Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)The New Yorker: "Bernie Sanders’s New Deal Socialism" [View all]
Interesting article! Here's an excerpt:Speaking on his political philosophy at Georgetown yesterday, the Vermont senator and Democratic Presidential candidate opened with a long invocation of Franklin Roosevelt and the social protections that the New Deal created: minimum wages, retirement benefits, banking regulation, the forty-hour workweek. Roosevelts opponents attacked all these good things as socialism, Sanders reminded his listeners.... Let me define for you, simply and straightforwardly, what democratic socialism means to me, Sanders said. It builds on what Franklin Delano Roosevelt said when he fought for guaranteed economic rights for all Americans.
This isnt the first time Sanders has defined his position from the right flank of history. Pressed in the most recent Democratic debate to say how high he would take the marginal income tax, Sanders answered that it would be less than the ninety (actually ninety-two) per-cent level under the Eisenhower Administration. He added, to cheers and laughter, Im not that much of a socialist compared to Eisenhower.... Bernie Sanderss socialism is Eisenhowers and F.D.R.s world if Reagan had never happened: economic security updated by the continuing revolutions in gender, cultural pluralism, and the struggle for racial justice. In a word, Denmark... The mid-century political settlement between government and markets that Eisenhower took for granted never really had a name. ... Welfare capitalism, which is a pretty accurate name for a market system that redistributes for common benefit, sounds like the worst of both worlds. Socialism is historically inaccurate, and using it to name Eisenhower-era welfarism may come at the cost of further burying its other, more radical meanings. But some of the terms appeal, as a name for Sanderss program, is that it sounds more radical than it is. ... In this way, Sanderss use of the word harkens back to pre-Soviet, even pre-Marxist socialism. Then the term named a clutch of objections to industrial capitalism: the physical toll of the jobs, the equal and opposite toll of unemployment and economic crisis, widespread poverty and insecurity in a world where some lived in almost miraculous luxury. ... Eisenhowers world lacked a name for its settlement between government and markets partly because that settlement was the new normal, and the normal doesnt need a name. Mature capitalism was supposed to produce only a moderate level of inequality. A strong government, staffed by public-minded experts, would iron out economic wrinkles. The remaining problems for reformers were remedial: bringing in previously excluded populations, especially African-Americans and isolated Appalachians. For those already on the inside, the challenges were those of what the liberal economist John Kenneth Galbraith called the affluent society: how to want less, enjoy life more, and help build a post-materialist paradise of humanism. It is no coincidence that L.B.J., who supported the civil-rights movement and launched the War on Poverty, also promoted the National Endowment for the Humanities to enrich the lives of those whose historical labors were over. He described his Great Society program as seeking an economy that satisfied the desire for beauty and the hunger for community, where the meaning of our lives matches the marvelous products of our labor.
That is the lost world to which Sanderss socialism points back. The return of the label, though, doesnt mean that anyone knows how to get more radical than tacking toward Scandinavian social democracy, with its socialized health care and higher education and generous family leave. Sanders isnt much of a socialist compared to F.D.R., either. At the heart of Roosevelts program was the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, which greatly strengthened the hand of unions, essential parts of every welfare-capitalist order in the twentieth century, from Scandinavia to Canada. Sanders, astonishingly, didnt once mention unions in his Georgetown speech. Roosevelt proposed a maximum income of twenty-five thousand dollars (the equivalent of about four hundred thousand dollars today), which we wont be hearing from Sanders. Sanders socialism is a national living wage, free higher education, increased taxes on the wealthy, campaign-finance reform, and strong environmental and racial-justice policies.... The heart of Sanderss program, like F.D.R.s, is economic security: like F.D.R., he argues that true freedom does not occur without it. In the same way, he sees a strong government as protecting individualism from an economy that bats people around like the gods in Greek dramas. Calling this once mainstream idea socialism is a way of saying how far it feels from where we find ourselves now, how radical a step it would be to get back to it.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
25 replies, 2212 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (68)
ReplyReply to this post
25 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"In the same way, he sees a strong government as protecting individualism from an economy that...
RiverLover
Nov 2015
#3
Eloquent article! I wish the author, Jedediah Purdy, was Sander's speechwriter.
femmedem
Nov 2015
#4
Some pick their candidate based on ideology and some pick their candidate based on brand loyalty.
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#6
And in a system that promotes that style of thinking...we're kind of in trouble.
Gregorian
Nov 2015
#10
If we're worried about that phenomenon, imagine if we were sitting at the country club and looking
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#12
100 years ago the Democratic Party was conservative and the Republican Party was liberal. FDR, JFK,
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#21
There are those who seem blind to history (hell, half of them can't remember back to 2008)
Attorney in Texas
Dec 2015
#25