Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary's inability to answer ANYTHING directly is infuriating and will be her undoing. [View all]Duval
(4,280 posts)59. I have noticed that she doesn't give
clear answers on issues. However, she seems to be getting better at it, since Sanders' stand on issues is resonating so well with so many.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
168 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary's inability to answer ANYTHING directly is infuriating and will be her undoing. [View all]
ram2008
Sep 2015
OP
7 out of context snippets each logically unworthy of any conclusion sown together to reach another conclusion?
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#2
The OP is a logical trainwreck, there is nothing to discuss, which was my point.
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#7
There are 7 clipped quotes to reach 7 conclusions in the post, and 1 final one, all unconvincing, that is all I am saying.
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#24
Believe me, I am as passionate about the Keystone pipeline as any other thing. If Clinton comes
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#48
Well, we know where YOU stand, then...there's still no good reason for your candidate to be vague.
Ken Burch
Sep 2015
#102
It's easy to say the OP is a "logical trainwreck" but harder to actually give evidence. Tell us her
rhett o rick
Sep 2015
#155
She has a loyalty to this administration and really doesn't want to undermine Obama.
Laser102
Sep 2015
#29
That is so perfectly logical a thought that I am sure you will be soon be showered with praise.
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#36
The Constitution? I didn't think any of these issues threaten our Constitution.
Laser102
Sep 2015
#60
Bingo. She doesn't want to answer the question. It's that simple and it's obvious.
merrily
Sep 2015
#126
If her loyalty to the Obama administration prevents her from taking her owwn stances on things,
JDPriestly
Sep 2015
#101
It doesn't do anything to affect this adminstration for HRC or anyone else running in 2016
Ken Burch
Sep 2015
#104
Oh plez. That's a terrible rationalization. If she wants to be president she should tell us how
rhett o rick
Sep 2015
#156
I think the correct spelling is "colander" - you know, the thing with lots of holes in it?
erronis
Sep 2015
#47
Please post her statements expressing her stance on each of the issues she equivocated on in her
JDPriestly
Sep 2015
#98
Then please find us her "in context" responses that actually tell us where she stands. I can't
rhett o rick
Sep 2015
#154
We can add fracking and college tuition to the list in the OP to which she has failed to
rhett o rick
Sep 2015
#159
Why is she 'putting the administration on notice'?? What does the administration
sabrina 1
Sep 2015
#3
Well, it makes her look like she doesn't want to tell us where she stands. That's
sabrina 1
Sep 2015
#14
I realize that quantum physics and recent quantum chromodynamics theories suggest
ChairmanAgnostic
Sep 2015
#21
As best I can recall, during my first few months here, I was timid. Posted a lot of LOLs and K & Rs
merrily
Sep 2015
#131
It would be real easy to counter what the "Bernie crowd" is saying by actually giving us some
rhett o rick
Sep 2015
#158
"She's the only one cranking out policy proposals". "He's cranking out policy proposals..."
DisgustipatedinCA
Sep 2015
#91
There are no "policy proposals". The OP gives her stands on issues. If you have better info
rhett o rick
Sep 2015
#157
Infuriating to people who already hate her, sure. Some people prefer the GWB "I don't do nuance"
DanTex
Sep 2015
#23
However, she is excellent at evolving (aka waffling) and speaks argle-bargle fluently.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Sep 2015
#40
of course, she has to run everything by her marketing team and image consultants.
bowens43
Sep 2015
#44
Unkind to HRC. I'm sure she meant that the minimum wage should be higher than $15 in places
merrily
Sep 2015
#132
The pattern is to consider both sides to be wrong and devise a plan to get both sides to shut up.
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2015
#54
they honestly think this waffling will let them appeal to both sides of any issue
MisterP
Sep 2015
#58
K&R - Great questions. Good OP.. It's esp. disturbing seeing all 7 in one place. -nt-
99th_Monkey
Sep 2015
#64
The worst aspects of all of the last three administrations put together.
The Green Manalishi
Sep 2015
#107
"I hope that clarifies and that this could be the last word on those words..."
sorechasm
Sep 2015
#167
She has to catch the fly ball first, and then catch the guy stealing third base.
sorechasm
Sep 2015
#168
You forget what she does say. She thinks Congress is shameful towards women for defunding Planned
McCamy Taylor
Sep 2015
#114
Her non-answers reveal her positions. I can answer pretty accurately for you.
NorthCarolina
Sep 2015
#138
Yes a couple more are college tuition and fracking. Her responses to both were rhetoric.
rhett o rick
Sep 2015
#160