Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:20 AM Jun 2016

the lesser of two evils [View all]

I understand disappointment and anger about not having your team win
I understand thinking that the other side/supporters are idiots

been there, done that.

But I don't understand not voting for the lesser of two evils.
While your non-vote is not a vote for the GOP, it strengthens the GOP because your vote has reliably been there to cancel out a vote for the GOP. So in effect, your non-vote does strengthen the GOP position.

You may not understand this, but many of us who prefer Clinton would vote for Sanders if he won the nomination.
And when we would cast that vote, we would be voting for the lesser of two evils in our minds.
Maybe we dislike Bernie a little less than you dislike Hillary, but we would still be compromising with ourselves to support your candidate.

And you would want us to vote for the lesser of two evils because you would want your nominee to win
and you would be angry if we withheld our vote because our team didn't win

but we care enough about our neighbors and family and friends, that we will do what is better for others...while we suffer our own disappointment




24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
the lesser of two evils [View all] Fresh_Start Jun 2016 OP
I completely agree nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #1
Interesting point. I love listening to people hearing different directions we arrive at places in seabeyond Jun 2016 #2
the lesser of two evils is really overused. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #3
understood Fresh_Start Jun 2016 #4
I hear ya, and wasn't necessarily commenting about you geek tragedy Jun 2016 #5
Agreed. The "lesser evil" thing is hyperbolic. Garrett78 Jun 2016 #23
In November, I am not voting for the Lesser of Evils, I am voting for the best available candidate. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #6
thats a better way to look at it Fresh_Start Jun 2016 #7
Ok I'll answer this pinebox Jun 2016 #8
I understand what you are saying Fresh_Start Jun 2016 #12
I worry about wars. Shemp Howard Jun 2016 #9
I'm very worried about Clinton scandals Fresh_Start Jun 2016 #10
The "lesser of two evils" meme is a lever used by the Democratic Establishment Maedhros Jun 2016 #11
I think you are misunderstanding the lever. Fresh_Start Jun 2016 #13
Oh, I've no doubt that they are using it to keep a coalition together. Maedhros Jun 2016 #14
I'm curious where you think the coalition is ahead of the platform? Fresh_Start Jun 2016 #15
The Party platform has consistently comprised empty platitudes for the last few decades. Maedhros Jun 2016 #17
Again, where is the coalition (the party membership) ahead of the party platform Fresh_Start Jun 2016 #19
You are absolutely correct: the rank-and-file expects NOTHING from their elected representatives, Maedhros Jun 2016 #21
Bullshit. It is used by the Naders and Sanders. Lol. seabeyond Jun 2016 #18
If you don't understand it, then you don't want to. But try to understand it this way: ancianita Jun 2016 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife Jun 2016 #20
Personally Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2016 #22
No, the better of two options. MineralMan Jun 2016 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»the lesser of two evils»Reply #0