Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Populist Reform of the Democratic Party

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)

5. So did China get these pilot plants up in 2020 as they planned per this 2017 article?

Reply to thx64536 (Original post)

Tue Mar 30, 2021, 02:02 PM

Mar 2021

And do we have significant Th reserves here in the USA, or at least N. America?

I'd hope so since basing our energy future on fuel we don't actually possess seems ... risky.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Thorium based nuclear power is the best choice for our energy future not wind or solar [View all] thx64536 Mar 2021 OP

Just to note. China is also investing more then $360 billion into renewable energy. CentralMass Mar 2021 #1

The thing about renewables - they don't need any fuel Blues Heron Mar 2021 #2

Agree! Other countries are out pacing us with wind, solar and wave. They aren't talking about PortTack Mar 2021 #8

I think it will be a mix exboyfil Mar 2021 #3

Are nuclear and renewables like wind/solar supposed to be mutually exclusive? kysrsoze Mar 2021 #4

Agree 100% ... batteries as it stands are an expensive solution to intermittency problems Hugh_Lebowski Mar 2021 #6

So did China get these pilot plants up in 2020 as they planned per this 2017 article? Hugh_Lebowski Mar 2021 #5

I call bullshit. He is a con-man, selling hype to people who don't know how a reactor works: DetlefK Mar 2021 #7

They use gas to remove the heat Hokie Mar 2021 #9