Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)538: "Down-Ballot Democrats Should Go After Johnson And Stein Voters" [View all]
Down-Ballot Democrats Should Go After Johnson And Stein Voters:The third-party vote is unusually big this year bigger than in any presidential election since 1992. Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson and Green Party nominee Jill Stein regularly combine for more than 10 percent of the vote in national polls. But despite those relatively strong showings, we know little about the partisan makeup of Johnsons and Steins voters; there are enough of them to be worth tracking but too few to make up a meaningful sample in most individual surveys. Which party these voters favor outside of the presidential race could affect down-ballot races for the U.S. Senate and House.
We can learn a bit more about these voters from new data that Morning Consult has shared with FiveThirtyEight; its aggregated from the firms national tracking polls from Aug. 1 through Aug. 20. Johnsons voters are very slightly more favorably disposed toward Republicans. Steins voters are overwhelmingly more favorable toward Democrats. If these voters shun the two major parties at the top of the ticket but choose between the two in down-ballot races, they could help Democrats in congressional races.
When respondents were asked which partys candidate they would back in their districts U.S. House race, only 53 percent of Johnson backers said the Republican; 46 percent said they would vote for the Democrat. (They were not offered the option of a third-party candidate.)1 Thats a bit surprising I would guess that a Libertarian candidate would draw support disproportionately from the GOP. But the small Republican edge among Johnson supporters means that, as a group, they would barely affect down-ballot races if they voted for a major-party nominee. Considering that 9 percent of all voters in the Morning Consult data said they were supporting Johnson for president, the 7-point edge in the U.S. House question means that Johnson voters are adding a little less than two-thirds of a percentage point of support to the Republican margin in the national House vote.
Stein supporters, meanwhile, overwhelmingly favor Democratic House candidates (not surprisingly). Democrats win the House ballot among Stein voters 74 percent to 25 percent. That nearly 50-point margin means that although just 4 percent of all voters are backing Stein, they add 2 percentage points to the aggregate Democratic margin in House races.
Great article. Well worth reading (and well worth executing the suggested strategy).
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
55 replies, 9734 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
538: "Down-Ballot Democrats Should Go After Johnson And Stein Voters" [View all]
Attorney in Texas
Aug 2016
OP
"we know little about the partisan makeup of Johnson’s and Stein’s voters..."
R. Daneel Olivaw
Aug 2016
#1
The Dems do have a better strategy but it sounds like you haven't been listening?
bettyellen
Aug 2016
#8
You think DUers are formulating or executing the campaign strategy? Lol nope.
bettyellen
Aug 2016
#10
I don't recall writing anything of the sort, and frankly I'm glad that they aren't...hopefully.
R. Daneel Olivaw
Aug 2016
#11
With all your complaints about insults it does sound very personal to you....
bettyellen
Aug 2016
#14
I know it must be hard, but try re-re-reading the OP and what it says.
R. Daneel Olivaw
Aug 2016
#15
Sure they can, but don't call yourself progressive if you plan to vote for any third party candidate
Demsrule86
Aug 2016
#34
I believe the vast majority of those who consider themselves Green have already
still_one
Aug 2016
#51
It makes no sense for Democrats to try to appeal to libertarians -- who don't believe
pnwmom
Aug 2016
#16
since you have stated on this site that you would vote for n "down ticket but not the top"
Demsrule86
Aug 2016
#36