Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Stupid things SAID in leaked emails, but was anything actually DONE to undercut Sanders? [View all]Logical
(22,457 posts)28. Carry on! nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Stupid things SAID in leaked emails, but was anything actually DONE to undercut Sanders? [View all]
RBInMaine
Jul 2016
OP
Ah Wikileaks don't want to be investigated/criticized! Threatening the media! LOL!
Her Sister
Jul 2016
#10
No. But something was done with that leaked Clinton donor list that folks seem to have forgotten. nt
glennward
Jul 2016
#50
Be objective. Was anything DONE to undercut Bernie or not? Evidence please, not emotion.
RBInMaine
Jul 2016
#7
Adults are able to have civil, objective, evidence-based conversations. You might think about that.
RBInMaine
Jul 2016
#14
You might think about TOS. The actual truth cannot be discussed here, period. So we'll have
JudyM
Jul 2016
#63
So now you are saying AP was involved? Even before California, the math wasn't there for Bernie
still_one
Jul 2016
#13
really, so Californians decided not to vote on the propositions and other offices because
still_one
Jul 2016
#39
Do you live in California? There were propositions and other offices on that ballot
still_one
Jul 2016
#38
In 2008 more than 5 million voted in the California Democratic primary. In 2016, < 3.5 million.
Scuba
Jul 2016
#45
#1 is troubling, but doubtful any significant impact on the process. We also must remember CONTEXT.
RBInMaine
Jul 2016
#22
Then I guess you didn't bother to read the entire OP. If you have evidence that anything
RBInMaine
Jul 2016
#17
Why would I reply substantively to a post that implies I am not capable of adult conversation?
merrily
Jul 2016
#32
And Bernie Sanders has just again said he strongly supports Hillary and will be going after Trump.
RBInMaine
Jul 2016
#29
You imply that Bernie's campaign had to have been seriously undermined. I say not, and Bernie is
RBInMaine
Jul 2016
#33
No, nothing was done. Also, they were during the time when Bernie's camp was accusing them of crimes
CrowCityDem
Jul 2016
#19
Are you entirely incapable of a fair and adult conversation just because it might contradict
RBInMaine
Jul 2016
#25
Only just enough stupid to spin it into a vast left wing conspiracy...over reaction run amok.
L. Coyote
Jul 2016
#41
Jesus Christ, I feel like democracy should matter to you, as if that component has
JCanete
Jul 2016
#70
You don't need to support any behavior and you don't need to avoid Trump
The Second Stone
Jul 2016
#71