Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No, nothing was done OKNancy Jul 2016 #1
Their lawyers? rjsquirrel Jul 2016 #6
Ah Wikileaks don't want to be investigated/criticized! Threatening the media! LOL! Her Sister Jul 2016 #10
They're showing their true colors by threatening Joy like that. sarae Jul 2016 #36
Donald, is that you? EffieBlack Jul 2016 #44
No. But something was done with that leaked Clinton donor list that folks seem to have forgotten. nt glennward Jul 2016 #50
Joy Reid?? wikileaks?? I don't think so - asiliveandbreathe Jul 2016 #54
I copied that tweet straight from the wikileaks page OKNancy Jul 2016 #55
"Our lawyers"??? PatSeg Jul 2016 #58
This message was self-deleted by its author Press Virginia Jul 2016 #2
I responded to a friend on another board about Ilsa Jul 2016 #3
To reply honestly would be breaking the new rules. B Calm Jul 2016 #4
Be objective. Was anything DONE to undercut Bernie or not? Evidence please, not emotion. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #7
Fish not biting today. B Calm Jul 2016 #8
all these barracudas and sharks? reddread Jul 2016 #11
Adults are able to have civil, objective, evidence-based conversations. You might think about that. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #14
It's funny. You ask people to state a charge and provide LuvLoogie Jul 2016 #53
I see one post already removed. B Calm Jul 2016 #59
You might think about TOS. The actual truth cannot be discussed here, period. So we'll have JudyM Jul 2016 #63
Unlike the JPR site, right? Andy823 Jul 2016 #67
I am in fact not a member of JPR, so you might want to check your assumptions. JudyM Jul 2016 #68
Fisherman nonetheless convinced that the bait should be appealing. JudyM Jul 2016 #64
AP announcement on the eve of Ca primary reddread Jul 2016 #9
So now you are saying AP was involved? Even before California, the math wasn't there for Bernie still_one Jul 2016 #13
"was anything done to undercut Bernie?" reddread Jul 2016 #16
The AP announcement did not deter people from voting. still_one Jul 2016 #18
Of course it did. Scuba Jul 2016 #31
not in the New History it didnt reddread Jul 2016 #35
really, so Californians decided not to vote on the propositions and other offices because still_one Jul 2016 #39
do you believe in vote suppression? reddread Jul 2016 #42
Do you live in California? There were propositions and other offices on that ballot still_one Jul 2016 #38
In 2008 more than 5 million voted in the California Democratic primary. In 2016, < 3.5 million. Scuba Jul 2016 #45
not so. Your figures are NOT the final count still_one Jul 2016 #48
Yes, things were done that violated the impartiality rule ... Scuba Jul 2016 #5
#1 is the only violation I see. randome Jul 2016 #15
I agree. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #27
#1 is troubling, but doubtful any significant impact on the process. We also must remember CONTEXT. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #22
This just may be the funniest and most one-sided OP I've seen here in a while. merrily Jul 2016 #12
Then I guess you didn't bother to read the entire OP. If you have evidence that anything RBInMaine Jul 2016 #17
Why would I reply substantively to a post that implies I am not capable of adult conversation? merrily Jul 2016 #32
well, your guy this morning is wholeheartedly on the unity train OKNancy Jul 2016 #21
What does that have to do with what I posted? merrily Jul 2016 #23
And Bernie Sanders has just again said he strongly supports Hillary and will be going after Trump. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #29
What does that have to do with my comment about your OP post? merrily Jul 2016 #30
You imply that Bernie's campaign had to have been seriously undermined. I say not, and Bernie is RBInMaine Jul 2016 #33
Please see Reply 32. Thanks. merrily Jul 2016 #34
Then show me you ARE capable. Please, leave the thin skin to Donald Trump. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #37
Evidently, so does his former campaign chairman, Jeff Weaver. calimary Jul 2016 #52
No, nothing was done. Also, they were during the time when Bernie's camp was accusing them of crimes CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #19
As a former local politician Madam Mossfern Jul 2016 #43
Two questions: CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #47
If you're a DNC member you're a 'public servant' to the Party Madam Mossfern Jul 2016 #60
So you will believe what you want to, with no evidence to back it up. CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #61
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #20
Exactly, it's not worth a hide! B Calm Jul 2016 #24
Childish attacks and no substance at all. Typical. I feel sorry for you. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #26
Are you entirely incapable of a fair and adult conversation just because it might contradict RBInMaine Jul 2016 #25
Carry on! nt Logical Jul 2016 #28
It's just another death rattle from some diehard supporters giftedgirl77 Jul 2016 #40
curves ahead reddread Jul 2016 #46
Lol giftedgirl77 Jul 2016 #57
Only just enough stupid to spin it into a vast left wing conspiracy...over reaction run amok. L. Coyote Jul 2016 #41
Massive K & R. Thanks for posting. Surya Gayatri Jul 2016 #49
I'd like to respond, but the new rules forbid it Android3.14 Jul 2016 #51
It doesn't matter. Vinca Jul 2016 #56
Magic 8 Ball Says? NorthCarolina Jul 2016 #62
Exactly! People are allowed personal bias. It is called human nature. AgadorSparticus Jul 2016 #65
Had all the stuff the DNC been accused of doing to Sanders been done, The Second Stone Jul 2016 #66
Jesus Christ, I feel like democracy should matter to you, as if that component has JCanete Jul 2016 #70
You don't need to support any behavior and you don't need to avoid Trump The Second Stone Jul 2016 #71
Nothing whatsoever treestar Jul 2016 #69
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Stupid things SAID in lea...»Reply #28