Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
5. I partially agree, but partially disagree
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:01 AM
Jul 2014

I really agree that Viagra should not be covered by any insurance under the ACA. People who want that can find a Cadillac type of insurance to cover it.

As for a vasectomy, that's a bit different. Having had one at an early age (and I do mean early) I think insurance should cover it since it is a one time out patient procedure. I'm not sure how much it is now, but when I got mine it ran about $200.

I fundamentally disagree with the Hobby Lobby decision, but at the same time I don't think any birth control should be limited. It's not pitting women against men or men against women, but allowing a choice for couples or individuals who decide they either don't want children or the time is not right.

I understand that women need birth control for other reasons then to prevent pregnancies. When I was in college I was dating a woman who's menstruation was so bad, sometimes she would double over in pain. Even though I could not feel the pain, it didn't mean I couldn't feel empathy for her. There was in fact one time when I insisted she go to the emergency room and drove her there (I remember that because the doctor was a major dick).

So in my opinion it's not really right to put Viagra and vasectomies on the same stage.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Any word if a test-case i...»Reply #5