Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)Why more debates are good for Clinton [View all]
According to this opinion piece, Clinton and the Democratic party as a whole are being hurt by too few debates.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-more-debates-are-good-for-clinton/2015/09/07/78d8e5c4-55
Excerpts:
At this stage, most Americans outside of Washington, and perhaps Iowa and New Hampshire, are not paying very close attention to the election. Based on the mainstream coverage, the typical voters perception of the presidential campaign is likely to reflect two things: Donald Trumps insults and Clintons e-mails. And that means, in the absence of a more visible debate among Democrats, the competition between Trump and his Republican opponents a bitter clash of the far right and further right is defining the narrative.
As OMalley said in an interview with liberal radio host Bill Press, We have good candidates, and we offer the ideas that will serve our country and get wages to go up rather than down. But without more opportunities for Democratic candidates to address a national audience, the airwaves are being dominated entirely by talk of the Republican side.
To put it bluntly, Democrats should want more debates not only because of fairness or democratic ideals but also because they will be good for the party and Clinton should want more debates because they will be good for her campaign. The party should embrace the opportunity to change the conversation before the 2016 narrative is set in stone.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
23 replies, 3502 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
23 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thanks for bringing it to my attention that this is the first year of the exclusivity rule.
SouthernProgressive
Sep 2015
#18