Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

(62,270 posts)

15. They called to order at 9:00am.

Thu May 19, 2016, 11:12 AM

May 2016

There is nothing in the rules about what time the preliminary rule to permanent change is supposed to happen.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Politifact needs to review its methods. It is using circular logic here. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #1

I think politifact sums it up pretty well. bloom May 2016 #2

But the circular logic is very clear. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #3

Excellent point casperthegm May 2016 #5

Plus the first count is the one that took place before the 9:30 vote. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #7

^^^^ THIS Politicalsanity May 2016 #13

Yeah, with a crowd split almost 50/50 as they claim(which I would argue) bobbobbins01 May 2016 #9

Maybe she would have had the entire chair not been accosted. joshcryer May 2016 #11

except that the rule change vote was pushed through Politicalsanity May 2016 #14

They called to order at 9:00am. joshcryer May 2016 #15

There is seemingly no end to your rationalization for dishonesty. nt Bonobo May 2016 #16

What dishonesty? joshcryer May 2016 #17

Because if there's no 2/3rds majority you can't change the rules. joshcryer May 2016 #12

Everybody knows its false workinclasszero May 2016 #6

It was the end of the Sanders campaign for sure. frylock May 2016 #18

I want to see Snopes' take. joshcryer May 2016 #10