Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control Reform Activism

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
Mon Mar 18, 2013, 01:13 AM Mar 2013

Blocking posters from this group should not be based solely on what they've posted in this group [View all]

Last edited Mon Mar 18, 2013, 02:32 AM - Edit history (2)

but on what they've posted elsewhere on DU as well.

If they've previously posted elsewhere (in GD or the RKBA group, for example) something along the lines of "easy access to guns isn't the problem, and in fact more guns in more hands would make everyone safer" or similar nonsense, then that should be plenty reason enough to block them from this group. We don't need them posting stuff like this http://www.democraticunderground.com/1262314 (satire) while pretending to be serious. (edit: see this thread for some recent examples http://www.democraticunderground.com/126263 ) That's not what this group is for.












Gun Control Reform Activism (Group): About This Group

Statement of Purpose

Discuss how to enact progressive gun control reform in a supportive environment. The group serves as a safe haven in which to mobilize supporters in support of measures reducing gun violence by changing laws, culture and practice at the municipal, state, and federal levels. While there is no single solution to the tragic epidemic of gun violence, members agree that more guns are not the solution to gun violence, and are expected to be supportive of the policies of progressive gun control reform organizations.


This seems pretty clear to me, even though some of DU's "RKBA enthusiasts" are trying to play dumb about it and find loopholes to post here anyways
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wait a minute. All his posts here have argued with visiting Gungeoneers and a search shows this: freshwest Mar 2013 #1
I don't think so BainsBane Mar 2013 #2
No, and satire is his tool on other forums. It may not be a hard thread, but he's also argued with freshwest Mar 2013 #5
I'll make a simple analogy: If some guy kept posting scantily clad bikini pics in the Sports forum Electric Monk Mar 2013 #3
well . . . BainsBane Mar 2013 #8
That's already in the SOP but that hasn't stopped them from posting here so far, has it. Electric Monk Mar 2013 #11
DanTex's post is clearly satire. I think you misread my OP a bit. nt Electric Monk Mar 2013 #4
I edited, but why bring up that post? He's not pretending as OP states. Please cite another post. freshwest Mar 2013 #6
oh that one's easy BainsBane Mar 2013 #7
Electric Monk's OP should cite what he calls the problem: freshwest Mar 2013 #9
How would you suggest I edit it? I thought I was pretty clear. Electric Monk Mar 2013 #12
Just criticize satire. Don't infer there is any pretending, or that he's playing the group. freshwest Mar 2013 #15
Did you not see that big grey block in between where I quoted the group SOP? Electric Monk Mar 2013 #13
okay now I see the confusion BainsBane Mar 2013 #14
I'm using Firefox and saw the SOP. It didn't say no satire. I say his OP was not strictly helpful, freshwest Mar 2013 #16
Ok, I edited my OP with another link. Does that clear things up for you? Electric Monk Mar 2013 #17
I appreciate the edit and wish I could clear my posts that produced confusion. Sorry. freshwest Mar 2013 #18
Your oops is ok. I'd just leave it. I won't hold it against you. It's late. Good night :) Electric Monk Mar 2013 #19
Until we have a host BainsBane Mar 2013 #10
+1 ellisonz Mar 2013 #20
I don't see a problem with a little gun control humor Progressive dog Mar 2013 #21
I agree. DanTex Mar 2013 #22
Thank you for understanding. It was obvious to me that your thread wasn't pretending to be serious. Electric Monk Mar 2013 #23
Yes, I think we should operate based on someone's prior BainsBane Mar 2013 #24
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Blocking posters from thi...»Reply #0