Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gothmog

(145,184 posts)
35. Hillary Clinton’s litmus test for Supreme Court nominees: a pledge to overturn Citizens United
Mon Dec 28, 2015, 12:46 PM
Dec 2015

The only way to get rid of Citizens United is to make sure that a Democrat wins in 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/05/14/hillary-clintons-litmus-test-for-supreme-court-nominees-a-pledge-to-overturn-citizens-united/


Hillary Clinton told a group of her top fundraisers Thursday that if she is elected president, her nominees to the Supreme Court will have to share her belief that the court's 2010 Citizens United decision must be overturned, according to people who heard her remarks.

Clinton's emphatic opposition to the ruling, which allowed corporations and unions to spend unlimited sums on independent political activity, garnered the strongest applause of the afternoon from the more than 200 party financiers gathered in Brooklyn for a closed-door briefing from the Democratic candidate and her senior aides, according to some of those present.

"She got major applause when she said would not name anybody to the Supreme Court unless she has assurances that they would overturn" the decision, said one attendee, who, like others, requested anonymity to describe the private session.

If the make-up of the court does not change by 2017, four of the justices will be 78 years of age or older by the time the next president is inaugurated.

Clinton’s pledge to use opposition to Citizens United as a litmus test for Supreme Court nominees echoes the stance taken by Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who is challenging her for the Democratic nomination.

If the Democrats nominate a candidate who is not viable in the general election, then the GOP will control the direction of the SCOTUS for a generation and Citizens United will indeed be locked in. Right now, it would take the swing of one justice to get rid of CU
I stand with Ruth Bader Ginsburg and saltpoint Dec 2015 #1
That IS The POINT! A Corporatist Policy That Legalizes The Hijacking of OUR Political System CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #2
Justice Ginsburg is physically frail saltpoint Dec 2015 #4
Hence, All The More Important That Bernie Prevails in THIS Primary! CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #7
He does. I think he's refreshing saltpoint Dec 2015 #10
No corporatist will be trusted; that much is clear. eom Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #17
Cognitive dissonance, celebrity AND gender... chervilant Dec 2015 #3
Amazing and Well Said! CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #5
K&R 99Forever Dec 2015 #6
I would like to hear that he has the same type of litmus test for women's rights. This is why I seabeyond Dec 2015 #8
Watch a Couple of Bernie Speeches, Just Heard Him Discuss Women's Issues in a Recent Speech CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #9
Citizens United is a Democratic issue that has been discussed by our Democrats well before Sanders seabeyond Dec 2015 #11
Bernie was talking against CU when the case started. He has been supporting women's rights since Dont call me Shirley Dec 2015 #20
Do you think that a judge wanting to overturn CU would possibly *not* be pro-women's issues as well? JudyM Dec 2015 #22
Yes. I think there will be candidates that look at this issue more progressively and be able seabeyond Dec 2015 #23
When this battle comes as it will only with Bernie, the masses will tell congress as thier elections ViseGrip Dec 2015 #28
Disagreeing with you: there's a lot of interest in congressional races on DU! JudyM Dec 2015 #34
Both issues boil down to reason... ViseGrip Dec 2015 #25
If only I thought LWolf Dec 2015 #12
It Is OUR Solemn Responsibility To Attempt To "Inform" The Gullible CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #27
FYI Hillary Clinton made a CU Court pledge two weeks before Bernie... brooklynite Dec 2015 #13
Largely ignored, for an inconvenient truth Sheepshank Dec 2015 #30
Hillary Clinton is not a risk we can afford. Cassiopeia Dec 2015 #14
AGREED... Her Word Is As Strong Wet Tissue Paper CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #15
Ironic considering both Ginsburg and Breyer were Clinton appointees. Amimnoch Dec 2015 #16
Even more ironic in that the Clintons were the original targets of Citizens United Tanuki Dec 2015 #18
Bill Clinton Was The Harbinger of The DLC... Which Has Now Matured to A Terrifying Degree... CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #21
You're comparing with someone who actually had the opportunity to appoint to SCOTUS JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #26
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #19
^^^this^^^ thoughtful post! ViseGrip Dec 2015 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author NCTraveler Dec 2015 #29
A Judge isn't supposed to comment on a case that may come before them firebrand80 Dec 2015 #31
Bernie is good on support. He co-sponsors a lot of bills Sheepshank Dec 2015 #32
Yes. I trust Clinton more to get it done. Nt seabeyond Dec 2015 #33
Hillary Clinton’s litmus test for Supreme Court nominees: a pledge to overturn Citizens United Gothmog Dec 2015 #35
Hillary Clinton Being Charactterized As Viable in 2016 is Very Much Open to Dispute... CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #36
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sander's Stated Li...»Reply #35