Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Bernie just told Wolf Blitzer that he is an Independent and will be an Independent for the remainder [View all]MaggieD
(7,393 posts)77. Not how I see it
He called for a primary on Obama; he has spent an years trying to convince young people that Dems are corrupt (with absolutely NOTHING to back that up); his campaign lied about endorsements, stole data from other campaigns, faked being union members to invade union workspace; said black people's votes don't matter; used the party and its infrastructure even though he is not a member of it (dishonest and unethical), and told people the system was rigged because he couldn't admit he lost in state after state.
And he did all this without having any real progressive accomplishments of his own to tout. None.
He is nothing more than a Nader IMO.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
163 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Bernie just told Wolf Blitzer that he is an Independent and will be an Independent for the remainder [View all]
politicaljunkie41910
Jul 2016
OP
Yeah, good for him that he used the Democratic Party whenit suited him and now that he
lunamagica
Jul 2016
#8
What a really fucked-up talking point that is, and very depressing that it's become so popular on DU
yodermon
Jul 2016
#66
not to mention getting Hillary Pac money in 2006. I think we know who benefits most between
DLCWIdem
Jul 2016
#133
meh, he ran for the Senate as an I so might as well leave it as an I on his Senate door nt
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#3
How silly. They will vote for the candidate they like better, it just won't be Sanders.
SharonClark
Jul 2016
#154
Yes. They'll support a Republican declaring themselves as a Democrat. And they'll lose. (nt)
w4rma
Jul 2016
#155
It's not about revenge....it's about a pragmatic choice of who will support
msanthrope
Jul 2016
#158
Perhaps; but that is speculation. The document is the official position, filed 6 months after
LongtimeAZDem
Jul 2016
#120
Well I'll be damned. Is he thinking straight? He basically admitted he used the party . . .
brush
Jul 2016
#6
What's wrong with having political opinions? One has to be a member of a party to speak their mind?
arcane1
Jul 2016
#10
Since when are progressive ideals defined by agreement with Bernie Sanders? -nt-
Lord Magus
Jul 2016
#35
People support policies and platforms more than personalities (well, at least they should,
silvershadow
Jul 2016
#13
Party politics only matter to die-hard partisans. Apparently that lesson was lost to history?
silvershadow
Jul 2016
#44
I assume the people objecting to his staying Independant as a Senator would have preferred that he
Dustlawyer
Jul 2016
#20
I think you guys are making it tougher for those Democrats who are against voting
Cal33
Jul 2016
#46
ha ha haaa. He's been indy his whole life. He did us a FAVOR by not running as an Indy
yodermon
Jul 2016
#73
Tha's a load of crap similar to the bashing of the Clintons over the Foundation stuff, it's bashing
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2016
#106
Ew. I feel so used, Bernie. You said we had a real relationship--turns out you were just canoodling
Hekate
Jul 2016
#48
The problem is he claimed to be a Democrat for the last year while running for the Dem nomination.
Lord Magus
Jul 2016
#92
Today's show is now on the CNN website if you want to check it out.
politicaljunkie41910
Jul 2016
#90
I can't see how he would expect a role at the convention at this point. Nor any further serious
LuvLoogie
Jul 2016
#98
He was never a Democrat, all he wanted was the resources of the Democratic Party
liberal N proud
Jul 2016
#103
As I say, fascinating. We all knew this as we got in trouble saying it out loud. Scolded even, Nt
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#109
Okay, so is he lying now, or when he claimed the same thing about being a Dem?
synergie
Jul 2016
#112
Sanders has never in his life been a Democrat, and a lot of use were suspended
The Second Stone
Jul 2016
#117
Sure he did; he could have meant it, instead of claiming it for political expedience
LongtimeAZDem
Jul 2016
#130
He can be whatever he sees fit. But then why the obsession of changing the platform
robbedvoter
Jul 2016
#147
Also, on March 5th, Tad Devine declared on MSNBC that he is not running for
robbedvoter
Jul 2016
#152