Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UCmeNdc

(9,600 posts)
4. I disagree with the original author's argument
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 04:08 PM
Nov 2012

Steve Kornacaki makes the argument that changing the Senate rules so that a Senator must actually speak during a filibuster will do little to curb filibustering. I disagree. I think making senators participate and speak during a filibuster will curb the appeal of a filibuster for Senators who want to filibuster over insignificant details. By actually having to speak during a filibuster will put a name and a face on those Senators who are actually holding up senate business and why they are doing it. If there is a constant silliness behind their motives the silly senators will soon find themselves out of the Senate.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The false hope of filibus...»Reply #4