Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Salon: "Hillary Not Electable in General Campaign" [View all]leftofcool
(19,460 posts)14. Well, "other" things are so I guess this is as well.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
238 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
With the bashing of Hillary here we are helping the GOP have a clean sweep in 2016. The GOP is
kelliekat44
Nov 2015
#155
An important question is how is Bernie going to win without the support of the minorities.
olegramps
Nov 2015
#194
Right they would rather stand in line for hours to vote for the candidate that helped push 3 strike
Vincardog
Nov 2015
#233
I am sure he will overcome any perceived lack of favor. I don't worry about specious claims.
Vincardog
Nov 2015
#236
Its not a fine line when people keep shoveling the SOS from this moron....
Historic NY
Nov 2015
#130
The article shows why Dems should vote for Bernie in the primary. And Goodman says why
merrily
Nov 2015
#102
The endless attacks are something to behold. I have to give it to Karl, he has orchestrated
randys1
Nov 2015
#4
IT says she is not electable? If it says that, then it is even worse rightwing bullshit
randys1
Nov 2015
#27
so who is claiming she is NOT electable? YOU or the article, using those exact words?
randys1
Nov 2015
#33
So it is you, and no the facts dont show any such thing, but more importantly is your
randys1
Nov 2015
#35
No, I am upset that you are on Democratic Underground promoting the idea that our
randys1
Nov 2015
#45
Oh wait, now you are changing what you are saying, how about revising the thread title then
randys1
Nov 2015
#50
No, nothing factual about yout comment, but you know that. What your comment is
randys1
Nov 2015
#58
Not that I've noticed--and he claims to be a supporter of and worker for Sanders.
merrily
Nov 2015
#98
I think you reported not only the facts, but also the conclusion you came to based on
Cal33
Nov 2015
#112
Another poster on DU saying the leading candidate cant win. You cant do that here.
randys1
Nov 2015
#72
If she has electability problems, it's far better to ventilate that before the primary.
merrily
Nov 2015
#147
What you wrote above "Only in your bernie bubble" is also stating your opinion based
Cal33
Nov 2015
#118
"our candidate"? don't you mean your candidate? Hint: the Primary isn't over quite yet.
99th_Monkey
Nov 2015
#78
Oh i read it, and the NOT ELECTABLE wasnt in it, which is why I pointed that out over
randys1
Nov 2015
#108
Maybe not, but the GOP agenda is to destroy Hillary before we find out who is electable.
randys1
Nov 2015
#21
Exactly. Sanders has been spared the GOP onslaught up to now, while Hillary has been viciously hit.
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#63
I think the GOP is deliberately avoiding mentioning Bernie in order to help keep his
Cal33
Nov 2015
#138
If the GOP is afraid of Bernie, why are they attacking Hillary and donating to Bernie?
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#174
Priebus probably has some trick up his sleeve with an ulterior motive, I guess. Sanders has stated
Cal33
Nov 2015
#204
Well.....then if that's true and Bernie loses to someone who can't win the general
Cali_Democrat
Nov 2015
#8
Nope. Bernie polls better against the repubs because he doesn't act like one
berni_mccoy
Nov 2015
#10
As a dispassionate observer I am compelled to admit none of the points you made...
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2015
#84
i was 6 -- i believe this was a dishonest alert, and anyone *should* be able to see that
nashville_brook
Nov 2015
#91
Some juror should alert on these results. Juror 2 should not sit on juries if he or she is not
merrily
Nov 2015
#61
"I didn't read it" "I don't care what the issues are" "I don't want to debate, I want to talk about
MisterP
Nov 2015
#209
You got alerted on for criticizing an professional author who is not a DUer? Seems implausible.
merrily
Nov 2015
#80
I am going to guess you should have used a name. I would never have hidden any criticism of a
merrily
Nov 2015
#96
If the party wants to win, they will back the candidate who has enough crossover appeal
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#40
Oh yes he will, he has already! He's FURTHER ahead in bringing out those who had given up on the
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#217
More ridiculous source shaming. You named two liberal sources. Your real complaint is anything
merrily
Nov 2015
#65
Who has been published by 2 liberal sites. Sticking with your issue seems to be criticism of HRC.
merrily
Nov 2015
#83
They both do their share of Hit pieces on Hillary. But as I said, I was not dissing the
riversedge
Nov 2015
#88
I WILL vote for the democrat in the elections. Period. As I write this I'm having a major argument..
BlueJazz
Nov 2015
#119
The %'s looked pretty favorable for Hillary in spite of how the author was spinning them
The_Casual_Observer
Nov 2015
#125
The general is a long way off but the polling Hillary VS Crazy Republicans worries me.
hollowdweller
Nov 2015
#127
How does this H.A. Goodman get his articles published?!? Does he pay for them? I honestly don't get
Metric System
Nov 2015
#143
"Because there's not a dime's worth of difference between Al Gore and George Bush"
greenman3610
Nov 2015
#178
Yea yea yea Sanders will not be the DNC nominee and the best candidate is Hillary Clinton over any
Thinkingabout
Nov 2015
#202
This is the worthless opinion of H.A. Goodman, a Rand Paul 2016 supporter who likes to pose
pnwmom
Nov 2015
#220
I think the Hillary people are counting on the GOP candidate being horrible, and he will be
Fast Walker 52
Nov 2015
#225