Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
12. You really have no idea of the law or history of what you're proclaiming.
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 04:27 PM
Oct 2015

1) Government agencies get together after-the-fact to determine if anything should be retroactivity classified. Hillary committed no felony due to retroactive classification. Look up CIA Director John Deutch. Tell us how his mishandling of classified materials was different.

Where's the indictment? LOL As in Deutch's case, the decision whether to convene a GJ is made by the AG. As in that case, the decision may be to not decide until the term is over, and to leave it to the President to pardon, as Bill did Deutch.

2) Do you have 100% confirmation Hillary's private server was hacked? The irony is that the government serves were hacked without-a-doubt. Doesn't matter - we know that Blumenthal's email was hacked and that Hillary's server wasn't authorized. It's a prima facie violation under the section of the statute I cited above.

3) The law regarding e-mail laws changed after she became Secretary of State. Look it up. Seriously. Seriously, you don't know what you're talking about. The Department regulation changed after she left state. The Executive Order that made foreign government information presumed classified was issued in 2009. The statute is the Espionage Act of 1917, which certainly predates Hillary's activities. She continued to use her unauthorized system from 2009 until 2013.

4) Hillary viewed all marked classified material on secured systems separate from her e-mail system. Irrelevant. She sent and hosted numerous presumed classified materials on her unauthorized private email server. She broke the law, and would have been indicted by now if she, like CIA Director Deutch, wasn't too big to indict.

Post removed Post removed Oct 2015 #1
How is this relevant? JTShroyer Oct 2015 #2
It's not relevant. Very cheap attack with zero merit. NCTraveler Oct 2015 #4
Thank You!! JTShroyer Oct 2015 #5
Wow. Agschmid Oct 2015 #27
So, your issue is with their time on this board and that they are active(busy little beaver)? NCTraveler Oct 2015 #3
They are a Bernie supporter JTShroyer Oct 2015 #7
Um, dude, you are not doing Bernie any favors with this tripe. KamaAina Oct 2015 #6
Don't take that one to the bank. leveymg Oct 2015 #8
Wrong JTShroyer Oct 2015 #10
What government servers were hacked? Link? [n/t] Maedhros Oct 2015 #11
These were... Agschmid Oct 2015 #28
We will no doubt find out more as time goes on. riversedge Oct 2015 #33
Doesn't matter. Fawke Em Oct 2015 #44
You really have no idea of the law or history of what you're proclaiming. leveymg Oct 2015 #12
Still on the "Presumed Classification" nonsense, huh? DanTex Oct 2015 #14
Did you fail to read down to the bottom of the first section, Dan? leveymg Oct 2015 #15
You do understand that this is a sub-point, in reference to the requirements for a DanTex Oct 2015 #17
The presumed classified materials that went over HRCs server were classified when created. leveymg Oct 2015 #19
Like I said, you are making that up. DanTex Oct 2015 #20
DanTex -- just stop trying JTShroyer Oct 2015 #21
JT - You are just misinformed. leveymg Oct 2015 #23
This is a witch-hunt -- nothing more, nothing less: JTShroyer Oct 2015 #25
Trey Gowdy is an idiot and couldn't conduct an Inquisition if you gave him a pointed cap leveymg Oct 2015 #22
You actually support wasting 4.5 million in tax dollars on the 8th Benghazi (e-mail) committee? JTShroyer Oct 2015 #26
I'm glad you put a question mark at the end of that sentence. leveymg Oct 2015 #34
You still haven't answered: JTShroyer Oct 2015 #36
The what has been explained. Do you mean where or when? leveymg Oct 2015 #37
Where has this (conspiracy theory) JTShroyer Oct 2015 #38
It's not a conspiracy theory as I don't present it as leveymg Oct 2015 #39
What did Hillary do that was different than previous Secretaries of State JTShroyer Oct 2015 #40
Under the 2009 EO, she was not legally permitted to use her private server for classified coms. leveymg Oct 2015 #41
Was it a law at the time she became Secretary of State? JTShroyer Oct 2015 #42
The EO date was 12/29/09. Regardless, she continued to operate a private server for >3 yrs leveymg Oct 2015 #43
Thread Count bpj62 Oct 2015 #9
The OP is flat-out misinformation or disinformation. Poster is probably just misinformed. leveymg Oct 2015 #13
Ridiculous,I don't care who you're supporting, sufrommich Oct 2015 #16
The 8th Benghazi committee by itself is the longest investigation in American history: JTShroyer Oct 2015 #24
We are sick and tired of hearing about ya' damn emails. Agschmid Oct 2015 #30
Thanks Bernie (I'll give credit where credit is due!) JTShroyer Oct 2015 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Oct 2015 #18
Is the OP a little too pro Hillary? sufrommich Oct 2015 #29
Something like that... Agschmid Oct 2015 #31
It *IS* a non-issue and has wasted 4.5 million in tax dollars JTShroyer Oct 2015 #32
LOVE that last gif. beaglelover Oct 2015 #45
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»E-Mail Facts Everyone Mus...»Reply #12