Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)Hillary Clinton’s no-tax pledge is Republican policy sprinkled with Third Way politics [View all]
otherwise known as rightwing-lite
Clintons no-tax pledge is Republican starve the beast policy infused with Third Way politics. It doubles down on the premise that taxes are bad, and insists that they should only ever be raised on other people no matter what higher taxes on the broader tax base could pay for. By promising to only raise taxes on incomes in the top one or two percent, Clinton is writing off most potential new revenue, and is therefore writing off the possibility of any semblance of a progressive economic agenda. However, by only foreclosing on the possibility of tax increases for 98 percent of Americans, as opposed to the full 100, she feels safe calling herself a progressive because Fox News will call her a class warrior. Sanders, rightly, thinks this claim is ridiculous.
Its ridiculous because Clintons pledge boxes her into policy corners that leave her with no choice but to use creative and regressive tweaks on otherwise good ideas in order to keep her price tags down. Take, for example, her proposed tax credit for caregivers. Clintons policy would provide a tax credit of up to $6,000 for families that are taking care of an elderly family member. However, the only way to keep the budgetary costs of such a program down $1 billion per year, by all available estimates is by making the credit non-refundable (you can only claim it against existing tax liability, as opposed to a refundable credit, which allows you to have negative liability). Making the credit non-refundable may make it less expensive, but it also makes it useless. As Demos analyst Matt Bruenig explained:http://americablog.com/2015/12/hillary-clinton-no-tax-pledge-republican-policy-third-way-politics.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
30 replies, 2372 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (21)
ReplyReply to this post
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton’s no-tax pledge is Republican policy sprinkled with Third Way politics [View all]
stupidicus
Dec 2015
OP
yep, that's the story I've been telling for the last decade and a half or more
stupidicus
Dec 2015
#18
In short, it means she's AGAINST removing the cap on payroll tax for Social Security!
cascadiance
Dec 2015
#26
Given Obama's original plans of having a two tiered cap (the second at $250k)...
cascadiance
Dec 2015
#29
Absolutely. Hillary would rather cut Social Security benefits than eliminate/raise the cap.
stillwaiting
Dec 2015
#28