school? ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #37
No, I comprehend just fine. Bobbie Jo May 2016 #41
No, I think you know you lost. ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #42
Did you? She said she didn't want the votes of chair throwers or death threateners . . . brush May 2016 #46
Let's concede about the supposed "chair throwers" How many? libdem4life May 2016 #30
Exactly. I don't want them in the party. nt Cali_Democrat May 2016 #14
No real Bernie supporters threw chairs and sent death threats. Those are Clinton goons. ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #6
Interesting theory you have. YouDig May 2016 #7
Since the call from out of state nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #22
Obama won without independents or white males. JaneyVee May 2016 #8
Completely different time and people. Dawgs May 2016 #10
He... LenaBaby61 May 2016 #15
Simply not true. ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #16
Check 2012. JaneyVee May 2016 #17
Correct. Romney won independents in 2012 by 5% points .... LenaBaby61 May 2016 #19
Hillary won't do as well as Romney among either independents or white males ... ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #25
Well... LenaBaby61 May 2016 #35
Come on. You have to know better. Independents are not a monolithic voting block brush May 2016 #48
He was an incumbent in 2012, not running for the first time. Besides, it was a much closer election ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #20
She'll get the sensible Sanders supporters and independents who don't want Trump . . . brush May 2016 #47
That's a lie. ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #24
I voted for and gave money to POTUS Obama in 2008. PufPuf23 May 2016 #34
Donald Trump Can't Win jamese777 May 2016 #9
Well come aboard...What's the hold up? eom asuhornets May 2016 #11
Two words: BillZBubb May 2016 #29
Oh that's set in stone...n/t asuhornets May 2016 #49
If the thought of Trump becoming President Proud Liberal Dem May 2016 #18
That's the kind of thinking inside the box that IDs a Hillary supporter. BillZBubb May 2016 #32
They think the Bernie backers will all fall in line if Hillary is the nominee. BillZBubb May 2016 #27
Not even with Republican money. libdem4life May 2016 #28
Bernie will get a convention speech and platform concessions. PeteSelman May 2016 #31
She doesnt need him, but she needs his supporters MadBadger May 2016 #38
Then perhaps it's time to stop terrorizing caucus convention and party chairs Tarc May 2016 #39
Cali, I have seen a ton of poo flying on both sides... JCMach1 May 2016 #40
Yes! To hell with ideology and policy! Maedhros May 2016 #44
Once again proving my point... JCMach1 May 2016 #52
I think they don't care. They are going for the Republican voters. B Calm May 2016 #43
She will get a majority of his supporters even with all of her supporters shenanigans. JRLeft May 2016 #50
BSSers Demsrule86 May 2016 #51
Absolutely correct. Here are some numbers for those math-loving Clinton supporters. Jim Lane May 2016 #53
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton cannot wi...»Reply #19