Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

anti partisan

(429 posts)
9. A lot of the fear is probably cause scientists fear the cycles contributing to noise
Mon May 19, 2014, 02:18 AM
May 2014

And if there is added noise, the data can get a lot uglier and obscure the treatment effect in the study group, requiring additional testing which costs additional resources. If there is no reason to believe that the mechanism works different in males than in females, males generally make for better test subjects.

Some kind of balance has to be reached between testing efficiency and making sure that physiological differences in females aren't overlooked. I do think that females should be given equal attention (obviously) but there do exist circumstances where testing on males actually is more efficient in finding cures that can help out females. This isn't a completely black and white issue.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»How feminist biology is c...»Reply #9