2016 Postmortem

PragmaticLiberal2.0

(2 posts)

21. Response

Sat Oct 3, 2015, 12:31 AM

Oct 2015

I think they should have a bidding process to determine more debates since that is clearly what Democrats want in the election. Democrats want more debates period. So the process should include more debates. The bidding process should happen sooner than later. I know schedule favor Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, and South Carolina. Though placing the debates at strategic times before Super Tuesday is definitely important. The debates would be televised.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Debbie Wasserman Schultz... Again... Think The Debates Aren't Rigged ??? [View all] WillyT Oct 2015 OP

End the nonsense will you. SIX debates is PLENTY and the SAME as in other years. RBInMaine Oct 2015 #1

And very "conveniently" timed so that the first one is AFTER the voter registration deadline in NY cascadiance Oct 2015 #3

Four. Fawke Em Oct 2015 #4

In other years there were no penalties for participating in non-sanctioned debates n/t eridani Oct 2015 #6

You're right! Watching 6 debates with Hillary trying to avoid exposing her support raindaddy Oct 2015 #14

Right, I mean who would want voters.... daleanime Oct 2015 #15

They are about as rigged as the Benghazi hearing are political. nt Snotcicles Oct 2015 #40

Fuckin' A right! PUNISH those who don't toe the DNC line on debates. cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #17

OK, fine. sgtbenobo Oct 2015 #29

Not the SAME as in other years. TM99 Oct 2015 #30

it is not the same as other years questionseverything Oct 2015 #34

Six is "plenty" except no party has had so few debates in past 50 years Report1212 Oct 2015 #36

Hillary wanted a 22nd one in 2008 Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #37

Hit... Run... Crickets... Thank You For Your... "Participation"... WillyT Oct 2015 #44

Would you just stop. sheshe2 Oct 2015 #2

Perhaps you should stop Fearless Oct 2015 #11

Not enough pictures of cops using black men as props? I can see how that would get boring... cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #19

Seriously? LuvLoogie Oct 2015 #22

Srsly. cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #24

This! sheshe2 Oct 2015 #45

Lest we forget... cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #46

So cops using black men as props is my fault now? sheshe2 Oct 2015 #47

May I suggest you take a break 840high Oct 2015 #26

I believe many will end up watching the debates when they are uploaded to the web. NorthCarolina Oct 2015 #5

Not to mention the DNC audience is by invitation only. HooptieWagon Oct 2015 #7

no doubt restorefreedom Oct 2015 #10

I did not know that. Invitation by donation. BUY an invite. So unlike Hillary. cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #25

I will refrain from saying exactly what DWS and the entire DNC can do. 99Forever Oct 2015 #8

Oh, so I was wrong left-of-center2012 Oct 2015 #12

Interesting Ichigo Kurosaki Oct 2015 #28

I'll never understand the mindset of people who would argue in favor of fewer debates.. frylock Oct 2015 #9

Oh, c'mon, Frylock! Old Crow Oct 2015 #13

I like unicorns. How can I help to prevent such a senseless tragedy? frylock Oct 2015 #16

The Divine Debbie knows the ways of the unicorns far better than I. Old Crow Oct 2015 #18

Vote for Hillary and end the silly need for debates with joke candidates. DRoseDARs Oct 2015 #20

I don't really care ohheckyeah Oct 2015 #32

it is about democracy and freedom of speech questionseverything Oct 2015 #35

They have freedom of speech ohheckyeah Oct 2015 #38

the primary is exactly the time for getting everything out in the open questionseverything Oct 2015 #39

You really don't ohheckyeah Oct 2015 #41

Response PragmaticLiberal2.0 Oct 2015 #21

6 is plenty! You know why? whatchamacallit Oct 2015 #23

....x10+ 840high Oct 2015 #27

Why on EARTH would we want debates? Aerows Oct 2015 #31

Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #33

That's Democratic rather than democratic. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #42

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #43