Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I voted just another hobbyist. GGJohn Jan 2015 #1
Why do you need semi-autos? randys1 Jan 2015 #26
Why do I have to have a need? GGJohn Jan 2015 #28
GIven their existence leads to so much death and destruction, are you saying you can have it randys1 Jan 2015 #29
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying, GGJohn Jan 2015 #30
BAzooka? randys1 Jan 2015 #31
Why the hell would I want a bazooka? GGJohn Jan 2015 #32
Why do you NEED a right to religion? kioa Jan 2015 #34
It makes you supremely qualified to host this group. Starboard Tack Jan 2015 #2
My thoughts also. nt dumbcat Jan 2015 #4
You sound like a true responsible gun owner, unlike those in the NRA and our very own gungeon Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #3
Do you support taking away his current right of owning other kinds of rifles? kioa Jan 2015 #12
First of all I never said anything about taking away his rights, second you are in the wrong group Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #15
Do you support the AWB? kioa Jan 2015 #17
This thread is not about the Assault Weapons Ban, and no I am not open to making you a host Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #18
I had to delete the GD thread because it raised the ire of Gungeoneers and I couldn't see any of the flamin lib Jan 2015 #5
sarisataka has continued it in the RKBA group Electric Monk Jan 2015 #6
Well, it can just stay there. flamin lib Jan 2015 #7
Seeing the response to your posts in that thread....you are welcome to host...my sympathies. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #9
Guns are among my least favorite tools. hunter Jan 2015 #8
Was a "sniper" when the Army didn't have a sniper program flamin lib Jan 2015 #11
Would like to see you as host. I agree completely with your position on semi-auto guns. Hoyt Jan 2015 #10
How so? Rifles are one of the least used murder weapons. kioa Jan 2015 #13
Heard it all before.. And it is no reason to allow proliferation of gunz. Hoyt Jan 2015 #14
You don't "allow" any right. kioa Jan 2015 #16
So now we are going from, guns are fine because people get killed by knives, to Hoyt Jan 2015 #19
I don't think you have any cause in insisting that any innocent American should give up ANY right to kioa Jan 2015 #33
Clearly, gunz are important to you. Hoyt Jan 2015 #35
Predictable Hoytism. eom GGJohn Jan 2015 #37
GCRA Statement of Purpose: billh58 Jan 2015 #20
The first thing I'm going to do is add some names to the blocked list. At least three, so far. nt Electric Monk Jan 2015 #21
I'm with you there. nt flamin lib Jan 2015 #22
Thanks n/t billh58 Jan 2015 #24
I'm willing to bet billh58 Jan 2015 #23
Ironically I can't see any of the responses to the GD crosspost and only one flamin lib Jan 2015 #25
makes you a smart person and a responsible gun owner. leftofcool Jan 2015 #27
As someone on the other side of the fence on this issue... kioa Jan 2015 #36
Owning a gun may be a right, flamin lib Jan 2015 #38
Being able to own guns you want to ban IS a current right. kioa Jan 2015 #40
It is NOT a right. It's a current privilege that can and has been prohibited. flamin lib Jan 2015 #43
Post removed Post removed Jan 2015 #44
I repeat, to own some particular type of gun IS NOT A RIGHT. flamin lib Jan 2015 #45
1) Dictionary definitions aren't falsehoods. kioa Jan 2015 #46
Yeah, there's that "true liberals" label---as usual, an indicator of conservative inclinations.(nt) Paladin Jan 2015 #39
Oh sure. kioa Jan 2015 #41
Then refer to yourself as a liberal, rather than a "true liberal." Problem solved. (nt) Paladin Jan 2015 #42
He really, really tried to pull off billh58 Jan 2015 #47
dissection jimmy the one Jan 2015 #48
Thanks for the props. flamin lib Jan 2015 #49
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Pending approval as a hos...»Reply #42