Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I was here in 2008. I supported Obama. But I don't recall being told that there could be [View all]DesertRat
(27,995 posts)58. Thank you for posting this
Believing or spreading certain right-wing smears about Senator Obama or Michelle Obama could earn you an immediate tombstone. Ignorance is not an excuse -- everyone on Democratic Underground should know better on this stuff. Some examples: The suggestion that Senator Obama is a Muslim; xeonophobic use of his middle name; spreading rumors about secret videotapes with racist rants. If you're acting like a Freeper or a "concern troll," we'll assume that you are one.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
181 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I was here in 2008. I supported Obama. But I don't recall being told that there could be [View all]
jillan
Jun 2016
OP
I really resent people telling me, a 60 year old woman who has voted dem in every election
jillan
Jun 2016
#8
I resent that there was all this excitement about there being the 1st black president but none about
kerry-is-my-prez
Jun 2016
#110
There are lots of young women (and old women) and young girls for whom this is an important
MADem
Jun 2016
#113
Well, he wouldn't have been--the first Jew, that is--to compete for the office, at any rate.
MADem
Jun 2016
#152
Very disappointing , but very predictable...considering the demographic profile of the "unexcited".
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2016
#145
Oh, you have said plenty over the past year. Do you think our memories are that short? nt
Live and Learn
Jun 2016
#41
You've done much worse than that. And I do consider supporting Hillary pretty bad. nt
Live and Learn
Jun 2016
#47
Never said she wasn't. Presumptive being the key word. You do know what it means? nt
Live and Learn
Jun 2016
#138
Yes--and it means what it meant when we ascribed it to POTUS Obama, and John Kerry and Al Gore and
MADem
Jun 2016
#148
I really don't have anytime to spare for you. Especially in light of the fact that I won't even be
Live and Learn
Jun 2016
#94
Maybe you just can't see it when you do it. You certainly blame others for it when they aren't
Live and Learn
Jun 2016
#119
You can tell me all you want, but I just don't do it, and that 'simple search' could have been done
MADem
Jun 2016
#126
No, no difference. And I'm not a teacher--obviously you confuse me with someone else.
MADem
Jun 2016
#149
Maybe it is just coming down to the wire and people are processing not just the loss
AgadorSparticus
Jun 2016
#111
no it goes this way if you don't vote for Hillary then you're not a Democrat or a liberal
azurnoir
Jun 2016
#25
One person used the term corporate whore - the physician who helped write the ACA & he
jillan
Jun 2016
#46
I recall many here calling Mitt a corporate whore and yet no complaints.
Live and Learn
Jun 2016
#72
LOl. Never thought I'd see the day. Sanders and his supporters are not Democrat enough
notadmblnd
Jun 2016
#18
I may be bitter and angry. I can admit that and I can state many reasons why
notadmblnd
Jun 2016
#32
Because those who love the status quo know that Bernie started something that isn't over yet:
Betty Karlson
Jun 2016
#45
I don't know where or why you accuse me of that. I'm happy this nightmare is ending.
MADem
Jun 2016
#50
Same here. I was a Clinton supporter. It stung to lose, but after a break, I got back with it.
Lyric
Jun 2016
#157
Anything suggesting that he should lose or in favor of an alternative movement was quashed.
Zynx
Jun 2016
#7
Thanks for this. There goes another conspiracy theory of things being different back then.
grossproffit
Jun 2016
#13
Thanks for this - but it is different. We were allowed to criticize Obama back then -
jillan
Jun 2016
#31
I suggest you seek clarification in ATA. I think the guidelines are essentially the same.
MADem
Jun 2016
#52
The attacks against her have, on average, been far worse than what was said about Lieberman.
Zynx
Jun 2016
#16
Obama never had anything to criticize, policy-wise, going into the nomination
KeepItReal
Jun 2016
#56
Well, I've certainly been banned (unjustly, I believe) from the Obama room.
PatrickforO
Jun 2016
#96
Not really. There was no rule against being critical of his policies. Being critical of stated
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2016
#161
You sure do like to throw your little rule hammers around. It's my understanding that Clinton
w4rma
Jun 2016
#156
I don't think adhering to a system you agreed to when you joined is "throwing little rule hammers ar
LanternWaste
Jun 2016
#179
I was here. I remember Skinner's carefully worded missive that constructive criticism
LanternWaste
Jun 2016
#175