Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(59,510 posts)
42. You never know the path not taken - and he would have had to beat Clinton in the primaries
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 11:59 AM
Jan 2017

I realize you state that you "think" Biden would have won. Others have said that Sanders would have won. In reality, we do not know. In the case of Biden, he was tied more tightly to Obama than Clinton was. One thing that is interesting is that he was seen as opposite of Clinton in being LESS a hawk than Obama where HRC was more hawkish. However, Biden was the point person on Iraq in the first term. He was the person who was unable to get a SOFA agreement, leading to the US removing all our military - which the Republicans blame for ISIS being able to grow. (It is very likely NO ONE could have gotten that SOFA and imagine the uproar had Obama left troops there without that protection - but I am speaking politics.)

There is less difference in backgrounds than the image makers projected. Clinton was born to a middle class Chicago area family and managed to get into Wellesley, then to Yale Law. Biden was born into a middle class family went to University of Delaware, then to Law School at Syracuse. One big difference was that Biden, at least in law school, was a pretty lazy student -- while that has never been said of Clinton. It is funny that that difference in personality, in politics, might actually work in Biden's favor (as with George Bush). (A hard point for me to accept as I personally was a serious, good student.)

Neither was born to the American elite -- and both got where they did through their personalities and intelligence. I agree that Biden seems far more accessible to lower middle class and middle class people - as does Bernie Sanders, than Hillary Clinton. The question is whether Biden, running as the third term of Obama, would have reached the disaffected, frustrated, economically depressed people who were lost in PA, MI and WI when HRC ran and it was seen as the either the third Clinton term or the third term of Obama.

During the month or so when Biden played with the idea of running, we got what was likely only a fraction of the attacks from the Clinton team that would have happened if he ran. Suddenly, there was a plethora of stories that all characterized Biden as a loose cannon, silly - even loony. This for a man who was in the Senate for decades, who ran major committees. The Onion seemed to have created a Biden meme that always was somewhat inappropriate. With many people getting their news from comedy shows, I suspect more people, if asked to name something Biden did would refer to something silly rather than his work leading the government effort against cancer, his foreign policy work, or his work in support of the economic recovery.

However, there were REAL things that would have been used against Biden. He was terrible as the Chair of the Judiciary Committee when the Clarence Thomas hearings occurred, he was the sponsor - not co-sponsor or someone who merely voted for - the crime bill from the Clinton years. Representing Delaware, he voted for every single one of the bad bankruptcy bills. Had Biden entered the race, Clinton would have thrown the kitchen sink at Biden -- as her team did against Sanders. All three of these would have put him on the defense with key Democratic constituencies. (It is impossible to mentally play out how a Clinton/Biden/Sanders primary would have played out. It might depend on how much of Sander's support was really Anybody but Clinton. You could make a case that any of the three win. )

Imagine that Biden did win that primary, which would have been nasty. Clinton supporters mention how all the differences spelled out in the primary hurt Clinton. However, Biden, who actually was the sponsor of legislation protecting women, would have been labeled negatively by the Clintons because of how Anita Hill was treated. Biden would likely not have abandoned Obama on TPP, which Clinton would have demonized and with the bankruptcy bills and the crime bills, it is very posibble that Biden's jovial, outgoing, extroverted personality would not have been enough to win those same rust belt. Not to mention -- given that HRC said in her book and elsewhere that she was against pulling out all the troops in Iraq. She would have set up that issue (which the Republicans tried to use against her by tying her to Obama) for the Republicans.

I suspect that Biden's decision not to run was partly that emotionally after the death of his son, he was not up to doing everything that needed to be done. I suspect that the certainty that he would face a knock down fight with the Clintons was a major deterrent because it could have lost what then was seen as an election we were favored in and cause a war within the party. That Obama had made his preference clear at least by 2013.

I think Biden could have won [View all] hollowdweller Jan 2017 OP
I agree. elleng Jan 2017 #1
He and a whole long list of folks who havent been the target of 3 decades of Eliot Rosewater Jan 2017 #26
Hell yes he would have won. Binders Keepers Jan 2017 #2
And would have made plenty of entertaining gaffes Binders Keepers Jan 2017 #3
No gaffe's in that interview. hollowdweller Jan 2017 #43
he is a white male so he would have been able to get away with things that Clinton could not JI7 Jan 2017 #4
I'm really not sure if going to the right of Clinton would have won. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #5
For sure Biden is more conservative except on foreign policy hollowdweller Jan 2017 #46
Agree with your overall thoughts here. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #49
If they helped him they didn't land. hollowdweller Jan 2017 #56
Do you have an example of an attack line not used that you think would have landed? NCTraveler Jan 2017 #67
Grow up. hollowdweller Jan 2017 #68
I don't get your reply. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #73
Recently joe biden told trump to grow up drray23 Jan 2017 #80
Kick for transparency. Nt NCTraveler Jan 2017 #75
Yep redstateblues Jan 2017 #6
4th time's the charm? WhiteTara Jan 2017 #7
Really.. I love Joe.. but all this talk about who would have won who Cha Jan 2017 #8
Agreed! And a bit counter productive as the players that "could have" won't be in 2020 NWCorona Jan 2017 #12
And it is MFM008 Jan 2017 #18
Its all specilation, and by now, it just keeps the lrimary fedteting, and serves no dionysus Jan 2017 #25
I started this not so much about speculation as to who could have won but hollowdweller Jan 2017 #44
I'm gonna still say he could have won but you've made the best point so far NWCorona Jan 2017 #11
In those cases he had not been V treestar Jan 2017 #34
So, 4th time's the charm. WhiteTara Jan 2017 #36
My point was it wouldn't be the 4th time treestar Jan 2017 #38
But it would still be his 4th effort. WhiteTara Jan 2017 #40
If he would have survived the primary MichMan Jan 2017 #9
Not sure the DNC would have conspired with Clinton against Biden though hollowdweller Jan 2017 #47
Still with that nonsense? Clinton's delegate lead was from the South. The DNC had nothing to do with stevenleser Jan 2017 #63
It's just like the hacking. Nobody knows what effect it had in the whole thing. hollowdweller Jan 2017 #70
No, it's not. Not at all. The DNC had zero effect on the primary. nt stevenleser Jan 2017 #71
i'm sure Biden didn't run in deference to Hillary onetexan Jan 2017 #10
why is Jill's lack of ambition such a positive and notable trait? bettyellen Jan 2017 #15
Lack of ambition?? onetexan Jan 2017 #16
You're the one who noted she could have taught at major universities but scaled back her ambitions.. bettyellen Jan 2017 #17
Sheesh no need to have an inferiority complex onetexan Jan 2017 #33
She and FLOTUS DashOneBravo Jan 2017 #61
Really being good and sticking with the little guy is a good thing. hollowdweller Jan 2017 #48
Interesting point of view. I was truly puzzled by the post but I really do not know much bettyellen Jan 2017 #62
Joe Biden is like Bizarro world Hillary Clinton in that... SaschaHM Jan 2017 #13
I honestly think many BOBers didn't care about policies as much as hating HRC .... bettyellen Jan 2017 #14
I agree. They anyone but Hillary crowd treestar Jan 2017 #37
And loving old white men. WhiteTara Jan 2017 #39
Spot on! eom BlueMTexpat Jan 2017 #53
Well, you know I might resemble that statement. hollowdweller Jan 2017 #54
I agree Biden could have taken it - his personality alone is more "relatable" and "likable" bettyellen Jan 2017 #64
Much as I hate it, being a white man would have helped treestar Jan 2017 #35
So do you think that is a weakness with Ellison? hollowdweller Jan 2017 #69
Who is Ellison in this context? treestar Jan 2017 #74
Bingo! The double standard stinks. JHan Jan 2017 #77
Seems another possibility. Orsino Jan 2017 #19
He was my first choice by far since Obama won in 2012, but I quickly pivoted to Hillary Grey Lemercier Jan 2017 #20
Biden had some major BlueMTexpat Jan 2017 #24
I was 10 months old then, so do not remember this, obviously. I assume he overcame Grey Lemercier Jan 2017 #28
You and other people your age might have heard more about that hearing had he run karynnj Jan 2017 #45
He has been an excellent VP BlueMTexpat Jan 2017 #52
He needed up redeeming himself treestar Jan 2017 #41
Men WERE forgiven more easily. BlueMTexpat Jan 2017 #50
good point about Kerry treestar Jan 2017 #57
Many who couldn't forgive her (like the JPR'ers) had no problem with Edwards, Kerry, Biden. JTFrog Jan 2017 #60
I'd rather not believe that, but there is no other reasonable explanation for that behavior. nt stevenleser Jan 2017 #65
Just as there is no BlueMTexpat Jan 2017 #66
Ok, but he didn't cuz he didn't run. zappaman Jan 2017 #21
I think he could have easily beaten someone like Trump or Cruz mtnsnake Jan 2017 #22
Biden v Kasich is the one matchup out of all possibilties I would be afraid to predict. Grey Lemercier Jan 2017 #29
Why do we keep seeing these BlueMTexpat Jan 2017 #23
After a devastating loss, people just like to speculate with no harm intended. It's human nature. mtnsnake Jan 2017 #27
I agree. It's too bad he wasn't running but I think the choice had been made years ago. jalan48 Jan 2017 #30
Joe is one of the most likeable politicians in DC. ... spin Jan 2017 #31
Absolutely he would've won! nt Raine Jan 2017 #32
You never know the path not taken - and he would have had to beat Clinton in the primaries karynnj Jan 2017 #42
Right you are randr Jan 2017 #51
No Democrat was gonna beat Russia who was teaming with Drump, Comey, wiki et al. nt JTFrog Jan 2017 #55
SO if we could only go back in time to 2015, and if we could then convince Biden to run, guillaumeb Jan 2017 #58
me too. ShaquantaBrown Jan 2017 #59
Biden's problem BlueStateLib Jan 2017 #72
I don't think he would have beat Hillary in the primary. Chemisse Jan 2017 #76
Hillary would have crushed Biden in a closed primary HoneyBadger Jan 2017 #78
It's over. Move on. Squinch Jan 2017 #79
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I think Biden could have ...»Reply #42