Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Madam45for2923

(7,178 posts)
1. Here's a thread about #1p1vote and urgent calls to action to protect our democracy
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 10:48 AM
Dec 2016

?@AndreaChalupa
Here's a thread about #1p1vote and urgent calls to action to protect our democracy
RETWEETS



Andrea Chalupa ?@AndreaChalupa 8m8 minutes ago
1. Over 2.5 million more Americans and counting voted for @HillaryClinton. Yet 80K people are deciding the election?
1 reply 13 retweets 15 likes

Andrea Chalupa ?@AndreaChalupa 7m7 minutes ago
2. The Electoral College no longer works as our Founding Fathers intended it to. The EC was created to protect us from a populist demagogue


Andrea Chalupa ?@AndreaChalupa 7m7 minutes ago
3. To the world & most Americans who voted in this election, it appears America is not a democracy if 80K votes can cancel out 2.5 million

Andrea Chalupa ?@AndreaChalupa 7m7 minutes ago
4. Luckily, George W. Bush showed us a way to correct this. It's called Equal Protection & was used to elect Bush in 2004 via Gore v. Bush

Andrea Chalupa ?@AndreaChalupa 6m6 minutes ago
Andrea Chalupa Retweeted Lessig
5. Harvard Law Professor @lessig breaks down the argument for Equal Protection enforcing will of 2.5 million+ votersAndrea Chalupa added,
Lessig @lessig
Why Bush v. Gore might mean that Clinton should be president: The EP argument against winner-take-all: #1p1vote http://ow.ly/lh9l306NcnX

Andrea Chalupa ?@AndreaChalupa 6m6 minutes ago
6. There's a strong precedent of Equal Protection deciding a presidential election. The GOP had the backbone to use it. We must use it now.

Andrea Chalupa ?@AndreaChalupa 6m6 minutes ago
7. Call AGs of states whose citizens' voices were heard loud & clear in the popular vote. Tell them to enforce the Equal Protection clause
1 reply 4 retweets 4 likes

Andrea Chalupa ?@AndreaChalupa 5m5 minutes ago
8. Here are numbers to AGs of states we need to call today to demand they enforce the Equal Protection clause: https://goo.gl/NceH08

Andrea Chalupa ?@AndreaChalupa 5m5 minutes ago
9. Please RT! Do this Twitter storm 2day: demand AGs protect democracy/popular vote: enforce Equal Protection clause https://goo.gl/0LQxze

Andrea Chalupa ?@AndreaChalupa 5m5 minutes ago
10. We must fight on as many fronts as we can to stop a populist demagogue from turning our country into a kleptocracy. Rely on yourself now

Andrea Chalupa ?@AndreaChalupa 4m4 minutes ago
11. In addition to demanding #1p1vote, in these next two weeks continue to take actions for #AuditTheVote: http://purl.org/f4a/auditthevote
0 replies 5 retweets 4 likes

Here's a thread about #1p1vote and urgent calls to action to protect our democracy Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #1
The theory here being that the Constitution is unconstitutional FBaggins Dec 2016 #2
The right to equal justice under law supercedes the EC if a conflict arises. Coyotl Dec 2016 #10
If what you're saying is true, then Dems are condemned to lose POTUS forever. SpankMe Dec 2016 #18
Sorry... that's beyond far-fetched FBaggins Dec 2016 #21
because it conflicts with the tenth amendment gejohnston Dec 2016 #3
Here are numbers to AGs of states we need to call today to demand they enforce the Equal Protection Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #4
Winner take all for state electoral votes is NOT in US constitution. Enforce Equal Protection Clause Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #5
THIS..!!! pangaia Dec 2016 #6
Am in NY too! NY AG Eric Schneiderman 1-800-788-9898 Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #7
contact them ASAP.... pangaia Dec 2016 #8
Start making the phone calls. We need just one state AG to take to supreme court, but the more AG's Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #9
My first reaction was to scoff at this. Skinner Dec 2016 #11
CA Attorney General Kamala Harris -ph # 916-322-3360 Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #12
Yesterday's tally was a 2,597,156 vote Clinton victory. still counting. Coyotl Dec 2016 #13
Wow! That graph!!! Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #17
Yeah, why are they just standing idle in neutral? lonestarnot Dec 2016 #14
Great post! Important to read. JudyM Dec 2016 #15
The Father of Birtherism bucolic_frolic Dec 2016 #16
Attorney General Phone numbers. Call! We just need one to take to Supreme Court Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #19
K&R!!!! 2naSalit Dec 2016 #20
Unilateral disarmament will not work. Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2016 #22
The concept is for the Supremes to invalidate winner-take-all across the country to comply with E.P. JudyM Dec 2016 #23
Interesting but wrong. sarisataka Dec 2016 #24
That's one way to look at it. Another is that that's right as long as it does not infringe on on Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #25
In Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court ruled states don't have the power to recount Eric J in MN Dec 2016 #35
Thanks, M45. Great o.p. Will call AG Beemer tomorrow. Mc Mike Dec 2016 #26
Awesome! Thank you! Let me know how phone call goes! Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #29
Called AG Beemer's office, spoke to H and she put me on with her supervisor, E. Mc Mike Dec 2016 #30
I could not gleam from this article how rounding can properly divide a state's EC vote count Stargleamer Dec 2016 #27
Does "equal protection" imply "equal representation"? world wide wally Dec 2016 #28
We don't even know if the votes are reliable tc123 Dec 2016 #31
??? Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #32
Distractionary post. nt. Mc Mike Dec 2016 #33
The Electors Trust provides free and strictly confidential legal support to any Elector who wishes t Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #34
Considering that some red state electors are saying that they won't vote for Trump Thor_MN Dec 2016 #36
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why Bush v. Gore might me...»Reply #1