Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

apocalypsehow

(12,751 posts)
30. First, what you have done in this sub-thread is what you have done all over DU
Sun Mar 17, 2013, 11:20 PM
Mar 2013

Last edited Mon Mar 18, 2013, 02:52 AM - Edit history (1)

for some time: attempted to bait a poster in back n' forth into saying something that will get a post in their own OP hidden, thus locking them out of their own thread. Especially after you have had a post hidden yourself: I remember the thread where you managed to get a post of yours hidden, and then went on to alert on every single subsequent post of mine - I was getting forwarded "alert results" from other DU'ers whose alert messages - sent by you - simply beggared the imagination for the amount of mendacious duplicity that could be crammed into one sentence.

So, there's that.

But as regards the issue in this sub-thread, you are already trying both over in the Gungeon and here to spread the message that you are "really" for "gun control," even though your posting history at DU says otherwise.

Your pal "friendly" is trying the same tact: after YEARS of posting the most hateful, scurrilous NRA talking points against those of us who believe in sensible gun legislation, he's all of a sudden discovered he's "really" in favor of gun control after all!

"Because I'd like to see effective and Constitutional gun control that won't get reversed at the
next round of Congressional elections"


What it really is is that you don't want to be restricted from posting here, because you think DU is your oyster, and you have a "right" to spread the pro-NRA message wherever you want on this discussion board, even here in a safe haven pro-gun control group. That's how deeply your sense of entitlement - and that of your pals in the Gungeon - runs:

Here's the bottom line: I'm not a Host, so I'm not speaking from any position of authority whatsoever, but I have a feeling that if you abide by the SOP of the group, you will have no problems posting here. The problem is, both you & I well know you have ZERO intention of adhering to the SOP, just as none of your "RKBA enthusiast" friends have any intention of doing same. You are trying to find a wedge, a technicality ("I support many of the same gun control laws you do") to avoid being restricted from posting here. What ultimately happens I imagine will ultimately be up to how you comport yourself in this new group in complying with the SOP.

Your track record to date all over the rest of DU when it comes to these issues doesn't look promising in that regard, but the decision will ultimately be up to the Hosts.

Committee votes on AWB [View all] BainsBane Mar 2013 OP
Thank You & Shame On You is right! Will share. freshwest Mar 2013 #1
I'm starting to sense a pattern here mwrguy Mar 2013 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author hack89 Mar 2013 #3
Democrat vs. Republican BainsBane Mar 2013 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author hack89 Mar 2013 #18
Read the SOP of this group BainsBane Mar 2013 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author hack89 Mar 2013 #20
You're wrong BainsBane Mar 2013 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author hack89 Mar 2013 #22
Post removed Post removed Mar 2013 #23
Post removed Post removed Mar 2013 #24
the litmus test is support for gun control BainsBane Mar 2013 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author hack89 Mar 2013 #26
First, what you have done in this sub-thread is what you have done all over DU apocalypsehow Mar 2013 #30
Obviously! In_The_Wind Mar 2013 #39
The oft stated claim that "no right is absolute" is true in some sense, hansberrym Mar 2013 #4
You know what, I don't really care what limiting the scope of RKBA Progressive dog Mar 2013 #5
So in your view the AWB should not be seen as hansberrym Mar 2013 #6
Of course not Progressive dog Mar 2013 #10
What do you think would happen if Democrats *did* lose control of Congress? friendly_iconoclast Mar 2013 #7
So Democrats should not legislate to slow gun violence Progressive dog Mar 2013 #11
"no one wants to take your guns." Eleanors38 Mar 2013 #8
I want to take some of them, not just ban new but take away existing Progressive dog Mar 2013 #12
Even true quotes want change your mind. Eleanors38 Mar 2013 #32
miller was unanimous for militia jimmy the one Mar 2013 #9
Then AR15's are protected under Miller as they are the semi-automatic version... friendly_iconoclast Mar 2013 #13
Google "Heller", search the decision for "individual", it is that easy. hansberrym Mar 2013 #17
The Heller Court found 9-0 in favor of Individual right. hansberrym Mar 2013 #28
We all have access to the source documents, the game of providing only partial quotes is just silly. hansberrym Mar 2013 #31
Funny that your thread has brought a whole passel of "pro gun progressives" attacking...Democrats. apocalypsehow Mar 2013 #14
So it has BainsBane Mar 2013 #16
Every time I see 'AWB' I instantly think 'Average White Band' Comatose Sphagetti Mar 2013 #27
These results are hardly surprising Rhiannon12866 Mar 2013 #29
Maybe not surprising, but dissappointing that the conversation has not moved forward. hansberrym Mar 2013 #33
This is not the forum to be expressing "RKBA" (see sig line) views. This one is: apocalypsehow Mar 2013 #34
Post removed Post removed Mar 2013 #35
Sounds great. DanTex Mar 2013 #36
Thank you to all who voted for the ban. It's no surprise that the wrong votes were from republicans. In_The_Wind Mar 2013 #37
misleading & out of context jimmy the one Mar 2013 #38
early developmental stage jimmy the one Mar 2013 #40
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Committee votes on AWB»Reply #30