Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I was here in 2008. I supported Obama. But I don't recall being told that there could be [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)113. There are lots of young women (and old women) and young girls for whom this is an important
and very symbolic occasion.
It really IS a big deal. If HRC picks Warren as VP, it will be an even bigger deal.
Won't it be something to see a CABINET that LOOKS LIKE America? Half the people around that table being female?
Her nomination, and her Presidency, are game changers. I hope the media stops carping and crabbing, and starts to appreciate this fact.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
181 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I was here in 2008. I supported Obama. But I don't recall being told that there could be [View all]
jillan
Jun 2016
OP
I really resent people telling me, a 60 year old woman who has voted dem in every election
jillan
Jun 2016
#8
I resent that there was all this excitement about there being the 1st black president but none about
kerry-is-my-prez
Jun 2016
#110
There are lots of young women (and old women) and young girls for whom this is an important
MADem
Jun 2016
#113
Well, he wouldn't have been--the first Jew, that is--to compete for the office, at any rate.
MADem
Jun 2016
#152
Very disappointing , but very predictable...considering the demographic profile of the "unexcited".
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2016
#145
Oh, you have said plenty over the past year. Do you think our memories are that short? nt
Live and Learn
Jun 2016
#41
You've done much worse than that. And I do consider supporting Hillary pretty bad. nt
Live and Learn
Jun 2016
#47
Never said she wasn't. Presumptive being the key word. You do know what it means? nt
Live and Learn
Jun 2016
#138
Yes--and it means what it meant when we ascribed it to POTUS Obama, and John Kerry and Al Gore and
MADem
Jun 2016
#148
I really don't have anytime to spare for you. Especially in light of the fact that I won't even be
Live and Learn
Jun 2016
#94
Maybe you just can't see it when you do it. You certainly blame others for it when they aren't
Live and Learn
Jun 2016
#119
You can tell me all you want, but I just don't do it, and that 'simple search' could have been done
MADem
Jun 2016
#126
No, no difference. And I'm not a teacher--obviously you confuse me with someone else.
MADem
Jun 2016
#149
Maybe it is just coming down to the wire and people are processing not just the loss
AgadorSparticus
Jun 2016
#111
no it goes this way if you don't vote for Hillary then you're not a Democrat or a liberal
azurnoir
Jun 2016
#25
One person used the term corporate whore - the physician who helped write the ACA & he
jillan
Jun 2016
#46
I recall many here calling Mitt a corporate whore and yet no complaints.
Live and Learn
Jun 2016
#72
LOl. Never thought I'd see the day. Sanders and his supporters are not Democrat enough
notadmblnd
Jun 2016
#18
I may be bitter and angry. I can admit that and I can state many reasons why
notadmblnd
Jun 2016
#32
Because those who love the status quo know that Bernie started something that isn't over yet:
Betty Karlson
Jun 2016
#45
I don't know where or why you accuse me of that. I'm happy this nightmare is ending.
MADem
Jun 2016
#50
Same here. I was a Clinton supporter. It stung to lose, but after a break, I got back with it.
Lyric
Jun 2016
#157
Anything suggesting that he should lose or in favor of an alternative movement was quashed.
Zynx
Jun 2016
#7
Thanks for this. There goes another conspiracy theory of things being different back then.
grossproffit
Jun 2016
#13
Thanks for this - but it is different. We were allowed to criticize Obama back then -
jillan
Jun 2016
#31
I suggest you seek clarification in ATA. I think the guidelines are essentially the same.
MADem
Jun 2016
#52
The attacks against her have, on average, been far worse than what was said about Lieberman.
Zynx
Jun 2016
#16
Obama never had anything to criticize, policy-wise, going into the nomination
KeepItReal
Jun 2016
#56
Well, I've certainly been banned (unjustly, I believe) from the Obama room.
PatrickforO
Jun 2016
#96
Not really. There was no rule against being critical of his policies. Being critical of stated
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2016
#161
You sure do like to throw your little rule hammers around. It's my understanding that Clinton
w4rma
Jun 2016
#156
I don't think adhering to a system you agreed to when you joined is "throwing little rule hammers ar
LanternWaste
Jun 2016
#179
I was here. I remember Skinner's carefully worded missive that constructive criticism
LanternWaste
Jun 2016
#175