Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: You Decide If MILLIONS "Earned" By Bill Clinton in Speaking Fees During Hillary's Tenure [View all]CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)35. Jon L., Thank You... As Honest And Thoughtful People Clearly Understand Is The Clear Fact That
this history with the Clinton(s) provides strong evidence for opposition accusations of their involvement in a Quid Pro Quo... Which would be damaging to the Democratic Party on the whole, much less Hillary Clinton as a Nominee in the General Election.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You Decide If MILLIONS "Earned" By Bill Clinton in Speaking Fees During Hillary's Tenure [View all]
CorporatistNation
Jan 2016
OP
Yes he earned the money he received for his speaking. You could say the same about
Thinkingabout
Jan 2016
#4
Either Bill should have collected fees for speaking OR Hillary should have run for president and
JDPriestly
Jan 2016
#47
Waiting to see the impropriety proof. Wjat would be different in the case
Thinkingabout
Jan 2016
#49
The comparison is utterly weak. I've already heard about the $200,000 she is said to have
JDPriestly
Jan 2016
#53
Do you seriously think the Republicans will need to prove anything about Hillary?
JDPriestly
Jan 2016
#71
Shocking news: People want to pay an ex president who presided over the most successful economy
Amimnoch
Jan 2016
#28
And the Clinton's also are much more in demand than the George W Bush family.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2016
#32
I Saw "The Big Short" Last Night.. I Highly Recommend That Prior to Casting Your Vote in The Primary
CorporatistNation
Jan 2016
#5
Jon L., Thank You... As Honest And Thoughtful People Clearly Understand Is The Clear Fact That
CorporatistNation
Jan 2016
#35
Clearly it did. What is BULLSHIT is claiming that Clinton didn't also support it.
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#76
You didn't qualify your dismissal and if Clinton didn't support it at all it passes...
uponit7771
Jan 2016
#78
Believe what you want. If a President opposes a bill, more nay votes tend to appear.
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#79
I don't laud what I want above the facts, I'll leave that up to conservatives. The facts are the ...
uponit7771
Jan 2016
#86
Just Da Facts Joe... Just da Facts.. And Da Facts Can Be Painful When Ya Have To Look At Them!
CorporatistNation
Jan 2016
#18
When the quid is that large, a quo is implied. The rules of the game. Dumbfucks.
Elmer S. E. Dump
Jan 2016
#38
Are you trying to convey a message? Because your thought, doesn't seem to go anywhere.
jkbRN
Jan 2016
#14
I remember the shit-fit we all had about Reagan going to Japan and getting $3 million for speaking..
Punkingal
Jan 2016
#22
Yeah, all the other progressive works the Clintons have done so far mean nothing at all. :rolleye:
uponit7771
Jan 2016
#77
actually, I DON'T think actors or athletes should make millions either. I think that is
Karma13612
Jan 2016
#68
"Teh Clinton's are teh evil" is some really rough and ragged sand, better to avoid even walking
uponit7771
Jan 2016
#75