2016 Postmortem

Scuba

(53,475 posts)

31. Of course it did.

Reply to still_one (Reply #18)

Sun Jul 24, 2016, 09:44 AM

Jul 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

71 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Stupid things SAID in leaked emails, but was anything actually DONE to undercut Sanders? [View all] RBInMaine Jul 2016 OP

No, nothing was done OKNancy Jul 2016 #1

Their lawyers? rjsquirrel Jul 2016 #6

Ah Wikileaks don't want to be investigated/criticized! Threatening the media! LOL! Her Sister Jul 2016 #10

They're showing their true colors by threatening Joy like that. sarae Jul 2016 #36

Donald, is that you? EffieBlack Jul 2016 #44

No. But something was done with that leaked Clinton donor list that folks seem to have forgotten. nt glennward Jul 2016 #50

Joy Reid?? wikileaks?? I don't think so - asiliveandbreathe Jul 2016 #54

I copied that tweet straight from the wikileaks page OKNancy Jul 2016 #55

"Our lawyers"??? PatSeg Jul 2016 #58

This message was self-deleted by its author Press Virginia Jul 2016 #2

I responded to a friend on another board about Ilsa Jul 2016 #3

To reply honestly would be breaking the new rules. B Calm Jul 2016 #4

Be objective. Was anything DONE to undercut Bernie or not? Evidence please, not emotion. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #7

Fish not biting today. B Calm Jul 2016 #8

all these barracudas and sharks? reddread Jul 2016 #11

Adults are able to have civil, objective, evidence-based conversations. You might think about that. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #14

It's funny. You ask people to state a charge and provide LuvLoogie Jul 2016 #53

I see one post already removed. B Calm Jul 2016 #59

You might think about TOS. The actual truth cannot be discussed here, period. So we'll have JudyM Jul 2016 #63

Unlike the JPR site, right? Andy823 Jul 2016 #67

I am in fact not a member of JPR, so you might want to check your assumptions. JudyM Jul 2016 #68

Fisherman nonetheless convinced that the bait should be appealing. JudyM Jul 2016 #64

AP announcement on the eve of Ca primary reddread Jul 2016 #9

So now you are saying AP was involved? Even before California, the math wasn't there for Bernie still_one Jul 2016 #13

"was anything done to undercut Bernie?" reddread Jul 2016 #16

The AP announcement did not deter people from voting. still_one Jul 2016 #18

Of course it did. Scuba Jul 2016 #31

not in the New History it didnt reddread Jul 2016 #35

really, so Californians decided not to vote on the propositions and other offices because still_one Jul 2016 #39

do you believe in vote suppression? reddread Jul 2016 #42

Do you live in California? There were propositions and other offices on that ballot still_one Jul 2016 #38

In 2008 more than 5 million voted in the California Democratic primary. In 2016, < 3.5 million. Scuba Jul 2016 #45

not so. Your figures are NOT the final count still_one Jul 2016 #48

Yes, things were done that violated the impartiality rule ... Scuba Jul 2016 #5

#1 is the only violation I see. randome Jul 2016 #15

I agree. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #27

#1 is troubling, but doubtful any significant impact on the process. We also must remember CONTEXT. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #22

This just may be the funniest and most one-sided OP I've seen here in a while. merrily Jul 2016 #12

Then I guess you didn't bother to read the entire OP. If you have evidence that anything RBInMaine Jul 2016 #17

Why would I reply substantively to a post that implies I am not capable of adult conversation? merrily Jul 2016 #32

well, your guy this morning is wholeheartedly on the unity train OKNancy Jul 2016 #21

What does that have to do with what I posted? merrily Jul 2016 #23

And Bernie Sanders has just again said he strongly supports Hillary and will be going after Trump. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #29

What does that have to do with my comment about your OP post? merrily Jul 2016 #30

You imply that Bernie's campaign had to have been seriously undermined. I say not, and Bernie is RBInMaine Jul 2016 #33

Please see Reply 32. Thanks. merrily Jul 2016 #34

Then show me you ARE capable. Please, leave the thin skin to Donald Trump. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #37

Evidently, so does his former campaign chairman, Jeff Weaver. calimary Jul 2016 #52

No, nothing was done. Also, they were during the time when Bernie's camp was accusing them of crimes CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #19

As a former local politician Madam Mossfern Jul 2016 #43

Two questions: CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #47

If you're a DNC member you're a 'public servant' to the Party Madam Mossfern Jul 2016 #60

So you will believe what you want to, with no evidence to back it up. CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #61

Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #20

Exactly, it's not worth a hide! B Calm Jul 2016 #24

Childish attacks and no substance at all. Typical. I feel sorry for you. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #26

Are you entirely incapable of a fair and adult conversation just because it might contradict RBInMaine Jul 2016 #25

Carry on! nt Logical Jul 2016 #28

It's just another death rattle from some diehard supporters giftedgirl77 Jul 2016 #40

curves ahead reddread Jul 2016 #46

Lol giftedgirl77 Jul 2016 #57

Only just enough stupid to spin it into a vast left wing conspiracy...over reaction run amok. L. Coyote Jul 2016 #41

Massive K & R. Thanks for posting. Surya Gayatri Jul 2016 #49

I'd like to respond, but the new rules forbid it Android3.14 Jul 2016 #51

It doesn't matter. Vinca Jul 2016 #56

Magic 8 Ball Says? NorthCarolina Jul 2016 #62

Exactly! People are allowed personal bias. It is called human nature. AgadorSparticus Jul 2016 #65

Had all the stuff the DNC been accused of doing to Sanders been done, The Second Stone Jul 2016 #66

Jesus Christ, I feel like democracy should matter to you, as if that component has JCanete Jul 2016 #70

You don't need to support any behavior and you don't need to avoid Trump The Second Stone Jul 2016 #71

Nothing whatsoever treestar Jul 2016 #69