Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Nina Turner bitterly slams Elizabeth Warren. [View all]Beowulf
(761 posts)56. Policy-wise I'm an enthusiastic supporter
Politically, she's been very timid this primary season. Given the circumstances, staying neutral during the primary was just as helpful to Hillary as her endorsement would have been. I think Turner is stating the obvious and the vitriol from Clinton supporters towards her is just one more example of the seething hatred they have for anyone who dared to challenge the self annoyed one.
And Turner is not saying Warren should be attacking Hillary. Get real.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
273 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
She's very bitter and resentful, isn't she? Feel the unity, Nina ... #FeelTheUnity.
NurseJackie
Jun 2016
#1
Maybe so but she was accurately telling it like it is. Not like someone worried about repercussion.
floriduck
Jun 2016
#67
She's setting the stage for future election cycles when more and more progressive candidates
floriduck
Jun 2016
#84
Oh, the pie in the Sky people versus the DINO - saurs. Whatever works to support ignorance.
floriduck
Jun 2016
#158
She's not "telling it like it is". She says Bernie was ENTITLED to Warren's endorsement, which is bs
CrowCityDem
Jun 2016
#80
That's a very narrow view of her intentions. She's sending a message to future super delegates if
floriduck
Jun 2016
#90
That waiting for the race to end isn't ok? Isn't that exactly what Bernie wanted? Get it straight.
CrowCityDem
Jun 2016
#91
She plays-well to the folks who already supported Bernie, but she added nothing to his campaign ...
NurseJackie
Jun 2016
#82
Really? The minute I heard her speek…. I was relieved that she was smart, thoughtful and sincere.
midnight
Jun 2016
#228
Sanders supporters aren't like poor Claire McCaskill who couldn't explain
appalachiablue
Jun 2016
#256
An angry, unreasonable black woman. Really, keep going. I want to see how low this gets.
appalachiablue
Jun 2016
#220
I told you to lose the game flipping. Get help if you can't stop. Later.
appalachiablue
Jun 2016
#235
Exactly. She needs to see that sowing further division doesn't help anyone.....
Sheepshank
Jun 2016
#172
Lock the rabbits up! She's really pissed off because she's berned all of her bridges and her
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2016
#73
It will be interesting to see what she DOES do when Bernie endorses Hillary, if
OnDoutside
Jun 2016
#159
Nina Turner was a Clinton supporter who switched to Bernie. She knows politics,
appalachiablue
Jun 2016
#219
What's her role in the campaign? What are her motivations & goals? What does she hope to accomplish?
NurseJackie
Jun 2016
#99
Are you trying to change the subject by making veiled accusations that I've said something "sexist"?
NurseJackie
Jun 2016
#113
Real anger, aggression, loss of control and shouting are at this awful outburst display.
appalachiablue
Jun 2016
#250
What you don't get I'll enumerate. It has everything to do with this thread
appalachiablue
Jun 2016
#267
If you don't understand the importance and relevance of how women leaders
appalachiablue
Jun 2016
#270
Also highly aggressive, vehement and bellicose. Angry and aggressive, another.
appalachiablue
Jun 2016
#222
So instead of attacking Trump, she wants Warren to attack Hillary. Does she even care about winning
YouDig
Jun 2016
#4
I'm thinking something more like this would be more efficient for the amount of people needing ....
boston bean
Jun 2016
#31
I disagree with her too, but personal attacks are petty. Also, if she wanted a meal ticket...
yurbud
Jun 2016
#87
Corp. Dem. Sen. Mark Warner of VA seven years, considered for VP twice already. Wow.
appalachiablue
Jun 2016
#225
That's the problem with Idealogues, anyone who is less than idealogically pure is a traitor.
OnDoutside
Jun 2016
#55
So, it's ok to be sexist and disgusting to a woman if they don't fit your mold?
glowing
Jun 2016
#138
You are the only one mentioning her color. Trying to twist it into a racial issue.
Lil Missy
Jun 2016
#209
Possibly so in this election cycle. But there will be many more like her in the cycles to come. So
floriduck
Jun 2016
#30
Possibly so in this election cycle. But there will be many more like her in the cycles to come. So
floriduck
Jun 2016
#38
it isn't Bernie's job to rein anyone in, he's doing the right thing now nt
geek tragedy
Jun 2016
#37
That is just not so. He has an absolute responsibility to rein in his campaign staff.
boston bean
Jun 2016
#44
THAT'S exactly what it is: passive aggressive! I couldn't put my finger on it. Thanks!
AgadorSparticus
Jun 2016
#244
This is hysterical! Six months ago it was deemed that bitter was a sexist term not to be used...
peace13
Jun 2016
#197
No because Everybody Already Crossed the Bridge and Nina is on the Other Side and Can't Swim
Stallion
Jun 2016
#74
Anyone mad at someone who stayed neutral is bitter, petty, and thinking like Trump.
CrowCityDem
Jun 2016
#40
That's what I said yesterday. FFS, Trump is low-hanging fruit. Who wouldn't attack him?
valerief
Jun 2016
#43
"Nina Turner, bitterly." You could have just stopped there and still been accurate.
BobbyDrake
Jun 2016
#53
Turner's gratuitous trashing of Warren after that masterful speech tying Trump to the GOP
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2016
#85
There are a few Bernie supporters that are less than pleased with her as well
Blue_Adept
Jun 2016
#72
Obvious? She's saying Bernie was ENTITLED to Warren's endorsement. That's pure bs.
CrowCityDem
Jun 2016
#88
The only way you can be angry at neutrality is if you feel they were SUPPOSED to be with you.
CrowCityDem
Jun 2016
#129
Nina, Warren didn't endorse any Democratic candidate for the nomination. No one
still_one
Jun 2016
#63
I suspect she was torn between Hillary's tenacity and Bernie's stance on some issues...
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2016
#78
Warren was/is being strategic, just as Bernie was when he ran as a Dem instead of independent
yurbud
Jun 2016
#83
Did ANYONE in Congress campaign for Sanders? He had one -count it, ONE- Senate endorsement.
randome
Jun 2016
#92
Right. Senate "Democrats" roll their eyes at him because he refuses to deal with lobbyists
Ned_Devine
Jun 2016
#185
Meh. Telling someone else who they HAVE to endorse/campaign for. Not cool.
yellowcanine
Jun 2016
#102
tina "truth teller" must never have researched bernie sanders history...probably wouldn't
beachbum bob
Jun 2016
#126
I don't get Turner at all. I don't care that she switched from Clinton to Sanders
onenote
Jun 2016
#130
The slam was implying Warren was being weak by not endorsing Bernie, as though she owed it to him.
CrowCityDem
Jun 2016
#153
Nina Turner is still mad Bill Clinton didn't mention her at an Ohio state dinner...Very bitter lady.
timlot
Jun 2016
#184
Priceless innit. Wonder if Angela Merkel, Indira Gandhi or Maggie Thatcher
appalachiablue
Jun 2016
#272
She sure waited long enough to endorse. Although, I hear she agrees with a lot of HRC's foreign
Hiraeth
Jun 2016
#239
Maybe Senator Warren just didn't think that Bernie had earned her endorsement.
StevieM
Jun 2016
#221
Warren understands that a united front behind the presumptive nominee is more important than a temp
TwilightZone
Jun 2016
#255