Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Bernie Sanders Lobs A Crippling Blow At The Kochs With Bill To Publicly Fund Elections [View all]artislife
(9,497 posts)149. This reply isn't just for you but it is a common post by H supporters
It is sort of the answer---it won't pass...or...the republican congress will block it...good luck with trying to find a coalition...
Can you see why that is troubling when the implication is that Hillary will get things through congress.
If none of the other components change, what is she able to get through?
It doesn't sound like it will be anything that a progressive will rally behind. We had a lot of compromises in the original Clinton presidency, and they really hurt the 99%
This may be why many who don't support H just brush these comments aside. We don't just want to pass anything to get a pass, we want to pass something important.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
238 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie Sanders Lobs A Crippling Blow At The Kochs With Bill To Publicly Fund Elections [View all]
99th_Monkey
Aug 2015
OP
Even if Sanders gets elected President this isn't a "sure-fire" thing while
PoliticAverse
Aug 2015
#10
Third Way is a policy advocacy group...it has never advocated for or against a candidate.
brooklynite
Aug 2015
#180
I assume as well that Sanders will take the existing campaign financing...
brooklynite
Aug 2015
#181
Citizens United does not have to be overturned in order to pass Publicly Funded Elections.
PotatoChip
Aug 2015
#193
The guy in post 3 said the sure fire way to get this passed is to elect Sanders
mythology
Aug 2015
#198
Who else would suggest it, no insider with all the right connections , Ha ?
orpupilofnature57
Aug 2015
#201
That Youth jobs provision had co-sponsors, you know. It wasn't a bill, it was an amendment
MADem
Aug 2015
#123
I like the way you delve into a subject, MADem. Bernie has co-sponsored many bills in the Senate.
senz
Aug 2015
#140
Thank you for again illustrating my point. That is not what the President signed.
MADem
Aug 2015
#230
So why can't former Secretary, now private citizen, Clinton take a position now?
Armstead
Aug 2015
#59
Have you heard about that thing called citizen activism? A concept starts from somewhere,
Luminous Animal
Aug 2015
#27
Is that what Bernie said. He was holding out for juicy or significant legislation?
Sheepshank
Aug 2015
#42
No--I wasn't wrong. Look downthread. "Passing the Senate" does not mean "signed into law."
MADem
Aug 2015
#231
A lot of people don't understand that the controlling authority for anything involving appropriation
MADem
Aug 2015
#232
The article acknowledges that the proposed law couldn't require public funding or limit donations.
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#91
My reflexive reply was in response to reflexive rejection of everything Bernie does
Armstead
Aug 2015
#130
Yes for real public financing of campaigns a constitutional amendment would be needed.
PoliticAverse
Aug 2015
#19
they aren't concerns they are what SCOTUS says (ie the way the law works in this country)
dsc
Aug 2015
#22
Co-sponsored maybe, but that's something very different now isn't it? The implications is that
Ed Suspicious
Aug 2015
#86
As Andy Stephenson would say "Voter Verified Paper Ballots". Stop election rigging. nt
Snotcicles
Aug 2015
#18
Old "power hungry" Bernie? Old "personal ambition" Bernie? Sounds legit.
Ed Suspicious
Aug 2015
#102
Sanders is the ONLY POTUS candidate who has pledged to ONLY appoint SC nominees
99th_Monkey
Aug 2015
#52
Hillary Clinton’s litmus test for Supreme Court nominees: a pledge to overturn Citizens United
Gothmog
Aug 2015
#167
The only real difference on this issue between Sanders and Clinton is who can win in Nov. 2016
Gothmog
Aug 2015
#171
From the article: "the potential legislation would not mandate public funding or limit donations."
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#87
This is a showboat piece of legislation. It will go nowhere. Doesn't anyone understand how
MADem
Aug 2015
#122
Like Bernie is the only person who introduces such bills. No otehr "showboaters" in Congress?
Armstead
Aug 2015
#131
Who has made that claim? Please point out the person who says he's alone in doing this?
MADem
Aug 2015
#173
Kucinich did this in his last Presidential romp with the "Department of Peace" schtick.
MADem
Aug 2015
#176
Yeah, but it's still so precious watching the SAME CROWD that demanded that Obama pound the podium
Number23
Aug 2015
#196
I just get sad that so many people don't understand the basics...is the school system that bad?
MADem
Aug 2015
#197
If you can see all of this crying and whining and STILL not realize that pounding podiums
Number23
Aug 2015
#229
The people getting angry at me need to understand the purpose of Ways and Means. Hell, you'd think
MADem
Aug 2015
#234
Reccing for pissing off all the right people, both in Washington and here on DU.
beam me up scottie
Aug 2015
#126
brooklynite is much better informed than your average GD-P Bernie Basher.
beam me up scottie
Aug 2015
#203
write that bill and please push it now, Senator Sanders. even if they table it, please push it now.
Sunlei
Aug 2015
#144
outstanding. Now Let's watch the Turd Way Club & their Repukes Comrades block or vote against it
2banon
Aug 2015
#158
Perhaps people would take this more seriously if the headline wasn't so ridiculous
Freddie Stubbs
Aug 2015
#164